Posted on 12/13/2017 6:54:00 AM PST by x1stcav
When men are being their sexual selves, drawn to a womans beauty, theyre not exploiting women. Theyre responding to them. The women are the fire, drawing a man toward their feminine heat.
This is true even for all those beautiful women who hook up with rich, powerful menthe arm candy. I was watching a Premier League soccer match the other day, and the camera focused on one of the rich owners and his wife. He was short, old, and terribly unattractive. She was a foot taller than him, with long blond hair and legs for miles. She was dressed in a fur, and diamonds graced her fingers. She didnt look miserable at all. In fact, she looked like the cat who ate the canary. One has to ask, who here is actually exploiting whom?
(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...
Why do you suppose that is?
I mean: Shouldn't all of the men in ancient times who consistently "misread the signals," wouldn't take "no" for an answer, and proceeded full speed ahead despite the female's objections have eventually been bred out of the gene pool, leaving only perfect gentleman capable of picking up on the slightest negative nuances and beating a hasty retreat?
No, wait - That doesn't make sense!
Regards,
No problem: Call a plumber!
Regards,
They’re kind of like polar bears. All cute and cuddly to look at, but get too close... they’ll eat you alive.
There are no easy answers, but I've been married 44 years to the same women, and I found her singing in the church choir. There was another girl there, though, that I had dated previously that so much was not the one. :)
I believe you meant ‘sync’. :-) Thank me.
Every sperm is sacred;
Every sperm is great;
If a sperm is wasted;
God gets quite irate.
I suspect going where the good women go is harder for a busy lawyer, hence the resort to a dating website. I’m in a much different position, married for many years and not looking, but I’ve been young, rich, and single, and actively working not to make my precise financial status obvious (while also making it clear that I had a comfortable, steady income).
If they can get a man without sex, then perhaps they would prefer it. If the only way to keep a man interested in having them around is via sex, then that might change their attitude.
I'm pretty sure that Donald Trump has a sex life with Melania. Anthony Quinn managed to father a couple of kids, one at age 78, and another at 82, with his girlfriend (who was 33 when she had the younger kid).
The mother of Clint Eastwood's youngest daughter was 28 (and he was 63) when she had the kid. He later married her and stayed with her for 18 years.
I used to know a guy who would say “Damn! Her legs go from the ground all the way up to her ass!”
The girls on the Victoria’s Secret fashion show last night sure acted like they wanted to be ogled. Just a few less threads and they would have been naked. And no doubt they’d go full nude or see-thru if asked. But don’t you dare stare, you old pervert!
“How do you find the right man when the wrong men swarm?”
That is probably a challenge for intelligent women in the “Unicorns” region of the “Hot Crazy Matrix”. I don’t know if there is an efficient answer.
It all depends on WHAT the women are targeting him FOR. Dodging entrapment can get tiring after a while.
And you, Madame Defarge, are one of my favorite fictional heroins/terrorists of all time! :)
Once in a while I come up with a lucid thought! ;)
So she has no feet? Is her name Peggy?
Buzz off. I’m tired of your nonsensical stuff.
First of all, there used to be arranged marriages, for peoples all over the world, so whether one wanted to or not...they got married.
Prostitution was not outlawed and Temple ( in Ancient Greece ) priestess had sexual congress with men, as a sacrament.
Then there is the JUS PRIMAE NOCTIS/DROIT DU SEIGEUR of Medieval times, when the feudal lords got "first dibs" on all of the peasant virgins, especially on their wedding day.
Add to the above, was the "KNIGHTLY RULES OF CONDUCT", where any knight could rape/have his way with any girl of a lower class, but he had to be circumspect with girls and women of his class and above.
Times change, but some men have always been cads and bounders!
Amongst the European aristos ( and also in wealthy American homes ) the male head of the the house and some of the sons, dalliances with maids and governesses used to be ( and in some cases still is! ) pretty common.
OTOH, what I was referring to is that in recent times, in America, old manners, morals, and rules have broken down and so, neither sex seem to pick up on/see correctly "interest" signals.
And what was once NEVER seen as "abuse" or harassment ( a man telling a woman that she looked nice, smelled good, was pretty...whatever ), now is, by some idiot females.
But yes...men SHOULD always take "NO" for an answer and back off/stop whatever they are doing! OTOH,many of today's girls/women don't know how or when to say "NO"!
And then there are the girls/women who now claim "rape" when they initiated something and then are sorry afterwards, make false claims, and/or, like the males in their age contingents, have absolutely NO idea what dating and courting is supposed to be like, so never figure out what the "signals" mean and perhaps haved no idea how ro send them.
You don't !
Sorry for the typo.
Posted too quickly, didn't check before I hit the send button, and yes, of course I meant sync.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.