Skip to comments.
Science proves kids are bad for Earth. Morality suggests we stop having them.
NBC News ^
| November 15, 2017
| Travis Rieder
Posted on 11/15/2017 11:54:55 AM PST by C19fan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: ek_hornbeck
Have you ever noticed how "environmentalists" who complain about too many people never want to do anything to restrict massive Third World immigration, without which US and European population growth would be near zero. Nor do they ever complain about Third World people having too many children.
So true.
To: C19fan
let me guess...just white people. India and and the middle easterns, carry on
22
posted on
11/15/2017 12:12:36 PM PST
by
ronniesgal
(still winning !!)
To: C19fan
Do these geniuses have no notion of their own selfish continuing strain on Mother Gaia? Have they no cliffs nearby?
23
posted on
11/15/2017 12:14:24 PM PST
by
lastchance
(Credo.)
To: C19fan
Instead of limiting ALL breeding, there is another option.
We simply convince everyone with an IQ of lower than, say, 85, to voluntarily walk into a government run booth. There is a bright flash, and a pile of ashes. It's called eugenics.
Democrats and their various voting blocks will sorta take it in the shorts, but I'm sure they will understand, since it's for the Common Good. We could tag them as "Anti-Gaia".
We could throw in SAT scores, and ACT scores along with ASVAB, sort of a combination deal, and convince all the college students that the booth is a "safe space". Anyone that stupid would be a prime candidate...
24
posted on
11/15/2017 12:14:25 PM PST
by
jonascord
(First rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you do not know you are in the Dunning-Kruger club.)
To: C19fan
To: C19fan
Having a two year old is like running a food blender with the top off.
26
posted on
11/15/2017 12:15:55 PM PST
by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~)
To: C19fan
All kidding aside. Just decades ago such amoral philosophy would not have seen the light of day in any mainstream publication or news outlet. It would be considered akin to praising the Nazis for their foresight in reducing Germany’s post WWII economic burden by a bold plan of population resettlement and eradication of certain persons during the war years.
27
posted on
11/15/2017 12:17:57 PM PST
by
lastchance
(Credo.)
To: C19fan
Liberals should stop having children.
28
posted on
11/15/2017 12:18:29 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
To: Vaquero
It is disgusting to refer to any human being as a breeder.
29
posted on
11/15/2017 12:19:10 PM PST
by
lastchance
(Credo.)
To: jonascord
...and convince all the college students that the booth is a "safe space". Anyone that stupid would be a prime candidate...
30
posted on
11/15/2017 12:19:16 PM PST
by
BlueLancer
(ANTIFA - The new and improved SturmAbteilung)
To: SkyDancer
31
posted on
11/15/2017 12:20:17 PM PST
by
lastchance
(Credo.)
To: jonascord
The BBC Dr. Who spin off “Torchwood” broached that topic. The show message was how horrible that decision was but I thought it was making the best of a list of horrible choices.
32
posted on
11/15/2017 12:20:27 PM PST
by
C19fan
To: C19fan
RINOcraps are bad for the earth, can we get rid of them?
33
posted on
11/15/2017 12:20:34 PM PST
by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Trump: Greatest POTUS of all time solely for preventing Satan from taking office.)
To: IronJack
The implications that the “wealthy”, i.e. anyone in the first world, use much more resources than people in turd world countries.
34
posted on
11/15/2017 12:20:36 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
To: C19fan
As if this is a new idea.
"If they be like to die they better do it and decrease the surplus population" Scrooge.
35
posted on
11/15/2017 12:21:16 PM PST
by
DungeonMaster
(Goblins, Orcs and the Undead: Metaphors for the godless left.)
To: C19fan
Interesting that they use the word “environment”.
“Environment” means “a place for life to live”. If no one lives there, it is an ecosystem, not an environment.
36
posted on
11/15/2017 12:26:05 PM PST
by
left that other site
(For America to have CONFIDENCE in our future, we must have PRIDE in our HISTORY... DJT)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Perhaps because we live longer. It could also be because we have more of those resources at our disposal and within our means. Both are a result of a higher standard of living. You would think that a good thing, wouldn’t you? But not Liberals. Oh how they long for the good old days of dung fires, dung huts, and dung dinners.
37
posted on
11/15/2017 12:26:10 PM PST
by
lastchance
(Credo.)
To: C19fan
I guess, ‘Science’ has spoken:
“No more babies for White, Christian, Heterosexual Couples!”
38
posted on
11/15/2017 12:27:03 PM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
To: C19fan
39
posted on
11/15/2017 12:28:31 PM PST
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(Screw The NFL!!!!!! My family fought for the flag!)
To: lastchance
Too bad. There is a movement to remove Americans and Europeans by out breeding us.
40
posted on
11/15/2017 12:29:41 PM PST
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-130 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson