Hopefully the Obama consigliere does not have this conversation with him before testimony....
Posted on 06/04/2018 4:32:46 PM PDT by CaptainK
emanate
do you mean imminent?
“...FR...the constant negativity...”
It has been worse than ever lately and deadens morale here.
Sometimes I think the negative Nellies are part of a psy -op to discourage all of us! (not really, but one at least wonders for a minute)
Those who chronically write disheartening posts need to remember that this President is not like the others. Therefore just because in the past the swamp has not been successfully drained does not mean it won’t happen this time.
Opps, yes
thought so - not nit picking - just clarifying - good point.
What happened to this testimony. Haven’t heard a word about it today.
“You’ve worked very hard for many years. Praying that everything you’ve done pays off.”
We still have one last shot at it. Strangely, it depends on the Utah primary June 26th. That’s all I can divulge.
Ok. Will just pray that whatever you need to have happen happens so that justice can finally be served.
I’m assuming nothing happened today
I'm assuming a lot happened. If nothing happened, or it even hinted at anything unfavorable for for Trump, the left wing media would be shouting it from every rooftop.
I meant did he even testify?
thanks now I know how to spell imminent. :)
This appears to be what happened. Very disturbing:
Was it on the public record, or before the Intelligence Committee and under seal?
“Update: According to email from congressional staff, participation at the closed hearing was limited to only those selected by Committee Chairman (Gowdy, and Goodlatte). The hearing was not available to all committee members. Only Jordan, Meadows and Krishnamoorth were allowed to participate.”
“One of the things that aggravates me about FR, and makes me wonder about the make-up of many posters, is the constant negativity”
FR is the petri dish for Stockholm Syndrome.
If Patty Hearst hadn’t gotten there first, it would have been invented here.
(I know she didn’t invent it...but it made for a witty statement. And I had to write this parenthetical because if Sigmund Freud hadn’t already invented “anal retentive” that would have been invented here too).
It was a joint committee, House Judiciary Committee and House Oversight & Government Reform Committee.
It is not unusual for private testimony to be heard by only a couple Congressional committee members, as questions and answers are usually negotiated and agreed to ahead of time. Sometimes limiting those present is a condition of the testimony.
The members present were selected by the two committee chairman. Other committee members were not invited.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.