Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE CLINTON EMAIL SCANDAL AND THE FBI’S INVESTIGATION OF IT An Interim Report
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs United States Senate ^ | Feb 7 2018 | Senator Ron Johnson

Posted on 02/07/2018 2:58:54 PM PST by smileyface

Executive Summary Given the recent interest in Congress’s and this Committee’s oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the FBI’s investigation of classified information on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server, this interim majority staff report serves as an update on actions we have taken and what we have learned to date. As the Committee continues to investigate, Chairman Johnson has requested additional documents and materials from the Justice Department. The FBI is the nation’s premier law enforcement agency, and it is crucial that the public has full faith and confidence in its integrity and impartiality. Unfortunately, a number of actions taken by high-level FBI officials have legitimately called both into question.

(Excerpt) Read more at hsgac.senate.gov ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 201802; billpriestap; california; carterpage; clinton; clintonemailscandal; committee; congress; davidlaufman; devinnunes; dojig; email; emails; fbi; fisa; hillary; hillaryclinton; hillarysemails; investigation; jeffsessions; johnbrennan; johnson; laufman; nongovserver; private; privateemailserver; report; rodrosenstein; ronjohnson; ronjohnsonreport; scandal; senate; server; soshillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

1 posted on 02/07/2018 2:58:54 PM PST by smileyface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smileyface

THE CLINTON EMAIL SCANDAL AND THE FBI’S
INVESTIGATION OF IT

An Interim Report

A Majority Staff Report of the
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
United States Senate
Senator Ron Johnson, Chairman

III. Conclusion
We should all recognize the harm done to our rule of law when crimes go unpunished
because government officials look the other way for the wealthy, famous, or powerful.
Americans rightly expect a single and impartial system of justice for all, not one for the wellconnected
and a separate one for everyone else.
The information available to the Committee at this time raises serious questions about
how the FBI applied the rule of law in its investigation of classified information on Secretary
Clinton’s private email server. We know that:
• The FBI did not use a grand jury to compel testimony and obtain the vast majority of
evidence, choosing instead to offer immunity deals and allow fact witnesses to join key
interviews.
• There were substantial edits to Director Comey’s public statement that served to
downplay the severity of Secretary Clinton’s actions, and that the first draft of the memo
was distributed for editing two months before key witnesses were interviewed.
• Director Comey stated that he had not consulted with the Justice Department or White
House, when text messages suggest otherwise.106 We have text messages in which two
key investigators discuss an “insurance policy” against the “risk” of a Trump presidency,
and “OUR task.”107
• Messages discuss “unfinished business,” “an investigation leading to impeachment,” and
“my gut sense and concern there’s no big there there.”108
• Senior FBI officials—likely including Deputy Director McCabe— knew about newly
discovered emails on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner for almost a month before
Director Comey notified Congress.
• Over the period of at least four months, the FBI did not recover five months’ worth of
text messages requested by DOJ OIG and two Senate committees; however, when
pressed, DOJ OIG was able to recover missing texts in less than one week.
Taken together, this information warrants further inquiry. While some may discount the
investigation for political reasons, we all have a great interest in ensuring the public has
confidence in the integrity and independence of the FBI, the preeminent law enforcement agency
in the world. Unlike prosecutors or inspectors general, the primary goal of congressional
oversight is full transparency in order to promote public awareness and confidence in federal
agencies. For these reasons, our important work will continue.

file:///C:/Users/Michael/Downloads/2018-02-07%20Interim%20Report_The%20Clinton%20Email%20Scandal%20and%20the%20FBI’s%20Investigation%20of%20It.pdf


2 posted on 02/07/2018 3:00:51 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike ("You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; NIKK

Ping!


3 posted on 02/07/2018 3:03:05 PM PST by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Even if we don’t know about it yet... I hope that the email investigation has been officially re-opened. We don’t need the time limits running out. Hillary has to be charged and sent to trial. The same goes for all the other scandals.


4 posted on 02/07/2018 3:08:04 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Too bad we don’t have an AG.


5 posted on 02/07/2018 3:08:27 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Lanny Davis on Hannity said “FBI said Cankles’ server/emails were never hacked.”

Can anyone confirm this?


6 posted on 02/07/2018 3:09:12 PM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LS
Lanny Davis on Hannity said “FBI said Cankles’ server/emails were never hacked.” Can anyone confirm this?

Not that I am aware of, it is my understanding that the FBI could not prove the server was hacked, but believed it likely the server was hacked.

7 posted on 02/07/2018 3:15:43 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

That perp walk is going to be a real Conga line.


8 posted on 02/07/2018 3:16:12 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LS

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/07/us/hillary-clintons-email-was-probably-hacked-experts-say.html

When the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, said on Tuesday that his investigators had no “direct evidence” that Hillary Clinton’s email account had been “successfully hacked,” both private experts and federal investigators immediately understood his meaning: It very likely had been breached, but the intruders were far too skilled to leave evidence of their work.

Mr. Comey described, in fairly blistering terms, a set of email practices that left Mrs. Clinton’s systems wide open to Russian and Chinese hackers, and an array of others. She had no full-time cybersecurity professional monitoring her system. She took her BlackBerry everywhere she went, “sending and receiving work-related emails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries.” Her use of “a personal email domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent.


9 posted on 02/07/2018 3:19:45 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Just finished reading Time to turn over to GJ or DA


10 posted on 02/07/2018 3:21:05 PM PST by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

11 posted on 02/07/2018 3:22:18 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike ("You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
What triggered the attack on Benghazi?

Answer: Hillary's server was HACKED, Christopher Stevens' plans and whereabouts became known.. The rest is history. Have they found the MISSING EMAILS on Hillary's server from the weeks leading up to Benghazi and shortly thereafter?? Hmmmm???

12 posted on 02/07/2018 3:23:47 PM PST by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: smileyface

What difference, at this point, does it make?


13 posted on 02/07/2018 3:26:31 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

> Hillary’s server was HACKED, Christopher Stevens’ plans and whereabouts became known..

Could be. Wouldn’t surprise me at all!


14 posted on 02/07/2018 3:28:15 PM PST by veracious (UN = OIC = Islam ; Dems may change USAgov completely, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: smileyface

9. On June 10, 2016, the FBI and Justice Department agreed to immunize key figures in the investigation, including Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson.54 These agreements included side deals that required the FBI to destroy evidence on computer devices turned over to the FBI.55 A more rigorous investigation might have utilized its full authority (including use of an empaneled grand jury) to compel testimony and obtain evidence.

WHO signed off on this???


15 posted on 02/07/2018 3:31:10 PM PST by smileyface (Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smileyface

I just read this entire report. It is devastating to the FBI, the DOJ, and even alludes to Obama’s involvement. This will stir up some shinola!


16 posted on 02/07/2018 3:32:10 PM PST by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Weak...
1. Obama knew he was corresponding to his SOS on an insecure server.
2. Obama used an email alias to hide his identity.
3. Clinton communicated state security secrets on the insecure server when on foreign soil.
4. FBI destroyed evidence.
5. Clinton not under oath when she was interviewed.
6. No tapes of interview made.
7. FBI illegally decided on their own that she wouldn’t be prosecuted. That decision has to be made by DOJ.
8. Cheryl Mills illegally immunized as Clinton’s lawyer when she wasn’t.

On and on and on.

Lock her up. Forever.


17 posted on 02/07/2018 3:32:19 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

It’s purpose WAS to be hacked, for pay-to-play.


18 posted on 02/07/2018 3:33:08 PM PST by smileyface (Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LS

DNC, DCCC and John Podesta’s account is all I’m aware of.


19 posted on 02/07/2018 3:34:19 PM PST by griswold3 (Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: smileyface

From the report:

12. On November 3, 2016, Page wrote to Strzok, “The nyt [sic] probability numbers are
dropping every day. I’m scared for our organization.”86 This is likely a reference to
the New York Times presidential election forecast, which gave Secretary Clinton as
high as a 93 percent chance of winning on October 25, before dropping to an 85
percent change as of November 3.87


20 posted on 02/07/2018 3:34:50 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson