Might be best to go with private security.
1 posted on
09/19/2017 11:08:02 AM PDT by
bgill
To: bgill
regardless of the decision, it should not be heralded to the world. Gross stupidity
2 posted on
09/19/2017 11:09:58 AM PDT by
RatRipper
(Unindicted co-conspirators: the Mainstream Media and the Democratic Party)
To: bgill
Is it really wise to make this public?
3 posted on
09/19/2017 11:10:20 AM PDT by
rhinohunter
(Dear Mr. Trump: I'm still not tired of winning)
To: bgill
I wouldn’t do that, not with Hillary walking around free as air.
5 posted on
09/19/2017 11:12:30 AM PDT by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Trump: Greatest POTUS of all time solely for preventing Satan taking office.)
To: bgill
That family MUST have top level security.
If Dn Jr. thinks he and each member of his family isn’t a prime target, he needs to be bitch slapped up side the head.
Privacy is gone Don Jr.
Know that right now.
I DO NOT want terrorists to have a free shot at his family.
6 posted on
09/19/2017 11:12:55 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(DACA: Their dream, our nightmare... will the rule of law prevail or not?)
To: bgill
8 posted on
09/19/2017 11:15:05 AM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: bgill
I hope that’s what they’re doing.
Who on the Trump-Team still ‘doesn’t know’ how much they are hated by the left? Even Javanka have both been forced to admit that the Dems still despise them.
Could the Trump people be trying to provoke an incident that will stop short of anyone actually getting hurt?
A whole lotta psychologic warfare goin’ on here!
To: bgill
Is Mueller putting wires on USSS agents?
11 posted on
09/19/2017 11:17:56 AM PDT by
JohnyBoy
(We should forgive communists, but not before they are hanged.)
To: bgill
Might be best to go with private securityEspecially with Don Jr. With that large family, I'd think it makes them too visible with Secret Service tagging along. It must get in the way of running the family business.
12 posted on
09/19/2017 11:21:02 AM PDT by
grania
(Deplorable and Proud of It!)
To: bgill
A public report like this is almost designed to provoke the crazies on the Left. Don’t want to over analyze this, but this seems more than a little peculiar.
14 posted on
09/19/2017 11:23:58 AM PDT by
Truth29
To: bgill
So they will now ask only for “monitors”? To broadcast this news is poor form and an open invitation for many who wish them harm.
16 posted on
09/19/2017 11:24:45 AM PDT by
V K Lee
(DJT: "Sometimes by losing a battle you find a new way to win the war. ")
To: bgill
Hillary: Dump the Secret Service? Why didn’t I think of that?
Bill: Who else would have carried your luggage?
Hillary: Oh,right.
17 posted on
09/19/2017 11:25:54 AM PDT by
sparklite2
(I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
To: bgill
Well he's gotta have very strong security, one way or another. Too many ANTIFA terrorists around lately and lets not firget the nutcase James T. Hodgkinson who shot Steve Scalise.
To: bgill
Might not be a good idea....
To: bgill
I am beting he discovered that at least one of his agents on the protective detail was reporting to Hillery and Obbama operatives.
24 posted on
09/19/2017 11:51:09 AM PDT by
PCPOET7
To: bgill
Probably a wise move if they have their own private security. You never know if a Liberal Secret Service agent might set then up for harm.
36 posted on
09/19/2017 1:46:37 PM PDT by
Angels27
To: bgill
And Kellyanne is dropping her security, too? I hope she’s opting for private security she can trust instead of Obama’s SS.
To: bgill
Based on the So So service lately I would go with Gavin DeBecker if money was no object.
38 posted on
09/19/2017 2:00:50 PM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson