Posted on 01/28/2018 3:03:51 PM PST by bitt
On the night of Thursday December 7th, 2017 it was announced that U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras was recused from the case against General Mike Flynn. This recusal came five days after Judge Contreras accepted the initial pleading from Flynn. Almost two months have passed, and theres no explanation why?
(Reuters) The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia judge presiding over the criminal case for President Donald Trumps former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn has been recused from handling the case, a court spokeswoman said on Thursday. (read more)
If sufficient judicial conflict existed on December 7th, why wasnt that conflict present on December 1st, when Judge Contreras presided over Flynns initial pleading?
The story behind why U.S. District Court Judge would be recused, is transparently missing from any follow-up by media. With all the current sunlight over possible manipulation of a FISA court application by the FBI, no-one seems curious if Judge Rudolph Contreras was the FBIs FISA approval judge, and the U.S. DC Judge in the Flynn pleading.
The story has disappeared into the swamp; but the story is important.
There is a very strong possibility that U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras was forcibly recused by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, because Contreras is also the FISA Court Judge who signed-off on the 2016 FISA application (warrant) that led to the wiretapping and surveillance of General Flynn. That FISA application is now being questioned.
p
When are Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama going to be questioned about their anti-@realDonaldTrump Dossier?
1:27 PM · Jan 28, 2018
https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/957681446730256384?s=17
Flynn should seek a reversal. There is enough on the table now.
I was thinking the same thing...
perhaps after the memo is release,,
can you imagine the tears at CNN with the breaking news “Flynn backs out of Mueller deal” and pleads not guilty to all charges
ADDING ANOTHER SUNDANCE ARTICLE FROM TODAY RATHER THAN TOCREATE A NEW POST:
Oh Lordy, Destruction of Evidence Important Interview Between Bob Goodlatte and Maria Bartiromo
Posted on January 28, 2018 by sundance
House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte appears on Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo to discuss his ongoing investigation into the DOJ and FBI. Chairman Goodlatte holds primary oversight authority over the entire Justice Department.
Part of the conversation turns very interesting, and provides an indicator into the next phase, when Bartiromo mentions messages between FBI Agent Peter Strzok and DOJ Attorney Lisa Page surrounding an intent to destroy evidence, during their participation in the Clinton investigation. WATCH:
This corrupt judge was in on the fix.
He did not remove himself.
He WAS removed.
I thought we had a good report on this recusal cause the week it happened. Shy is Sundance a month behind?
How would Roberts know about this? Sounds like BS.
Everything connected to this will soon be proven to be fruit of a poison tree.
“How would Roberts know about this? Sounds like BS.”
I believe the CJ appoints the FISC judges and that they report to him.
Roberts has been keeping a real low profile for quite a while now.
NEW INFO, imo..
BTW,
here’s a good twitter link “who is John P. Carlin?”
https://twitter.com/1mjas/status/957701577489506304
(It was recently reported by a former Prosecutor that John P Carlin is actually the one who signed the submission to FISA judge Rudolph Contreras.)
Almost as low a profile as Her Heinous.
100%.
Trivia Question: What's the difference between our corrupt judges and corrupt judges in the S-hole of Nigeria?
Ours don't have the funny wigs.
So many spouses and paramours in this mess,where does Mrs.Contrers work?
Is she a power player?
Same question for Ted Chaung?
There is a very strong possibility that U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras was forcibly recused by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts,
Now look for the spouse of Mary McCord. Are the members of the public being snookered again?
I have mentioned this before. Keep this judges name in current memory. He needs to be investigated to find out his Deep sate involvement.
Judge Rudolph Contreras
Holy thank yous, Batman11
“The court’s judges are appointed solely by the Chief Justice of the United States without confirmation or oversight by the U.S. Congress. This gives the chief justice the ability to appoint like-minded judges and create a court without diversity.”
United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Court
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.