Posted on 07/12/2018 4:43:57 AM PDT by deks
Agent will testify before Congress [at 10:00 a.m. today, July 12] on anti-Trump text messages that ‘cast a cloud’ over bureau’s Russia and Clinton probes.
(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...
The more I see of this guy, the less I understand why a woman would jeopardize her marriage, family, career, reputation for someone this weaselly and repellent.
we’re talking Page... remember?
Two questions:
1) Why is Gowdy voting “pass”?
2) Why are some voting “Nay” and some voting “No”?
Strzok sitting there with a smirk on his face while they vote on whether to bring back Steve Bannon (just because he refused to answer questions just as Strzok has).
So true.
The other thing that irks me is how do some of these people get on this committee? Unbelievable.
Ha!!! I bet it’s because they spent more time with each other than their own spouses and as a result, weren’t getting TLC at home. Still, it’s wrong.
Varney has Newt on giving good analysis and say the American people will see through any media attempt to give the Democrats an advantage here with their circus disruption.
Rep. Cumming just teed up another opportunity for Strzok to defend himself by delivering another prepared and pre-planned address.
Cummings is among the most hyper-partisan jerks in the House. Total jerk.
Well, you’d still think that a woman, a lawyer, who’d gotten that far would at least have some better sense of self-preservation. This guy is downright sleazy! and not even physically attractive.
The committee is bigger than the audience. This is the government being ungovernable. My BP necessitated that I switch away from the hearing. I will just have to read this thread and see bits much later.
I watched this smug, smirking little P.O.S. for as long as I could. This is nothing but another dog and pony show. When Cummings started talking I turned it off.
WTH are the Republicans doing? Why aren’t they arresting these swamp creatures like they promised to uphold the law of the land?
Does Cummings remind anybody else of a rugby ball, or is it just me?
I recorded it at home so I can watch the questioners that I want without the silly ass Democratic theatrics.
Have we actually seen any evidence of this supposed romantic affair? My guess is that it was used as a cover for why these two were plotting against the President-elect (and perhaps try to get out ahead of it by claiming “hey this stuff is personal and embarrassing you good folks in the media wouldn’t print this, would you?”)
That’s an interesting thought!
That is an observation also made by Lou Dobbs who has said that he has never seen anything resembling salacious or lovey dovey among all their emails.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.