Posted on 09/07/2017 3:56:34 PM PDT by mandaladon
Exclusive – Kobach: It Appears That Out-of-State Voters Changed the Outcome of the New Hampshire U.S. Senate Race(Full Title)
For years, the mainstream media has ignored the problem of voter fraud and belittled those of us who are trying to do something about it. And when secretaries of state like me identify cases of fraud, we are told that the number of incidents of voter fraud is too insignificant to matter. Now, however, facts have come to light that indicate that a pivotal, close election was likely changed through voter fraud on November 8, 2016: New Hampshire’s U.S. Senate Seat, and perhaps also New Hampshire’s four electoral college votes in the presidential election.
New Hampshire is one of fifteen states that allow same-day voter registration. The benefit of same-day registration is that it allows a person who has procrastinated or has forgotten to register to nonetheless cast a ballot on election day. The downside of same-day registration is that it does not allow the state time to assess the eligibility of the voter. A volunteer poll worker simply accepts a modicum of identification and takes the voter at his word that he’s a U.S. citizen resident of the state who is eligible to vote.
New Hampshire is also a battleground state. Unlike neighboring Massachusetts and Vermont, which reliably vote for the Democrat in presidential elections, New Hampshire can swing either way. It has long been reported, anecdotally, that out-of-staters take advantage of New Hampshire’s same-day registration and head to the Granite State to cast fraudulent votes.
Now there’s proof.
According to statistics released by the Speaker of the New Hampshire House of Representatives, on the date of the general election in November 2016, there were 6,540 same-day registrants who registered to vote in New Hampshire using an out-of-state driver’s license
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Assuming the 5 or 6,000 figure is right, that would be statewide, so let’s give 3k phony votes in each of the two districts. Problem in NH-1st is that Trump carried that CD. Guinta lost by 5,000 votes and add to that, a disgruntled Dem took almost 10% of the vote, and probably out of Che Porter. Removing 3k from Porter’s total and she still wins. Guinta was damaged.
Ayotte’s loss probably resulted from fraud, however, there may have been enough disgruntled Trump Conservatives in the state to have not bothered to vote for her. I will bet had she stayed strong, supported the nominee, she would’ve overcome the fraud. She just really never gained solid traction in the state with the voters, trying to pander to the left got her nowhere. It’s astonishing that even a Republican district, Democrats today will vote hard-left without bothering to try to appeal to the right (witness Porter or loons like Tim Walz in MN), but Republicans feel this deep-seated need to be liked by the left and go pandering to them even when it is likely to cost them from their own base.
This pandering crap needs to stop. Vote right, let the chips fall where they may. If you win, great. If you lose, you died with your boots on and your reputation is sterling with your supporters and you can run for something else, get a job with the administration or something else entirely.
Now just cotton pickin’ minit here. Let’s be fair. Everybody knows that all the out-of-state voters in New Hampshire were sent by Vladimir Putin to vote for Trump, and only because Hillary and Hasan were so overwhelmingly popular in New Hampshire did they eke out a narrow victory, despite Russia’s interference. That’s it. We got us a smoking gun. No other possible conclusion. Impeach Trump and throw him in the klink right now.
They are probably all college students.
What is the Busch family goal, to further the interests of watered down beer?
Take your meds.
https://medium.com/@HillaryforNewHampshire/voting-as-a-student-in-new-hampshire-c6cef19b0bd1
Read the link above. NH residency requirements are weak.
They should cancel the results of the Senate election and hold a new one.
Well hush my mouth. Those rotten scoundrels trying to steal the presidency. Who would have thought it. I mean an upstanding Arkansas family like the Clintons getting their good name tarnished by some people thinking these folks are crooks
Well hush my mouth. Those rotten scoundrels trying to steal the presidency. Who would have thought it. I mean an upstanding Arkansas family like the Clintons getting their good name tarnished by some people thinking these folks are crooks
Bino. This has been going on for years, and everyone in Red Hampshire knows it.
Or maybe you could start reading.
Says the senile old fool who doesn’t know the difference between the Busch and Bush families.
They changed the spelling of their name when they came here Einstein.
Not true.
Ballot stuffing should be a capital offense. If you are going to vote multiple times, you are attempting to subvert the leadership of this country.
Hillary campaign staffers encouraged their Mass.- and Vermont-based volunteers during the NH primary to take advantage of NH’s same-day registration and claim to have just moved into the state so as to vote in the primary. But surely the number of people who voted illegally in NH in the general election must have been 0, because Democrats have never found a single instance of voter fraud anywhere in the nation. Right?
I hope that NH gets rid of its stupid same-day voter registration, although surely Democrats will call such change in law Racist, since that’s what they call any attempt to make it more difficult to commit voter fraud. And the Senate should investigate the 2016 election returns from NH, and unseat Maggie Hassan if there’s evidence that her election was fraudulent. If the Senate deems that illegal votes provided the margin of victory in the NH Senate election, it should declare a vacancy, permit NH Governor Sununu to fill it with a temporary appointment (I would recommend Ayotte, who was robbed of the seat), and have NH hold a special election for the term that ends in January 2023.
If that occurs, it wouldn’t be the first time that the U.S. Senate declares a NH Senate seat vacant because of inconclusive election results. When Republican Louis Wyman was declared the winner of the 1974 NH Senate election by 2 votes, the heavily Democrat Senate initially didn’t seat anyone, and later declared the seat vacant. This permitted NH’s Republican governor to make a temporary appointment (Cotton Norris, the GOP Senator whose retirement had led to the close election), and NH held a special election for the remainder of the term. This time, Democrat John Durkin (who had been declared the loser by 2 votes the prior November) won handily, and held the seat until January 1981 (he was defeated in Nov. 1980).
So who is surprised? Isn’t this normal dimocrat behavior? If you cannot win legally, cheat, steal, lie, forge, cheat some more, lie some more, then vote. Normal dim procedures. Being going on for decades and decades now.
Ump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.