Posted on 07/09/2018 12:47:18 PM PDT by jazusamo
Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer launched a preemptive attack Monday on President Trump’s looming Supreme Court pick, saying the nominee must “share their personal views” on abortion in order to be confirmed.
Mr. Schumer, New York Democrat, said senators should no longer accept general promises of fealty to precedent, and will instead demand...
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Hey Putzhead:
You're not my supervisor...
To borrow an apt appellation along with a well-known meme...
No, he must not tip his hand on how he would rule.
Or she.
Clinton’s pick would be nothing short of black robed tyrant that would be handpicked by NARAL.
From related threads ...
In stark contrast to the rights that the Founding States expressly protected in the Bill of Rights for example, post-17th Amendment (17A) ratification Sen. Schumer’s major constitutional problem with wasting the Senate’s time defending RvW is this.
There is no constitutionally enumerated right to have an abortion that Schumer can use to defend the politically correct right to murder unborn children, the phony “constitutional right” to have an abortion wrongly legislated from the bench by likewise post-17A ratification activist Supreme Court justices imo.
But the bottom line reason that we’re forced to listen to Schumer defend unconstitutional RvW is this imo. Regardless that the uniparty Congress has the constitutional authority to impeach and remove state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices from the bench, corrupt Congress has a track record for not lifting a finger to do so.
That’s why patriots need to give Pres. Trump as much of a new, state sovereignty-respecting, Trump supporting Congress as they can in the 2018 midterm elections.
In fact, and hypothetically speaking, even if Pres. Trump is able to fill the Court with state sovereinty-respecting justices, it remains that the Court can eventually swing back to liberal activism as long as we have the loose-cannon 17A.
The 17th Amendment needs to disappear, the 16th Amendment along with it.
Best election evah.
5.56mm
All your base are belong to you Chuck. That’s the only people you are talking to.
Yeah, we’ll knack to you on that Chuck.
...otherwise Chuck the Schmuck won’t vote for Trump’s pick.
Didn’t RBG tell a bunch of them to pound sand over this very issue during her hearing?
Hey Chuck, why not propose legislation making abortion legal at the federal level? Wouldn’t that be easier than holding a litmus test for a judge? Oh wait, it would never pass so no, no it’s not easier. But that should tell you something right there, shouldn’t it?
Chuck you Schmucky.
Carrying out liberal tactics? We’re
stronger than this.
Schmucky just can’t refrain from acting like he’s the Emperor of the USA with all his absolute pronouncements.
When was Chuck of junk Schummer become emperor?
NOPE....Chuckie you showed and even taught us how to play the game........ain’t going to happen, no way.........the democratic SCOTUS never did :) Thanks
And asking for their personal views is immaterial. Chuckie is a dope. A good SCJ has to ignore their personal views and apply the constitution to the issues brought forth.
Can’t she lie? David Souter lied through his hole hearing.
How about you shut the f up, chuckie?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.