Posted on 06/12/2018 1:07:11 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
President Donald Trump's historic summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Singapore on Tuesday, following on the heels of the two Korean leaders meeting a little over two months ago, has raised the question of whether North Korea and South Korea would ever reunite.
Analysts say unifying North and South Korea could cost a trillion dollars under the best of circumstances and take several decades. The final price tag would also depend largely on what the catalyst for reunification is.
Some analyses put the cost of reunification at far more -- closer to $3 trillion. Experts argue that much of the cost surrounding any scenario for Korean unification would depend on whether the countries decided to converge gradually or if a chaotic event occurs. If the reform were carefully planned and followed by a peaceful union, it would be far less expensive than if North Korea's economy collapsed or a war broke out, requiring massive reconstruction costs.....
(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...
Unless they deed over those rare earth minerals, platinum, gold, silver and iron ore. Then we’ll gladly pay. Estimates for those are above $40 trillion.
The left wants nuclear war..they would rather DIE than give President Trump credit for ANYTHING
Too Early CBS. Too Early.
Media analysts and self-styled experts all sit around on their butts pontificating from outside while other people do the real work. They are a cohort of useless know-it-all blowhards who are quite possibly the most irritating people on the planet.
So—Suddenly liberals are worried about costs?
This piece is in no way negative towards America or TRUMP. It simply states the possible costs of reunification citing varying ways it could be accomplished.
Natter Nabobs of Negativity. No kidding. Investor from around the world could turn Un and his cronies into billionaires.
How much would a nuclear war cost?
Leave the border mined. Set up some component assembly facilities in NK to provide some employment. Gradually increase over time to the degree it's cost effective.
This article has zero to do with costs borne by us.
in other news, Main Street Media condemns D Day invasion for costing so much.
Lets just get peace and de-nuke first.
Ping.
They already have a common language so teaching them to be civilized would expedite the situation.
The only problem would be housing which is a lot easier in the countryside.
According to legend Paul McCartney was at John Lennon’s watching this on Tv and told John they should go on down and sing.
I was in West Germany in 1990 when full reunification was in the planning stages. One of the West’s big telecom execs said that integrating the phones between east and west was going to be like merging an autobahn onto a one lane dirt road.
I think George showed up and got his $750.
Anything and everything to hurt Trump.
Trump just finished a successful first step. No one is seriously talking about unification - Hell, they haven’t even signed a peace treaty for a war that’s been going on for 68 years! However, if they do it someday, that’ll be traced back to Trump...so they have to make it look bad.
What this stupid harridan doesn’t understand is that 90% of the people out there know very well that the most expensive peacetime investments pale in cost to fighting a hot war...particularly with nukes. One nuke on Seoul or Tokyo (or L.A., for that matter) will make $3 Trillion look like peanuts, and it won’t produce any future benefits (as unification would).
North Korea has over $20 trillion in rare earth metal reserves so $3 trillion for reunification is actually quite affordable for them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.