Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Somebody Help Me!' Nurse Arrested After Refusing to Draw Blood
Time Magazine ^ | 9/1/2018 | AP

Posted on 09/01/2017 10:26:41 AM PDT by varyouga

(SALT LAKE CITY) — A Utah police officer's body camera video shows a hospital nurse being handcuffed after refusing to draw blood on an unconscious patient.

The video taken at University Hospital in Salt Lake City shows nurse Alex Wubbels calmly explaining to Salt Lake detective Jeff Payne that she couldn't draw blood on a patient who had been injured in a car accident. She told the officer a patient was required to give consent for a blood sample or be under arrest. Otherwise, she said police needed a warrant.

The dispute ended with Payne telling the nurse she was under arrest and physically moving her out of the hospital while she screamed.

The Salt Lake Tribune reports Wubbels was not charged. Police have started an internal investigation, but Payne remains on duty.

(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: 127849; arrest; donutwatch; dui; jeffpayne; leo; nurse; police; searchworks; slc; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-307 next last
To: Tammy8

“She was telling him what the hospital policy- based on current law- was in regard to tests for LE. She was not speaking to a doctor about the patient’s medical care, she was speaking with LEO about the legal issue of them getting a blood draw or the results of if one had already been done.”

None of the above is in the article. Thus was in the article:

“She told the officer a patient was required to give consent for a blood sample...”


141 posted on 09/01/2017 2:48:59 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

“ifinnegan is usually rational but, here he does appear to exhibit signs of an I.Q. that is toast....burnt toast...”

Thanks for the back handed compliment.


142 posted on 09/01/2017 2:49:51 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Go on, entrench yourself in an absurd untenable position.

You clearly have no idea of what you are posting.


143 posted on 09/01/2017 2:52:23 PM PDT by Radix (Natural Born Citizens have Citizen parents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Radix

What do you not understand of these words:

“She told the officer a patient was required to give consent for a blood sample...”


144 posted on 09/01/2017 2:56:49 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

“She was referencing in regards to drawing blood for LE. That was obvious. You are just being absurd.”

This is what was written.

“She told the officer a patient was required to give consent for a blood sample “

How was it obvious?

We agree that what the nurse is reported to have said is wrong.

That a patient can have blood drawn without giving permission.

Do you claim a patient cannot have blood drawn while unconscious due to being unable to give permission (assuming no prior contingent permission)?


145 posted on 09/01/2017 3:00:31 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: 4yearlurker

It appears he was in a CYA mode and wanted the victims blood sample to fudge.

...

Why would he want to fudge it?


146 posted on 09/01/2017 3:04:43 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: sarge83
The hospital is not looking to prosecute the patient, you are and their civil rights come into play.

Was anybody looking to prosecute the patient?

147 posted on 09/01/2017 3:06:20 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

She was talking to the police officer, that is what made it obvious she was referencing what the issue was in respect to LE getting blood drawn or results. If she had been talking to a doctor or someone else the law and hospital policy are different.

How about you walk into an ER and ask for test results for just any random patient and see how far you get? Of course the hospital can do them for medical reasons, and their employees can get results, as needed for medical reasons. If anyone else wants them the laws/rules are different.

You are being absurd and you know you are.


148 posted on 09/01/2017 3:06:54 PM PDT by Tammy8 (Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: pnz1

No the patient wasn’t under arrest. He was hit by the person the police were chasing.

...

Not only that, but the patient (victim) was an off duty police officer driving a semi truck (a second job). The officer at the ER was truly requesting the sample for the victim’s own protection, not to prosecute him.


149 posted on 09/01/2017 3:09:00 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare; Alaska Wolf

After reading through this person’s posts it really does seem to be an Alaska Wolf retread. The convoluted logic and circuitous reasoning is the same. Signed up about a year before AW bought the farm.


150 posted on 09/01/2017 3:12:10 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

I read:

“She told the officer a patient was required to give consent for a blood sample...”

There is no qualification there.

You are being absurd in not even recognizing you are in full agreement with me that she can draw blood without the patient’s consent and what is stated in the article, quoted above, is false.


151 posted on 09/01/2017 3:14:05 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

Little Eichmann likes to troll with police state positions.


152 posted on 09/01/2017 3:14:22 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
The officer at the ER was truly requesting the sample for the victim’s own protection, not to prosecute him.

hahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahaha

Yeah, that's real easy to swallow. hahahahahahahahahaha

153 posted on 09/01/2017 3:17:26 PM PDT by zeugma (I live in the present due to the constraints of the Space-Time Continuum. —Hank Green)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

It does not matter what the reason was, what matters is what the law, and hospital policy are in this circumstance. In any case the nurse needed to follow hospital policy, and the law. There was no cause to arrest her.

If the officer was doing it for personal reasons to protect a friend and not even as part of his job, then that would make it even worse that he bullied and arrested the nurse.


154 posted on 09/01/2017 3:18:12 PM PDT by Tammy8 (Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
“She told the officer a patient was required to give consent for a blood sample...”

There is no qualification there.

===

Who did she told? I'll help you.

“She told the officer a patient was required to give consent for a blood sample...”

After reading the above, can you say whether she said that to the officer or to the doctor treating the patient?
155 posted on 09/01/2017 3:19:35 PM PDT by TTFX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Did you read the part where I said the patient was another police officer? Did you see the video of the car hitting his truck?


156 posted on 09/01/2017 3:19:43 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

If the officer was doing it for personal reasons to protect a friend and not even as part of his job,

...

He was there because the police department with jurisdiction asked him to get a blood sample.


157 posted on 09/01/2017 3:20:34 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Utah law is quite clear on this. Law enforcement needs a warrant or an arrest.

Doctors do not.

See the difference?


158 posted on 09/01/2017 3:20:58 PM PDT by Lurker (President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

I don’t understand why the cop would want William Gray’s blood, unless he wants to pin fault for the accident on Gray instead of the perp that was being chased.


159 posted on 09/01/2017 3:20:59 PM PDT by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

The qualification is who she was talking to. You know this. You are being absurd.


160 posted on 09/01/2017 3:22:21 PM PDT by Tammy8 (Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-307 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson