Posted on 12/10/2017 9:58:46 AM PST by Kaslin
In an extensive piece published by The Intercept on Saturday, co-founder of the news site Glenn Greenwald excoriated CNN (as well as a host of other news outlets) for recklessly advancing agenda driven stories involving the Russia investigation, with no transparency when the stories blow up in their face and go viral with fake news.
Greenwald began by noting how “Friday was one of the most embarrassing days for the U.S. media in quite a long time.”
“The humiliation orgy was kicked off by CNN, with MSNBC and CBS close behind, with countless pundits, commentators and operatives joining the party throughout the day,” he continued colorfully. “By the end of the day, it was clear that several of the nation’s largest and most influential news outlets had spread an explosive but completely false news story to millions of people, while refusing to provide any explanation of how it happened.”
In chronicling the events of Friday, Greenwald mocked CNN for claiming to be “the most trusted name in news.” In the CNN story in question, the outlet claimed two unnamed sources told them that Donald Trump Jr. was e-mailed the WikiLeaks documents before they were published for the world. “As CNN sees the world, this would prove collusion between the Trump family and WikiLeaks and, more importantly, between Trump and Russia, since the U.S. intelligence community regards WikiLeaks as an “arm of Russian intelligence,” and therefore, so does the U.S. media,” he explained.
Despite the fact that CNN couldn’t identify the person who sent a link to Don Jr., their “tone of excitement, breathlessness and gravity the network conveyed” was quite apparent. “There was just one small problem with this story: it was fundamentally false, in the most embarrassing way possible,” Greenwald wrote. They claimed the e-mail was sent on September 4, 2016, when it was actually sent 10 days later.
CNN has refused to discuss how the mix-up happened. But according to Greenwald, the journalist who broke the story, Congressional reporter Manu Raju, didn’t tweet a correction until hours later and spoke in “muted tones” when talking about it on the air. Raju admitted that neither he nor anyone at CNN had actually had seen the e-mails but were relying on the descriptions from those who had seen it.
And CNN has so far refused to out the sources of their terrible information, claiming they were not intentionally trying to deceive the outlet. “How is it remotely plausible that multiple sources could all innocently and in good faith misread the date in exactly the same way, all to cause to be disseminated a blockbuster revelation about Trump/Russia/WikiLeaks collusion,” Greenwald wondered of CNN. And since CNN refused to say where they got the information from, he said: “CNN refuses to provide the most minimal transparency to enable the public to understand what happened here.”
For Greenwald, CNN’s fake news story had three major problems. The first was the fact that it spread like wildfire throughout social media before they issued their correction. “No Russian Facebook ad or Twitter bot could possibly have anywhere near the impact as this CNN story had when it comes to deceiving people with blatantly inaccurate information,” Greenwald quipped.
Second, CBS and MSNBC both claimed they were able to “independently confirm” what CNN had reported was indeed accurate when it was anything but. Greenwald described the analysis from MSNBC’s Ken Dilanian on the subject as “Baghdad-Bob-level embarrassing.”
His third problem with the story was how “this type of recklessness and falsity is now a clear and highly disturbing trend – one could say a constant – when it comes to reporting on Trump, Russia and WikiLeaks.”
The media’s credibility took serval compounding blows last week in a cascade of fake news stories involving Trump and Russia. Greenwald identified that “major media outlets have made humiliating, breathtaking errors on the Trump/Russia story, always in the same direction, toward the same political goals.” And he warned how those in Russia opposed to Putin were being damaged by their reckless reporting. “U.S. media’s unhinged, ignorant, paranoid reporting on Russia is harming their cause in all sorts of ways,” he said.
Greenwald concluded by chiding the likes of CNN’s Brian Stelter and other in the media who “are very good at demanding respect.” “But journalists also have the responsibility not just to demand respect and credibility but to earn it. That means that there shouldn’t be such a long list of abject humiliations, in which completely false stories are published to plaudits, traffic and other rewards, only to fall apart upon minimal scrutiny,” he stated.
The leaks are coming from Democrats on the intel committee and CNN will never cop to it since they have been caught red handed.
No bias in the headline at newsbusters. Oh, nevermind.
I don’t believe this is reckless reporting on the part of CNN. They are reporting exactly what their sources are giving them, but I believe the sources are being given bad information. And when they leak it is a huge RED FLAG of fake news appears. I believe it is a sting and “they” know exactly what “bad” information they are giving to the sources ... don’t kid yourself, they have the list now. I’m betting it is an inside sting on the Gang of 8 by the IG. Will probably show up in his report in January. (Hey, if CNN can take a daily SWAG, why can’t I? :-) I bet Adam S is not sleeping so well these days!
CNN should be hammered endlessly on its “sources” for this fraud on the public.
I do not agree with some who are saying the CNN reporter simply made up the wrong date. That would not begin to explain what is so “interesting” about this Democrap screw-up.
I do believe that CNN is telling the truth about this much, that “two” sources were giving the CNN guy the same basic (incorrect) info.....
They were most assuredly Democrat sources within the House Intelligence Committee leadership or staff. Rep. Adam Schiff is an obvious candidate, along with some of his colleagues and staffers.
I also don’t think it makes any sense at all that someone from the Democrat (or MSM) side INTENTIONALLY put out the wrong date. That makes no sense at all since the temporary spike in “Trump scandal” would be quickly followed by the embarrassment of being shown to be so wrong. Someone got the date wrong either due to a “sting” operation or possibly simply due to rank carelessness that then got circulated among Democrap insiders.
THAT is what we must get to the bottom of, who is leaking from the House Intel Committee..... were they given the wrong date in a sting operation, or was it careless typing from someone in their circle who was sending out an email blast to their “team” or what????
“The leaks are coming from Democrats on the intel committee“
Schif or one of his lackeys.
L
All those who saw it on the WORLD WIDE WEB never saw the correction. And that’s exactly what CNN intended.
You post that picture as if I should know who it is. I have no idea.
Their sources were provided false information on purpose, to identify them as sources of the leak.
Yes, I said it was probably a sting operation.... although given the slovenly minds at work in the Demoncrap Party I don’t rule out the possibility that someone mis-wrote or mis-typed the date and then the wrong info was getting circulated among Democrat pols and staffers.
Anyway, someone gave the wrong info to CNN, who ran with it, and this whole thing needs to be unpacked and fully exposed.
https://theintercept.com/2017/12/09/the-u-s-media-yesterday-suffered-its-most-humiliating-debacle-in-ages-now-refuses-all-transparency-over-what-happened/
Greenfield presents a great story.
___
Right..... I don't think it's correct to call Greenfield a "lefty".
Fabulists spinning fabulous yarns. Entertainment for the weak minded, not news.
See his post above the picture, then see my post # 16 to him
I’ve never heard of Glenn Greenfield, but then I don’t watch the drive-by news media like you obviously do.
"The humiliation orgy was kicked off by CNN, with MSNBC and CBS close behind, with countless pundits, commentators and operatives joining the party... By the end of the day, it was clear that several of the nation’s largest and most influential news outlets had spread an explosive but completely false news story to millions of people, while refusing to provide any explanation of how it happened... tone of excitement, breathlessness and gravity the network conveyed" was quite apparent. "There was just one small problem with this story: it was fundamentally false, in the most embarrassing way possible," Greenwald wrote... Congressional reporter Manu Raju... admitted that neither he nor anyone at CNN had actually had seen the e-mails but were relying on the descriptions from those who had seen it... "How is it remotely plausible that multiple sources could all innocently and in good faith misread the date in exactly the same way, all to cause to be disseminated a blockbuster revelation about Trump/Russia/WikiLeaks collusion," Greenwald wondered of CNN.Yeah, that's a real stumper. Wait! I know -- check with Politifact! Or Factcheck dot org! Or Snopes! Or Media Matters! Why, I bet there's even a whole chapter in "What Happened" that shows that fake media stories being disseminated by the DNC and uncritically repeated by the ever-compliant media helped defeat Hitlery! /sarc
It’s Greenwald, not Greenfield.
I met him online at the old Compuserve Town Hall forum about 20 years ago. I doubt that he remembers me. We got along OK. I don’t know about him being a leftist. He seemed more libertarian back then. He was a gay activist then and I believe he still is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.