Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Flynn FBI plea deal opens pathway to Donald Trump: Judge Napolitano
Fox ^ | 12/1/17 | Julia Limitone

Posted on 12/01/2017 11:09:45 AM PST by SoFloFreeper

....The FBI’s evidence against the former general could put him in prison for 60 years, but making a plea deal could reduce his sentence to six to twelve months, Judge Andrew Napolitano, Fox News senior judicial analyst, told FOX Business’ Stuart Varney.

Napolitano said Flynn may have shortened his sentence by offering federal prosecutors some kind of link to Trump or someone within the administration.

“Sometime between Monday and today, they reduced that deal to writing. [Flynn] has real evidence that we can really use to prosecute someone, perhaps the president, we don’t know, and in order to lock the general in they got him to plead guilty this morning,” Napolitano said on “Varney & Co.”

(Excerpt) Read more at foxbusiness.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: balderdash; flynnpleadeal; hype; judgenap; media; michaelflynn; tds; trumprussia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

1 posted on 12/01/2017 11:09:45 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

In the non-crime of collusion?


2 posted on 12/01/2017 11:11:10 AM PST by gundog (Hail to the Chief, bitches.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

The FBI’s evidence against the former general could put him in prison for 60 years...


What is she talking about? Is that hyperbole?


3 posted on 12/01/2017 11:11:55 AM PST by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm male.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I’m surprised this guy Napolitanp ever had a legal career at all, based on the quality of some of the legal analysis he’s done on Fox over the years.


4 posted on 12/01/2017 11:12:33 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Sorry Judge Nap, but you are way wrong.


5 posted on 12/01/2017 11:13:11 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I am putting more faith and credibility in the analysis of Gregg Jarrett.


6 posted on 12/01/2017 11:14:31 AM PST by edie1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Flynn’s credibility as a witness is completely destroyed now that he’s been convicted specifically for lying. To be trusted again he would need verifiable audio or video evidence that may not even be admissible.


7 posted on 12/01/2017 11:14:47 AM PST by Golden Eagle (Donald Trump: "There's a lot of people disappointed in the Justice department, including me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

the guys an imbecile...hes wrong on almost everything he comments on.


8 posted on 12/01/2017 11:15:02 AM PST by basalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

They are telling a man to lie about the President if he wants to save his own skin. The Civil War is almost here people.

Remember Ben Franklin when it comes time to properly end Progressivism: “We must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately.”


9 posted on 12/01/2017 11:15:21 AM PST by Bryanw92 (Asking a pro athlete for political advice is like asking a cavalry horse for tactical advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Shock Jock, only.


10 posted on 12/01/2017 11:15:27 AM PST by Golden Eagle (Donald Trump: "There's a lot of people disappointed in the Justice department, including me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I agree.

He's approaching carnival barker territory with me.

11 posted on 12/01/2017 11:15:40 AM PST by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

The Logan Act makes it criminal for any unauthorized citizen to negotiate with any foreign power against the interests of the USA.

When Flynn did so, Trump had been elected but not sworn in. That’s the kicker.

Then, Flynn lied to the FBI about those contacts, another crime.

Additionally, Flynn was not registered as a foreign agent, and that’s against the law also, to negotiate on behalf of a foreign power.

The FBI did wiretap a few calls between Flynn and the Russians but there was only very minimal incrimination.

But, Kislyak and other Russians were reporting back to Russia, contacts of a much more substantial nature that were clear violations of the Logan Act, that happened before Trump was sworn in.

So, the FBI figured out that Flynn was meeting with the Russians in person to avoid FBI eavesdropping, that’s what Flynn lied about. Instead of about 4 conversations with the Russians, there were about 30, mostly face to face, no records.

In fact, the Russians agreed to change their tactics at the UN because of an agreement with Flynn and his Trump contacts, before Trump was sworn in, that’s against the law, the Logan Act.

Additionally, Flynn was not registered as a foreign agent, and that’s against the law also, to negotiate on behalf of a foreign power.

Whomever, on the Trump transition team was Flynn’s handler is in big, big trouble. If Trump was told about any of these goings on before he was sworn in, he was obligated to tell the Justice Dept./FBI.

If not, that’s conspiracy and/or obstruction of justice. It may seem petty, because if they had waited just a couple of weeks, all these contacts would have been completely legal.


12 posted on 12/01/2017 11:15:57 AM PST by gandalftb (OK State, Go Cowboys!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb
What exactly did Flynn do with the Russians that was "against the interests of the USA" in this case?

As with the Manafort indictment, I have a suspicion that Flynn's biggest crimes relate to his dealings long before December 2016.

13 posted on 12/01/2017 11:18:25 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I’ve said all along that innocence is no defense against a politicized prosecution. It’s naive to think it is. All the prosecutor needs are a couple canaries that will sing. Tweet tweet tweet chirp tweet. And the highest of the mighty can be besmirched and made to fall. This has been known for thousands of years. And this is why I’ve been requesting president trump to please shut this farce of an investigation down If it won’t go after the real criminals ( including imho sorozNazi HilLIARy obammy and pelousy and Debbie the washsreoman) then it needs to be replaced by a new prosecutor that will


14 posted on 12/01/2017 11:19:14 AM PST by faithhopecharity (“Politicians aren’t born, they’re excreted.” - Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

The truth of the matter is that Trump firing Gen Flynn for comments to Pence was a huge mistake.


15 posted on 12/01/2017 11:19:22 AM PST by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

Delusion probably. Max five year sentence.

Looks to me like Flynn and Manafort were working angles of their own, Clinton-style.


16 posted on 12/01/2017 11:19:35 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

rumor I have heard around the internet is that is Jared kushner the son in law... question is did Trump know and can they prove it...


17 posted on 12/01/2017 11:19:39 AM PST by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Napolitano seems to get everything wrong. However, it’s possible that Flynn, a guy who was fired because he lied to the Vice President and pleading guilty for lying to the FBI, could make up anything about Trump. And, because this case could not constitutionally go to trial to cross-examine their star witness, the testimony of a proven liar would be the ‘rats case for articles of impeachment.


18 posted on 12/01/2017 11:19:46 AM PST by MountainWalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb
P.S. -- It sounds to me as if the December 2016 conversations with the Russians involved asking them not to take a strong adversarial position against the U.S. regarding the sanctions that were imposed on them. How is that "against the interests of the USA?"
19 posted on 12/01/2017 11:19:57 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: longfellowsmuse

Kushner was the lead contact with the Russians and Israeli’s. I agree with you, Kushner has a big problem.

BTW, the FBI knew that Flynn was reporting back to Mar-A-Lago. They likely had a FISA tap and Kushner was the highest authority on the transition team and was living there.


20 posted on 12/01/2017 11:22:33 AM PST by gandalftb (OK State, Go Cowboys!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson