Posted on 02/06/2018 6:49:48 PM PST by bitt
A few moments ago Senator Chuck Grassley released an updated version of his memo which substantiates his prior Criminal Referral, against Christopher Steele, to the Department of Justice.
Last Friday Chairman Grassley asked FBI Director Chris Wray to remove the prior redactions and declassify the underlying supportive documents; known as the “Grassley Memo”. FBI Director Wray did not remove all redactions; but did remove most. Here is the newest version (pdf link here):
p
Thanks for the ping.
Hannity has been reading the redacted Grassley memo.
Would imagine that Sid Blumenthal will be blacked out. This sucker needs a long term in prison.
Saw that weasel from our past Lanny Davis on Hannity spinning the Rat corruption. His only response was that Sessions and his henchman Rosenweasel don’t seem to have a problem with this.
Poor Adam Schiff. Good thing he has the speech and debate clause to fall back on.
AN FYI -because this is declassified, the first black mark at the beginning of most paragraphs blacks out the classification level. The (U) at the beginning of other paragraphs just means that it contains unclassified material. nothing nefarious is meant by the blackout marks at the beginning of some paragraphs. In fact, it’s a good thing —a sign that this has been declassified.....
Note the mention of the State Department. Drip, drip, drip indeed!
FBI concealed Info in dossier, Steel shady sourcing (Blumenthal etc), Steel media contacts, Steel anti Trump bias, and dossier funding Hillary/ DNC from FISA.
“Hannity has been reading the redacted Grassley memo.”
Hannity needs to start talking about what laws were broken here. I’m tired of the Bleach Bit, Acid wash, 33,000 email scandal. I want to hear what law McCabe and the rest of them broke.
Good to know .. thanks.
“His only response was that Sessions and his henchman Rosenweasel don’t seem to have a problem with this.”
Rosenstein doesn’t..well duh that weasel is implicated as for Sessions the best you can say is he’s worthless but l’d say much worse.
He had Greg Garret on enumerating the violations of Federal Code. It’s voluminous.
“Hannity needs to start talking about what laws were broken here”
He has through Greg Jarrett. He will at times even specify the codes that have been broken. Most those tonight revolve around lying to the court.
Who is the "2nd defendant" they are going after?
who is the 1st defendant? How many defendants in total?
I did see that they are persuing the CRIME of lying to congress... violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1001
THAT could jail a LOT of folks!!!!
18 U.S.C. § 1001 - U.S. Code - Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1001.
Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully--
falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331 ), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
Grassley is the reason to be against term limits.
Read it. Devasting. If Sessions does not set up a special counsel and blue ribbon reformation panel within several days he MUST be fired.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.