Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN Goes Nuclear on Sanders After WH Briefing; ‘She Has Lost Credibility’ with the Country
Newsbuster.org ^ | May 3, 2018 | Curtis Houck

Posted on 05/03/2018 3:36:28 PM PDT by Kaslin

Conditions reached DEFCON-1 over at CNN on Thursday afternoon following a tense White House press briefing filled with questions about the administration’s credibility. These frenzied inquiries were sparked by Rudy Giuliani's stunning admission that the President reimbursed Michael Cohen for the Stormy Daniels hush payment. 

CNN political director David Chalian and senior political reporter Nia-Malika Henderson went ballistic over Sanders having "lost credibility with the American people” and bolstered the lewd claims about Sanders made by Michelle Wolf at Saturday’s White House Correspondents Dinner. 

 

CNN Goes Nuclear on Sanders After WH Briefing; ‘She Has Lost Credibility’ with the Country

This stands in contrast to how the liberal media treated then-White House Press Secretary Mike McCurry, who served during the height of Bill Clinton’s sex scandals and spent countless briefings arguing that at the end of the day, he knew nothing about Clinton’s exploits.

First, the 2018 shenanigans. Fill-in CNN Newsroom host Erica Hill started with a question for Chalian, wondering: “[H]ow can we trust anything we're hearing when this President has such a blatant disregard for the truth?”

Chalian unloaded, declaring that viewers should “[c]ircle May 3rd on your calendar because this is the day we will look back on in his briefing where Sarah Sanders made it so painfully clear she has lost credibility with the American people, with the reporters in that room.”

He continued uninterrupted

Well, when the spokesperson for the President of the United States of America comes to that podium and provides incorrect, false, bad information, they have no credibility to continue with that job. I'm not suggesting she's on her way out. I'm sure Sarah Sanders will stay there because she's pleasing an audience of one. But she has acknowledged she can only go out there with information, the best available. If the best available is false, bad, and untrue information, she's failing at her job and I think we saw that time and again in this press briefing today and I think it will go down as the real time that Sarah Sanders has lost her credibility with the American people.

To Hill’s credit, she pushed back on Chalian’s diatribe, making the point that the blame lay with the President for lying and giving conflicting information.

Chalian dismissed that argument outright, telling Hill that “[i]f she can't verify what she's going out with to that podium to answer questions” with absolutely certainty, then “she shouldn’t be speaking about it at all.”

She remarked to Henderson that this scenario echoed Sean Spicer's actions at the behest of the President on Inauguration Day, in which he uttered  “a falsehood about something really small.” She further argued that Sanders' behavior lent credence Wolf’s crass routine from Saturday :

Here is Sarah Sanders, who, of course, was mocked, right? If you remember the White House Correspondents Dinner, I mean, this was part of the theme of that comedienne’s attack, the idea that Sarah Sanders had a problem with the truth. And I think we got plenty of evidence today and through these last couple of months that she does have a problem being candid and part of her job there is almost like a reporter, right? I mean, it's almost digging for as much information as she can get, verifying that information and presenting that information, right? And if she has doubts about that information, then she shouldn't go out there presenting that information as if it's truthful and that's what she has done and you saw here today basically deflect, go to outside counsel, I’m giving you the best information I can. But it's not the best information if it isn’t vetted if it’s a falsehood. That’s not good information. That’s terrible information.

As for the press secretary's non-verbal cues, Chalian replied that Sanders was “wearing it on her face, in her words, that she knows because....she recognizes that working in that role in this White House under this level of scrutiny has demolished her credibility.”

Now back to the 1990s. When McCurry left the White House in 1998, then-Reliable Sources host Howard Kurtz offered a fawning October 1, 1998 piece for CNN.com. 

NBC’s John Palmer told him: “Reporters perceived Mike McCurry as a good and a decent person, first of all, and that counts for a lot. He has never, at least that we know of, lied to us, that counts for a lot.”

Using language that will never be heard on CNN to portray Spicer or Sanders in a positive light, Kurtz hyped that McCurry “bobbed and weaved his way through plenty of scandals” and during the Lewinsky scandal, “McCurry proudly proclaimed himself to be ‘out of the loop’” and thus “couldn't respond to questions.”

Here’s more from the post 

But his best efforts were overwhelmed by the Lewinsky scandal, leaving McCurry in the uncomfortable posture of President Richard Nixon's spokesman Ron Ziegler during the stonewalling of Watergate.

By the time the country learned that Clinton had been lying for seven months, McCurry had already announced his departure, turning over the job to his deputy, Joe Lockhart.

A final review for the Mike McCurry show?

He was, of course, an unwitting participant in the Monica Lewinsky coverup, but he was far more helpful to reporters in private conversations, when the cameras were turned off.

CNN Newsroom May 3, 2018 2:54 p.m. Eastern

ERICA HILL: David Chalian, I'm not sure where to begin here, but I will say. A few things that stuck out from the very beginning. There is this obvious question which we cannot ignore and we've been talking about now for — I would say since the campaign the fact that the President is continually changing stories and what we're hearing, the “facts” seem to keep changing. Sarah Sanders said today and quoting here “I would always advise against giving false information” and yet there's a question, David, of how can we trust anything we're hearing when this President has such a blatant disregard for the truth?

DAVID CHALIAN: Well, and of course, and if the President does, then that infects the people on his behalf. Circle May 3rd on your calendar because this is the day we will look back on in his briefing where Sarah Sanders made it so painfully clear she has lost credibility with the American people, with the reporters in that room. She completely would sidestep and say that she could only give the best information she has. She was acknowledging to Jim Acosta’s question that she came out and provided incorrect information. Well, when the spokesperson for the President of the United States of America comes to that podium and provides incorrect, false, bad information, they have no credibility to continue with that job. I'm not suggesting she's on her way out. I'm sure Sarah Sanders will stay there because she's pleasing an audience of one. But she has acknowledged she can only go out there with information, the best available. If the best available is false, bad, and untrue information, she's failing at her job and I think we saw that time and again in this press briefing today and I think it will go down as the real time that Sarah Sanders has lost her credibility with the American people.

HILL: But, David, let me press you on that for just a moment because, yes, there is a fact that she said repeatedly, as you point out today, I'm giving you the best information I have at the time. Is this Sarah Sanders failing in her job or is this Sarah Sanders doing her job? She's giving us the information that she has at the time, which then continues to change based on the giver of that information, the President.

CHALIAN: But Erica, she's speaking on behalf of the President of the United States. If she can't verify what she's going out with to that podium to answer questions with is truthful, accurate information, she shouldn't be speaking about it at all. That's not the case here. She spoke with bad information because we are now learning it was not truthful when she walked out there in March and delivered those answers and she — I thought she was clear in acknowledging that today.

HILL: There’s also — maybe if you look at sort of, as you point out, circle this date on our calendars, May 3 and Nia-Malika, the question is where do we go from here in terms of information and being able to trust anything that comes out of this White House?

NIA-MALIKA HENDERSON: Well, I mean, I think you go back to day one with Sean Spicer, right? Blatantly going out and telling a falsehood about something really small, right? Crowd size and from what we could tell, he was basically sent out there by the President who was unhappy about the comparisons of his crowd size to Obama's crowd size. So this is a book end and echo event. Here is Sarah Sanders, who, of course, was mocked, right? If you remember the White House Correspondents Dinner, I mean, this was part of the theme of that comedienne’s attack, the idea that Sarah Sanders had a problem with the truth. And I think we got plenty of evidence today and through these last couple of months that she does have a problem being candid and part of her job there is almost like a reporter, right? I mean, it's almost digging for as much information as she can get, verifying that information and presenting that information, right? And if she has doubts about that information, then she shouldn't go out there presenting that information as if it's truthful and that's what she has done and you saw here today basically deflect, go to outside counsel, I’m giving you the best information I can. But it's not the best information if it isn’t vetted if it’s a falsehood. That’s not good information. That’s terrible information.

CHALIAN: And, Erica, just to add to what Nia is saying there, I think Sarah Sanders is wearing it on her face, in her words, that she knows because she is totally — to Nia’s point, she’s completely changed her approach to all this. It is all now about go to outside counsel, go to outside counsel, I can only give the best information I had at the time. That is a shift because she recognizes that working in that role in this White House under this level of scrutiny has demolished her credibility. So she's taking a different approach.

HILL: And I will say to your point, David, I thought there was definitely a change in her demeanor today.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: clintonnewsnetwork; cnn; conservativesrepubs; cyperalerts; davidchalian; ericahill; fakenewnetwork; fakenews; fnnetwork; howardkurtz; libsanddemonrats; media; msm; niamalkahenderson; sarahhuckabeesanders; sexscandals; trumprussiaprobe; video; whcd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last
To: Kaslin

If ATT acquires this malicious network, be sure to dump ATT


81 posted on 05/03/2018 5:39:08 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Braizile
82 posted on 05/03/2018 5:41:20 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Agreed...


83 posted on 05/03/2018 5:51:46 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Communist News Network lost their credibility more than 20 years ago.


84 posted on 05/03/2018 5:54:17 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

methinks the WH press corps is looking for a scalp to hang on their collective belts. They will go on a full court press to drive Sarah out.

What kind of leverage do we, citizens of the USA, have to fight back??


85 posted on 05/03/2018 5:57:36 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said theoal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Pot calling the kettle black.

CNN lost all credibility long ago.


86 posted on 05/03/2018 6:03:46 PM PDT by Boomer (Leftism is a Malignant Moral Cancer on Society!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

CNN is not a news source.


87 posted on 05/03/2018 6:07:35 PM PDT by stillfree? (Don't let illegals turn your state into California.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So PNN is saying Sanders has lost credibility......These jokes write them selves!!!


88 posted on 05/03/2018 6:17:53 PM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I love Sara Sanders. Trash talking from the loutish, lying media persons is like vomit in a toilet. Flush them for the crap they are. Sanders is the best press secretary I have paid attention to in years.


89 posted on 05/03/2018 6:21:27 PM PDT by mountainfolk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

NO, CNN! You have NO credibility! Nothing you say is worth listening to. So take your communist colluding propaganda and move to Red China.


90 posted on 05/03/2018 6:40:46 PM PDT by Retvet (Retvete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Love it Otoh the yell out inappropriate comments Maybe a muzzle is in order


91 posted on 05/03/2018 6:43:00 PM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT Hi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Pravious

“The 50% or so who live in some weird fantasy world where their little ugly bitch won the election.”

Closer to 20%.


92 posted on 05/03/2018 6:46:24 PM PDT by dsc (Our system of government cannot survive one-party control of communications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dsc
"You are known by your enemies".

She has all the right enemies.

If the creatures at CNN say you are not credible, you are perfectly credible.

93 posted on 05/03/2018 6:58:11 PM PDT by Mogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
CNN political director David Chalian has excreted pure anti-Trump venom from every pore ever since his beloved Hildabeast went down in flames.

These hate-filled diatribes should be seen for the political poison they release into the room.

For the health of all conerned, Chalian must be barred from future White House briefing venues.


94 posted on 05/03/2018 9:46:26 PM PDT by henbane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; Fantasywriter

Plus cruise ships

:(


95 posted on 05/03/2018 9:47:48 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

SARA:

Please tell your husband not to kill any of these reprobates at CNN; yes, if I were on his jury I would find him innocent and call it defense of self and family.
But in today’s crooked judicial system they would probably find him guilty and sentence him to a re-education camp.
You stand head and shoulders above these mental midgets, as a giant above Lilliputians.
Do not let them wear you down , do not let them dissuade you from the difficult duty you have accepted and born so nobly.
Remember, those who would serve a higher cause will always be attacked by the base jackals among lions.


96 posted on 05/04/2018 12:56:51 AM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HotHunt

I LOVE IT.
GO SARA.


97 posted on 05/04/2018 1:09:45 AM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They fear and therefore hate Sarah......;-}


98 posted on 05/04/2018 3:24:17 AM PDT by trebb (I stopped picking on the mentally ill hypocrites who pose as conservatives...mostly ;-})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf
Would you expect a homosexual lie Chalian to cut Trump some slack?

Did you mean 'like'?


Let's look for 'slack' here:


 

A BIBLICAL Message to LGBT folks EVERYWHERE!



 
Genesis 13:13
Now the men of Sodom were wicked and were sinning greatly against the LORD.

Genesis 18:20-21
20. Then the LORD said, "The outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is so great and
their sin so grievous
21. that I will go down and see if what they have done is as bad as the outcry that has reached me. If not, I will know."

Genesis 19:4-7
4. Before they had gone to bed, all the men
from every part of the city of Sodom--both young and old--surrounded the house.
5. They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them
."
6. Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him
7. and said, "No, my friends. Don't do this wicked thing.


Leviticus niv

18:22 Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable.

20:13 If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

 
 


Psalms 12:8 The wicked freely strut about when what is vile is honored among men.

Doonesbury Cartoon for Feb/08/2013

Isaiah 3:9 The look on their faces testifies against them; they parade their sin like Sodom; they do not hide it. Woe to them! They have brought disaster upon themselves.

2 Peter 2:13b Their idea of pleasure is to carouse in broad daylight. They are blots and blemishes, reveling in their pleasures while they feast with you.


Ezekiel 16:49-50
49. "`Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy.
50. They were haughty and did detestable things before me. Therefore I did away with them as you have seen.


Romans 1     New American Bible (Revised Edition) (NABRE)
 
 18 The wrath of God is indeed being revealed from heaven against every impiety and wickedness of those who suppress the truth by their wickedness. 19 For what can be known about God is evident to them, because God made it evident to them. 20 Ever since the creation of the world, his invisible attributes of eternal power and divinity have been able to be understood and perceived in what he has made. As a result, they have no excuse; 21 for although they knew God they did not accord him glory as God or give him thanks. Instead, they became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless minds were darkened. 22 While claiming to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for the likeness of an image of mortal man or of birds or of four-legged animals or of snakes.
 

24 Therefore, God handed them over to impurity through the lusts of their hearts for the mutual degradation of their bodies. 25 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie and revered and worshiped the creature rather than the creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. 26 Therefore, God handed them over to degrading passions. Their females exchanged natural relations for unnatural, 27 and the males likewise gave up natural relations with females and burned with lust for one another. Males did shameful things with males and thus received in their own persons the due penalty for their perversity. 28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God handed them over to their undiscerning mind to do what is improper. 29 They are filled with every form of wickedness, evil, greed, and malice; full of envy, murder, rivalry, treachery, and spite. 


2 Peter 2

1. But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them--bringing swift destruction on themselves.
2. Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute.
3. In their greed these teachers will exploit you with stories they have made up. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping.
4. For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but sent them to hell, putting them into gloomy dungeons to be held for judgment;
5. if he did not spare the ancient world when he brought the flood on its ungodly people, but protected Noah, a preacher of righteousness, and seven others;
6. if he condemned the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah by burning them to ashes, and made them an example of what is going to happen to the ungodly;
7. and if he rescued Lot, a righteous man, who was distressed by the filthy lives of lawless men
8. (for that righteous man, living among them day after day, was tormented in his righteous soul by the lawless deeds he saw and heard)--
9. if this is so, then the Lord knows how to rescue godly men from trials and to hold the unrighteous for the day of judgment, while continuing their punishment.
10. This is especially true of those who follow the corrupt desire of the sinful nature and despise authority. Bold and arrogant, these men are not afraid to slander celestial beings;
11. yet even angels, although they are stronger and more powerful, do not bring slanderous accusations against such beings in the presence of the Lord.
12. But these men blaspheme in matters they do not understand. They are like brute beasts, creatures of instinct, born only to be caught and destroyed, and like beasts they too will perish.
13. They will be paid back with harm for the harm they have done.
Their idea of pleasure is to carouse in broad daylight. They are blots and blemishes, reveling in their pleasures while they feast with you.



But there IS hope!!!

1 Corinthians 6:9-11

9. Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived:
Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders
10. nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
11. And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.


If you could NOT change, you would be in most pitiful shape...

 
 
 
 
 
 
 


The Health Risks of gay sex.

99 posted on 05/04/2018 4:41:30 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 5th MEB

Where are the ‘feminists’ standing up for Sarah?


100 posted on 05/04/2018 4:44:53 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson