Posted on 03/20/2018 12:45:38 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Polygraph tests taken in 2011 by Stormy Daniels and her ex-husband Michael Mosney support Daniels accounts that she had unprotected sex with President Trump in July 2006, according to a report Tuesday.
A polygraph examiner specifically asked Daniels in 2011 if she had "unprotected sex" with Trump in July of 2006. According to records published by the Wall Street Journal, Daniels was truthful when she answered "yes."
Before taking the lie-detector test in 2011, Life & Style Magazine allegedly offered Clifford $15,000 to share the story about her affair with Trump after Daniel's agent reached out to them, the WSJ reports. After interviewing and taking the polygraph, the magazine contacted Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen to request a comment.
Cohen reportedly threatened to sue the magazine and Life & Style decided not to publish the story.
Cohen paid Daniels $130,000 in hush money so she would not discuss her alleged relationship with Trump. Daniels signed a nondisclosure agreement in 2016, but Daniels filed a lawsuit this month calling for it to be nullified because Trump failed to sign it.
Daniel's lawyer, Michael Avenatti, did not extensively comment on Daniel's attempted to sell the story of her affair with Trump in 2011.
Unfortunately, and despite the prior WSJ reporting which was credible, this story is far more fiction than fact. Too many inaccuracies to count, Avenatti said in a written statement, according to The Wall Street Journal.
Not only that.. Barack Hussein Obama denied his own son is his. Despicable.
i n a d m i s s i b l e . i n . c o u r t
Hence, so what?
a poly test? seriously?
The tramp probably fantasized about Trump since the eighties so it would have been easy for her to pass any test. She’s so obsessed with him, it’s sickening.
If Trump didn’t sign the paperwork then the “act” never happened.
Have we heard from or about the wife of the attorney that dished out personal $130k to a hore? Is she filling for a divorce?
Has anyone checked on bill lately? how green with jealousy is he? I’d bet he wishes stormy was harassing him.
And why don’t Hillary, Comey and Company not also take like detector tests, if they are a determining factor for truth?????
Big Deal.
She told me a few lies and I believe her...
WTF Cares....When Yer Up-2-Yer@$$ in Gators, Screw Da Small Stuff!!!!!!
TRUMP.45 IF WE Can Keep Him?
Mr. POTUS.45 Cocked & Locked!
GunnyG@PlanetWTF?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This might be true. But when someone has been SO DEMONIZED by the media, and the list of insane attacks starts with working with Putin to steal the election, the burden of proof is on the accuser.
This is not even taking in mind the legal premise of justice in this country which is innocent until proven guilty.
How many millions of dollars of free publicity do pornstars get coming forward, not to mention Commies/Socialists/Democrats throwing money at them?
They have proven time and time again they will run anything against Trump with zero fact-checking.
Just saying...
That’s what she said...
Question to Stormy:
Why did she choose to have an affair with Donald?
What was her motive?
Her answer will expose her real intentions.
So, Daniel's own lawyer doesn't believe the WSJ article from 2011, but it gets reported again in 2018. OK. Sure.
I remember when the guy who said he had a homo relationship with Obama spoke out..the media called him a liar and that was it..I mean honestly WHO THE HELL CARES who Trump slept with back in the day seriously..everyone knows he was a ladies man, so what..as long as he’s not doing it in the White House I could care less..meanwhile JFK slept with anything that moved while IN the White House, including Marilyn Monroe and the left calls him a hero
“Bill Clinton is a rapist”.
In all honesty, the High School Musical: Gun Control poster children are likely going to motivate more voters (law abiding gun owners hopefully) in November than this woman ever would.
Mass medias handbook:
Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom Lucifer.
― Saul D. Alinsky, Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals
Alinskys 13 Rules for Radicals:
1. Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have. Power is derived from 2 main sources money and people. Have-Nots must build power from flesh and blood.
2. Never go outside the expertise of your people. It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.
3. Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy. Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
4. Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
5. Ridicule is mans most potent weapon. There is no defense. Its irrational. Its infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
6. A good tactic is one your people enjoy. Theyll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. Theyre doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.
7. A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Dont become old news.
8. Keep the pressure on. Never let up. Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.
9. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself. Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.
10.The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.
11. If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive. Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.
12. The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Never let the enemy score points because youre caught without a solution to the problem.
13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
Lie detectors are a joke.
“Bill Clinton” and “It’s just sex” circa 1990’s.
10 years ago or more; and all indications is this is done by Trump’s detractors, Democrats, etc, I’m sorry.
Which is the counterpoint.
They didn’t care back then, now they clutch pearls?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.