Posted on 06/21/2017 8:46:16 PM PDT by WilliamIII
Dr Robert McClelland held JFK's head as he was operated on after being shot
He drew a sketch based on what he saw that said the bullets came from the front
McClelland later decided Kennedy was shot from in front and behind
He believes the second gunman must have been on the infamous 'grassy knoll'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Mafia Don who was part of the conspiracy to kill JFK.
Jackie O had him whacked for banging Marilyn Monroe.
Just because he wasted so much paper in his attempt to “blow up” the truth doesn’t make any of his theses right.
I'm guessing that you think Bugliosi's book is such a waste of time that you haven't actually read it.
Alternate for you I'm sure. Bugliosi looked at actual evidence. Unlike those conspiracy books you are relying on.
Agreed, too many dead witnesses for my taste. The majority of dissenting witnesses all died between 1963-1966.
Harold Weisberg, Mark Lane and Sylvia Meager all were pioneering critiques of the Warren Commission. Their books are the solid research initially done to disprove the Warren Report. Go with them, avoid the nut jobs.
Mark Lane, in particular, is not solid research. He very much had an agenda and twisted things to fit it.
Cute graphic but “we” have actually overthrown many governments around the world - what’s to keep these really smart people from screwing with our leadership? Just sayin’.
>>If JFK was shot from the front then why wasn’t there a gaping exit wound to the back of his head?
Actually there was, there are photographs of it readily available, and medical personnel confirmations of it.
>> Still early, but I am losing a bit of respect for Bugliosi, a man I have respected for a long time.
Bugliosi’s screed has been torn to pieces by numerous authors who have spent years studying the JFK hit.
RFK lost twice in court trying to deport Marcello who never sought citizenship. So federal agents kidnapped him off the street and released him the hills of Guatemala without a wallet. Thee days later he made his way back to NO. No love lost between him and the Kennedys.
>>Don’t waste your breath. With the Warren Commission groupies, you’re not supposed to believe what your own eyes and common sense tell you.
Well and truly said. There are many people throughout the world who simply cannot disbelieve their government. I’m acquainted with many such people, including members of my own family. It’s also a major reason that countless Democrats continue to vote for the many criminals in that widely discredited organization.
>>You’re a complete jackass. JFK was far to the right of anyone in election 2016. He was a good president.
Well, although his viewpoint may annoy you, it is one that is shared by a significant number of people around the world, and probably more today than at any time since his demise.
>> As the bullet exited Kennedy’s head, a jet of pulverized brain matter followed in the forward direction and acted like a rocket, pushing his head backwards. At the same time a piece of the side of his skull blew off. The backwards movement of his head, combined with the forward motion of the car caused the skull fragment and some pieces of brain to land on the back of the car.
Discredited by many professionals both civilian and military with extensive experience in the interrelated subjects of ballistics and physiopathology.
>>Teddy subjected this country to far more harm than JFK ever did.
Especially in regard to immigration law. Demographics today in America is largely the result of what that fool foisted on the country.
If he was alive today Kennedy would be a right wing Republican.
>>I did read Bugliosi’s book and it was a fascinating piece. Through 20 years of investigative research, he breaks down point by point the evidence in the case against Oswald. I have no doubt Oswald was the shooter.
Of course the mission of Mr. Bugliosi was to confirm the conclusions of the Warren Commission and to proselytize readers of his book to accept its Report. Nothing at all wrong with that I suppose.
>>The frontal shot blew out the back of the skull. The claimed rear shot would have blown off his face.
The Warren Commission covered up what happened, but the actual facts are soon to be revealed, by law.
Both statements are indisputably true.
>>I’ve been there, you have no idea how close all that stuff is together. There is NO way a rifle shot came from the front right.
I too have been there, spent an entire day examining the area from every direction, and came to the conclusion that a rifle shot could easily have come from behind the fence on the grassy knoll.
>>Funny how the second Congressional Committee to investigate the JFK affair, ended up with numerous subpoenaed witnesses “mysteriously” being murdered days or even hours before they were to appear before the Committee. Just coincidence, I guess.....
Also, didn’t that Committee’s Report concede that the relevant evidence indicates the likelihood of a conspiracy, and thus Oswald could have been the patsy that he claimed to be?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.