Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Now, now Rick. Apparently, it's not that simple. One would have thought that "....shall NOT be infringed." would be simple too. Guess what.................... "....shall make NO law......" Guess we just ain't that bright to see all the nuances and tonal inflections written therein.
1 posted on 08/15/2017 8:27:17 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: rktman

Sorry BLM leader ,,, your wrong AGAIN !

Black Lives Matter ,,,, Tell Chicago residents ,,,, start there !!!


25 posted on 08/15/2017 8:56:03 AM PDT by Lionheartusa1 ()-: the left has become a black hole in space and time :-()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

If this clown believes that the First Amendment doesn’t protect hate speech, then BlackLivesMatter ought to be the first group to shut up. If giving a nod and a wink to the murder of policemen and the destruction of public and private property isn’t “hate speech”, then what is?


26 posted on 08/15/2017 8:56:50 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
"Hate speech" is code for "political speech I don't like."

Political speech is the exact speech protected by the First Amendment.

28 posted on 08/15/2017 8:59:08 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." --Claire Booth Luce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

You mean Kill Whitey is not protected free speech?


29 posted on 08/15/2017 8:59:45 AM PDT by RummyChick (can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Then I guess he should he should find another job.


30 posted on 08/15/2017 9:02:02 AM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

And of course only the left gets to determine what speech is ‘hate’ speech. And that is definitely any speech that deals with reality rather than the lies and out of control allegations spewed by sjws, snowflakes, professional race baiters etc.


31 posted on 08/15/2017 9:04:23 AM PDT by Let's Roll ("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality" -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

The speech some hate is magically presented as hate speech; dissenting intellectual positions become mental conditions; and contrary opinions are delegitimised – after all, there’s no need to argue with a mad man or woman.
This is censorship by way of intellectual pathology. - Ben Shapiro


34 posted on 08/15/2017 10:09:38 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Last February the Kentucky State Supreme Court struck down a law against panhandling, saying it violated freedom of speech.

Now we have bums begging with their cardboard signs at every major street intersection in Louisville and Lexington, and they are spreading to the smaller towns as well.

The annoying part is that I hear the panhandlers can make $350-$500 a day, more than I earned when I had a job! Something’s not right here, and I wish I could think of a fair solution.


35 posted on 08/15/2017 10:33:08 AM PDT by Berosus (I wish I had as much faith in God as liberals have in government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson