Posted on 06/11/2017 12:35:15 PM PDT by Bunyan
University of Nairobi – 2017 – Barack Obama 1961 Coast Province Hospital birth certificate procured by Lucas Daniel Smith circulates university campus
University of Nairobi 2017 – The Chancellor’s Court – Featuring Barack Obama’s 1961 Coast Province General Hospital, Mombasa, British Protectorate of Kenya certificate of birth (with footprint).
University of Nairobi 2017 – University Health Services, Chief Medical Officer – Featuring Barack Obama’s 1961 Coast Province General Hospital, Mombasa, British Protectorate of Kenya certificate of birth (with footprint).
[More pictures included...]
(Excerpt) Read more at ohforgoodnesssake.com ...
I’d LOVE for that to happen! Ping me when you see the Wheels of Justice turning on that particular issue.
The Clintons are still walking around FREE, and that Jew-hating POS Jimmy Carter is still wasting oxygen.
But, again, PING me. ;)
The HI and Kenyan narratives have one thing in common: a BC. They also share the exact same fatal weaknesses. Namely, no one in either place remembers Stanley Ann being there.
By remembering her, I’m not talking about pothead Abercrombie’s discredited ‘recollections,’ or the apocryphal tale of Stanley Ann going into labor while bathing in the ocean. I’m talking about actual people—people who can say, ‘This is the house/apt./hut she lived in. This is what she did during the nine mos of her pregnancy.’
There is a gaping black hole, both in HI and in Kenya. Nobody can place her; no one remembers squat.
Here are the arguments for Canada. If she were in a home for unwed mothers, that explains her 7-9 month seeming disappearance off the face of the earth. The point of putting a young woman in the early sixties in such a home was precisely to disappear her until after the delivery.
Stanley Ann’s first appearance after the black hole is in Seattle. This cannot be explained by either the Kenyan or HI scenarios. No way she’d have flown all the way from Kenya with an almost-newborn, only to hop on another plane and, at great, unnecessary expense, relocate to Seattle. Had she flown from Kenya to HI, she’d have stayed there. The university in Honolulu was, after all, her school of choice.
It’s equally ridiculous to posit that she gave birth in HI, then jumped on a plane and migrated to Seattle. There’s zero justification for the myriad extra expenses, plus she wouldn’t have left her school and support group only to be all alone in a strange city/school.
The only rational explanation is that she was sent to Canada to have and give up the baby to adoption. She rashly decided to keep him, which explains why she showed up and temporarily enrolled in Seattle. She actually didn’t want to do a lot of travel with a newborn.
This also explains Granny Dunham’s scramble to register the birth in HI. Some ‘handwritten records,’ existed in Obama’s file prior to the fabricated HI BC. That was granny’s doing; she wanted her grandson to have American citizenship.
I agree with you folks. Canada fits both the timeline and the known facts.
This document has circulated since 2009 and was even entered in as evidence exhibit in federal court (US District Court) in Los Angeles (Ronald Regan Courthouse, CA. ........................... And the outcome was? If you want the real truth, read the papers 75 years from now, it may be fully researched and published correctly by then. That is of course, if they find a way to unseal his records. The best result has already been accomplished. He’s GONE! At best he’s tied with Carter.
WOW! If he was born in Canada I guess he can be known as Stanley’s Pup!!!!!!
Isn’t this the one where the date is MM/DD/YYYY, instead of DD/MM/YYYY ??? ...indicating it’s fake.
Does anybody have other information about that?
It fits like a hand in a glive. Plus Stanley Ann did have an aunt in Canada—her mother’s sister. What role, if any, this woman played is unknown. She would, however, have been a valuable source of information to the Dunhams, as they calculated how best to use the Canadian healthcare system to their advantage.
The Kenyanesian Usurpation was brought to you by BOTH parties.
The Constitution says natural born citizen.
That means one who is naturally an American because they couldn’t be anything else, born here of citizen parents.
Everyone in DC wanted that changed without the hassle of amending the Constitution.
The Senate passed a resolution declaring McCain a natural born citizen because he had TWO citizen parents, even though he was born in Panama.
Then Obama runs and wins based on just being born here, even though he told us on his website he was born a British subject as the result of having a foreign national father.
So the standard went from born here of citizen parents to just TWO citizen parents to just being born here in one election cycle without amending the Constitution.
According to this standard the recently deceased King of Thailand was eligible, he was born in Cambridge MA, as well as every anchor baby with no loyalty to the USA.
This was done intentionally because Rubio (no citizen parents), Cruz (foreign birth, one citizen parent), Jindal (no citizen parents), George P Bush (one citizen parent) and Haley (no citizen parents) were all ineligible and the future of the GOP.
The truth of the Kenyanesian Usurpation will never see the light of day because they ALL cooperated in the violation of the Constitution.
My original birth certificate era 1931 has my footprint. If Obama’s does he may have indeed been foreign born and legitimately claim he is an African-American/s
He had perfect little toes...
To reiterate, the point of homes for unwed mothers in the early sixties was precisely to avoid a scandal. Stanley Ann was most likely not even registered under her real name. Some time ago i received a confidential PM apprising me of the name on Little Barry’s Canadian BC. I was told to keep the info strictly to myself. I don’t even know if it’s absolutely true or not. All I know is that a home for unwed mothers explains the weird, gaping black hole in SA’s history, and nothing else does.
How about getting the passport application now.
Everything.
We must not overlook the apparent rationale for the NBC requirement as regards the POTUS. Since the NBC requirement, in the constitutional sense, applies to only ONE constitutional office, that of the presidency, then a reasonable inference is that there is something singularly unique about the application of natural born citizenry to that position. I would submit that answer is revealed by the definition cited in the 1814 SCOTUS Venus case. The Court, cited the treatise, Law of Nations, authored by Swiss jurist Emmerich De Vatel. Vatel agrees that “The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of PARENTS (note plural usage) who are citizens. Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.”
Like it or not, the founders were patriarchs, not post-modern feminists. They believed that the political influences of the father would weigh most heavily upon the political beliefs of the children. It is my profound belief, and that of some of the finest scholars on the matter that I have read, that the NBC requirement was intended to minimize the likelihood of undue foreign influence on the POTUS, PARTICULARLY from a father owing allegiance to a foreign sovereignty.
Obama, according to his own campaign, was born a citizen of THREE, count them THREE countries from his birth, owing to the British Immigration and Nationality Act of 1948 thru his father. Therefore, he was a citizen of Great Britain, Kenya, and if you accept his dubious birth narrative, a citizen of the US.
The founding fathers of the US, who were born British subjects and NONE of whom were natural born citizens, required a grandfather clause in Article II to allow them to be eligible to assume the office of POTUS. It is utterly inconceivable to me that they would allow someone born in the 20th century has a British citizen to be POTUS, absent a constitutional amendment allowing them consideration to that job. The 14th amendment, according to it’s selfsame authors, Sen. Trumball and Rep. Bingham, explicitly said that it did NOT confer natural born citizenship.
The constitution is not a dictionary. We do not have a definition for high crimes and misdemeanors either, but that has not stopped us from impeachments and Senate trials.
No SCOTUS decision, whether it be Minor vs Happersett, Perkins vs Elg, Wong Kim Ark vs US, or the Venus case has defined an NBC other than having TWO citizen parents and born on the soil of the US. I am not going to define NBC by the ABSENCE of a case saying that another definition also applies.
I fail to understand why so many seem to fear having this Article II NBC issue adjudicated by SCOTUS for a definitive ruling. I and many of us are more than ready for that fight. No matter the outcome, at least the matter will have been dealt with, instead of the almost obligatory obfuscation, ridicule and scorn. I think that in and of itself, is quite revealing.
Good thinking. And that could be verified by looking at past birth certificates in Hawaii!
Didn’t his grandmother work for the SS administration where she was able to steal the SS number of that dead guy from Connecticut, which is why he had a CT SS number.
That was never explained.
He never lived in Connecticut, had a stolen SS number.
That alone is identity theft.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.