Posted on 01/22/2018 3:59:44 PM PST by RoosterRedux
This entire shutdown exercise was Schumers attempt to put Trump in his place. He failed spectacularly.
Jan 22 2018 14:16:08 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: f2d4bd 127256
>>127246
Thank you for visiting the WH. FEAR.
Q
580
Jan 22 2018 14:13:04
Q
!UW.yye1fxo ID: f2d4bd 127218
Private exchange [last].
Q
381
Jan 22 2018 14:05:49
Q
!UW.yye1fxo ID: f2d4bd
127154
:stay at home<
[-7]
DR_noon_clear_sky^
Safe comms_SAT-re_Bz985300^00
Q
Jan 21 2018
578
Jan 21 2018 22:32:11
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: fe774d
121147
Every [3] letter is here.
You are in the middle of some
thing historic. Q
577
Jan 21 2018 22:20:15
Anonymous ID: c4d817
120926
GUYS- email was sent out by NSA before election with some plausible deniability attached to it so people could say "FAKE"! HOWEVER, the main audience wasn't normies, it was the black hats, a shot across the bow to say "WE HAVE IT ALL, YOUR'E RIGGING WON'T WORK". Q just brought it back up to speak directly to "THEM" again to show they are going to dump it all.
I agree, and I think the way you put is is just right.
These folks want(ed) to abdicate, in deference to the U. N. and other globalist nonsense.
The greater American Union is something they wanted real bad. They met for years, once a year to bring that into reality.
I’m not sure how much of it is in place, but I’d not be surprised if we’d be shocked to know how far along it is.
Good points. I’d actually be thrilled to believe in Q. All I ask is something more than a photo of a plane window, or a prediction that fails to materialize.
The insults get old, too. People who are spreading the truth do just that: they spread the truth. People propping up a hoax go straight to the insults. I’ve seen the same pattern often—as with global warming, for instance. Rather than polite debate, they label anyone who disagrees a deniar, and try to get their funding cut.
I agree, and that alone is worth the price of admission.
These folks thought they had already done the heavy lifting toward One World Odor.
Reagan and Trump both put that on the skids to nowhere.
denier
If you're not willing to listen that is fine you don't have to"
"People are lining up to tell me that Q hasnt made any notable revelations or accurate predictions. I already knew that"
I'm going to report you as a Troll. This thread is about Qanon. If you're willing to learn about it that is fine. If you're here to mock then you're by definition a Troll.
Freerepublic and the administrators has had a very poor record in my opinion of issues that takes a lot to understand after the 9/11 conspiracy bullshit that hit the site.
I've given up Freerpublic ever going back to a free and open site for communication as it once was before 9/11.
I have attempted a number of times to explain Qanon which most of those threads have been banned or locked.
Qanon isn't as simple as reading one line of text and realizing this guy is real. Julian Assange has been very open about who Qanon is.
If you're not willing to listen or read. We can't help you.
I do expect Qanon threads will eventually end up in the trash on freerepublic. Simply because of Trolls like yourself and the admins not willing to monitor them. They don't like "this stuff"
I can't post on Freerepublic about new ideas. The 9/11 conspiracies BS has forced the admins to over monitor new ideas. It's as simple as that.
I used to really love this place. Now I can't even talk about new ideas. It saddens me
If it wants my support, it will have to earn it, starting with building trust.
Pretty sure it doesnt even know you exist, let alone wanting your support.
Probably could care less about you personally, given his/her mission.
It is what it is.
I dont know if it is true or false. It certainly fits into my world view about Cankles and Zero and is fun reading. Time will tell.
If you didnt care, you wouldnt be playing the troll.
Play away. Perfectly fine by me.
Every great story needs an antagonist.
Best.
So now questioning Q is grounds to ban someone?
Really?
If you can get everyone that questions Q banned, will that make you happy?
There a statistical evidence that he can't be anything other then they claim. In order to show statistical evidence you would have to go over a lot of materiel.
You're questions are worded to mock and not to understand.
We've just been asking for what evidence do you have that Q is worth following. So far, when carefully looked at, such as the thread last night, whatever evidence is provided is proven false under accurate analysis.
Somebody even dared to to compare Q to Christ a few posts up. Outrageous, and where are your miracles?
We have open minds. But we aren't giving our devotion to false prophets.
Who does Assange say Qanon is?
Man, I can’t imagine anyone having to hold their nose and vote for him, looking at his platform and that of Hillary Clinton.
One of the things I noticed about him, was that from his announcement on, he very seldom changed any policy. The only sure-fire one I know of, was that one day when he backtracked after saying the day before it was a great idea for the members of Islam to relocate here.
Someone set him straight on that, and within 24 hours he had corrected himself.
That was enough for me to know he meant what he was saying.
I gladly voted for they guy.
It could have new .mil laser payload that fries ‘em in orbit. It’s been back up for.... four months now?
I agree. For example Jeff Sessions is recused. Yet Q wants us to trust Sessions that he's doing something.
In that scenario, Q would be an adversary.
“So now questioning Q is grounds to ban someone?”
Questioning and doubting is one thing. Constantly stalking and taunting others is what should get you and the bunch of you pulled out. I would compare you all to high school bullies who taunt everyone you don’t like. Go kick your dog or something just Go away-
Ind said, "Who does Assange say Qanon is?"
Corrected. Sorry... I'm not perfect
My guess is that they all work for the Obama/Hillary dark hats team. Infiltrators.
Oh, my. FReepers distrusting cryptic anonymous posts found on on anonymous blogger sites on the internet? Whoever heard of such thing?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.