Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The squeeze on Manafort [updated]
Powerline ^ | October 30, 2017 | Scott Johnson

Posted on 10/30/2017 8:25:23 AM PDT by yoe

Politico has posted the ( 12-count indictment) handed up against Paul Manafort and Richard Gates on Friday by the Washington grand jury hearing evidence brought before it by Robert Mueller’s team of all-star prosecutors. The charges all relate or derive from Manafort’s business activities that predate Manafort’s involvement with the Trump campaign (although various related deceptions are alleged to date). I don’t believe that Gates ever had any involvement with the Trump campaign to begin with.

The charges have nothing to do with collusion. As Andrew McCarthy (anticipated) this past August, they are evidently intended to put the squeeze on Manafort to provide evidence against principals in the Trump campaign.

Up-date: A man described as a former foreign policy adviser to Trump’s 2016 campaign has also now been revealed secretly to have pleaded guilty earlier this month to lying to the FBI about his outreach to Russian officials. The former foreign policy adviser is one George Papadopolous, whom I have never previously heard of.

(Excerpt) Read more at powerlineblog.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
The D.C. swamp begats more swamp........
1 posted on 10/30/2017 8:25:23 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yoe

Trying to flip him.

Also controls what he knows about the Podesta Group.


2 posted on 10/30/2017 8:28:38 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

How is a 30 year old a foreign policy advisor? Unless he’s one in a million like Condaleeza Rice or that’s the title they hung on him.


3 posted on 10/30/2017 8:29:48 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Keep indicting more people till one of them makes up a lie about trump and gets immunity
Hasn't that been the plan of the Special Prosecutor from the start?
4 posted on 10/30/2017 8:30:21 AM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Business deals from years before his work with Trump show nothing even close to collusion. Now that the side show is over Mr Mueller, let’s talk about Uraium 1 and the so-called “Trump Dossier” collusion...


5 posted on 10/30/2017 8:30:41 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Squeeze him ,maybe they can get Kevin Spacey ,LOL


6 posted on 10/30/2017 8:30:50 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Can Trump pardon him if bogus charges are brought?


7 posted on 10/30/2017 8:32:40 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: M-cubed

“...Keep indicting more people till one of them makes up a lie about trump and gets immunity...”

The swamp will keep trying. And there is no shortage of LIES about Trump already (understatement). The MSM swamp is already putting Trump’s name into every announcement about Manafort, et al....pursuing the ignorant sector.


8 posted on 10/30/2017 8:33:36 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Mueller’s team is largely investigators who are experienced in financial crimes. If Manafort engaged in money laundering and these guys have unravelled the layers of transfers to various entities, they’ve got him dead to rights, and it would be malfeasant to negotiate a solid case of financial crime that they could prove against testimony that likely would amount to nothing on an unrelated matter (i.e. “Russian collusion”).

Here’s an analogy: Suppose they’d found child porn on his computer while looking for evidence of collusion. There is no doubt they would have charge him with that, even though it was incidental to the collusion investigation. And citizens who don’t believe anyone should be above the law, that’s the way it should be.


9 posted on 10/30/2017 8:34:02 AM PDT by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

My suggestion to Manafort is to immediately release a statement that he is coming out as gay.


10 posted on 10/30/2017 8:35:15 AM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

The pardon to power is there to protect against just such witch hunts. The original intent wasn’t to give drug dealers a second chance despite how people view things today.


11 posted on 10/30/2017 8:38:49 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

ROTFLMAO.
Gay and of Cherokee origins.


12 posted on 10/30/2017 8:39:02 AM PDT by miniTAX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

He can also say that he is donating any ill gotten gains to planned parenthood


13 posted on 10/30/2017 8:39:26 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

From what I’ve seen, Manafort was a legitimate target for a number of reasons — and these indictments seem to support that. They contain references to mortgage fraud allegations that were not included in the charges, and that particular angle may relate to his purchase of a condominium in Trump Tower back around 2008.


14 posted on 10/30/2017 8:39:26 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Assistant vice president at the bank....Foreign Policy Advisor


15 posted on 10/30/2017 8:39:30 AM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

A Presidential pardon is tantamount to admission of guilt.
This actually became an issue with Sheriff ________ (someone jog my memory) recently, when a judge faced some difficulty closing a case involving him precisely for that reason - Trump pardoned him, simultaneously validating grounds for the case, and vindicating him.

If Trump pardons Manafort, that will absolutely be construed by the Left as practical proof that Manafort is guilty of the indictment.


16 posted on 10/30/2017 8:40:55 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

As I understand the case, these are from activities back in 2005. Statue of limitations is 6 years from the later of commission or discovery. Critical to the time line is when the FBI investigated and decided not to prosecute. If the case was started prior to 2012, then the statue of limitations has already run out.


17 posted on 10/30/2017 8:41:26 AM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yoe
It's beyond time to call this what it is - it is NOT an Investigation. It's an INQUISITION!

"We will torture you and your families until you say what we want you to say!"

18 posted on 10/30/2017 8:42:06 AM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (Hillary Clinton: the official candidate of the National Sleep Foundation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

All this just makes me mad at Jeff Sessions. He is the biggest obstacle in getting the Trump agenda accomplished.
I guess the POTUS and VP are having lunch with the AG today. Will be interesting to see if we find out anything that goes on there.


19 posted on 10/30/2017 8:42:14 AM PDT by tinamina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Let the prosecutorial waterboarding begin.


20 posted on 10/30/2017 8:42:24 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Wisdom and education are different things. Don't confuse them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson