is it one of them there he-shes?
Posted on 11/06/2017 2:11:37 PM PST by detective
Just when one thought the quality of political
discourse could sink no lower, Brazile rescues
the Democrat Party.
Might be true, but if it is, it says a lot about her AND them.
“Unless photoshopped, crazy “lass” needs to use a girdle.”
You haven’t seen the video?!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtFATJLUfsw
All she had to do is get access to Hilary’s lockbox . . .
“I know she wrote that. It’s a figure of speech. IOWs not meant literally.”
I know its a figure of speech. In this case it is also an example of how weak and cowardly the little liberal boys on the Clinton campaign were. It also shows what a jerk Donna Brazile was. It also shows the low level of conversation among insiders in the Clinton campaign.
That in no way means Brazile’s other charges against the Clinton campaign were not true.
That is all very true. I said nothing to indicate that I thought otherwise.
And Brazille is one of the classier Democrats. Reports are that Hillary’s dialog is written by Satan himself.
OMG!! ALL of Hilliary’s aides seem to be GAY or Lesbian and Brazile is a Lesbian.....ICK SQUARED!!
Yes. She’s about as obscene as HilLIARy even ?
Your focus is on the wrong word.
Focus on woman, not christian, then you will understand.
is it one of them there he-shes?
Take a figure of speech out of context
Challenged Clinton’s Top Male Staffers To A Dick Measuring Contest
Not sure how the context would change that.
... in which she claims to have responded to their behavior by challenging the men to expose their genitals.
When in reality the entire thing happened on a conference call...
Brazile claims the sexist behavior occurred during a conference call amidst an argument regarding the possibility of hiring a CEO to rehabilitate the financially struggling DNC. The top male aides dismissed her desire to bring on a CEO because of her gender, she said and responded by challenging their collective phallic endowment.
How could it possibly be anything other than a rhetorical metaphorical challenge in the context of being on a conference call about hiring someone based on gender? Not to mention the context of Brazile not literally having anything to slap down on the table.
Definitely the girdle. Since we already know, what is gained by smacking it in our face again? Sometimes plausible deniability is just kinder.
She was in a room with democrat men.....have you ever met a classy one with power?
She's probably correct.
Democrat males were emasculated long ago.
Thinking Hillary screaming at Donna after the debate was pretty much the trigger.
Who was her contestant, the Mooche?
He probably watched too many 80s teen comedy movies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.