Third Incident Reported in Vauxhall Area as Central London is Locked Down

the SUN ^ | 06/03/2017 | Neal Baker

[DoughtyOne]

POLICE are responding to a THIRD suspected attack in the Vauxhall area of south London.

It comes just minutes after London Bridge was struck by a van and knife assault.

And armed cops stormed nearby Borough Market moments later.

A tweet from the Metropolitan Police said: “Officers are now responding to an incident in the Vauxhall area.”

[DoughtyOne]

Yes...

[DoughtyOne]

Well, I can’t rule that out.

I have a natural affinity for the British, but you can’t stop folks from doing what they’ll do, or refusing to do what they refuse to do.

You sure can be sad about the results though.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Londoners are just going to have to live with terror attacks. The mayor they elected said so.

[DoughtyOne]

Makes one wonder if they thought they were electing their Obama, the racial justice warrior.

We saw how that turned out. Obama was the premier race baiter in our nation’s history.

Sure we’ve had vile organizations from the South, but none of them recruited as fast and vast a body of people as Obama did for BLM.

What’s more, it was based on a fraud, and the hatred against Whites was deemed reasoned.

Knock Out game victims were just practically ignored.

The “Just Us” Department had not interest in race rioting and civil rights violations.

Won’t be any different in London. We know which side this guy will wind up on.

[datricker]

I appreciate your thoughtful responses and patience. Life is hard enough without nutzos adding extra carnage. I guess if I was in charge I would probably be one of them. Be well

[DoughtyOne]

Some people become leaders and it sobers them. They modify their quick judgments and come up with something more reasoned.

Others get in there and act like nuts.

You’d probably do fine. You’re reasoned and I think you’d seek good advise and make a good decision.

[DoughtyOne]

BTW, thank you for your nice comments.

You be well too.

“:^)

[caww]

The truth is London police show up ‘after the fact’......and though do the best they can ‘after’ the terrorist hits it’s still picking up the carnage afterward......it’s ‘maintenance’ driven it seems in order to not infringe on muslim rights rather than simply arrest all those they have under survellance and either jail them or get them out of the country.

If they were seen being arrested and often then they might just be ‘afraid’ to do another hit.....but currently the Brits are more afraid of the terrorists than they are of them.

[grey_whiskers]

Wait until 100-200 or more Muslim terrorists coordinate one big attack.

Won't happen unless the Muslims accidentally take out Davos or a Bilderberg conference.

Look what happened after frickin' 9-11.

All we got was a new UNION bureaucracy of incompetent Nazis called TSA -- resulting in bullsh*t like this:

[grey_whiskers]

Japan hasn’t caused any problems lately, have they?

[DoughtyOne]

No, but I’m not sure why you mentioned that in this context.

I didn’t have them in mind.

We used two nukes on them in 1945, 72 years ago. I didn’t consider that to be in a contemporary setting, and actions now I would.

Being in a World War setting where we are fighting for our very survival, might warrant such a strike, but we have a means to prevent our being overrun. We just aren’t doing it.

Who do we attack if some fruit loop carries on an act of terrorism on U.S. soil?

Do we blow up his original nation, one of the nations he came through, or the mosque he’s attended here for the last 20 years?

[grey_whiskers]

What the jihadists are doing, were called "atrocities" when done by Imperial Japan or Nazi Germany (they were atrocities done by Stalin, too, but his agents had infiltrated the press rooms, so he never got called on it).

Trying Bill "BlowJob" Clinton's "treat terrorism as a law enforcement problem" approach is failing so badly, it can no longer be treated as a mere mistake.

[DoughtyOne]

I believe that we have many of these people under surveillance.

We know who the potential troublemakers are.

We should pack them up and send them back to whatever hell hole they come out of.

We should find ways to encourage others to leave.

I don’t think we can force every one to leave, but I’d come up with as many good ways to encourage them to do so, as I could.

I have advocated paying them to leave. It would be well worth the cost to be rid of them.

I also believe we could employ RICO laws to find out what they are up to, and get rid of them.

Every tool we have, we should employ.

We should also keep tabs on their mosques and spiritual leaders.

Someone is directing these folks to take action.

It’s time we started booting those folks out, or putting them in prison.

There are lots of things we could do to reduce the problems we have.

We just don’t do it.

We need to demand they do it.

If we can find out what contacts they have overseas, if they commit an act, then go after that person. At the very least, see if they are a potential influence.

[DoughtyOne]

BTW: If I remember correctly, Clinton tried to treat the people at Guantanamo as “criminals”. They talked of moving them to the mainland had conducting trials in our courts.

We discussed this and agreed this could easily be used to game our system, revealing methods and operatives. We disagreed with that.

I’m not against picking up a guy who has a terrorist connection, and moving that person to Guantanamo. But I don’t want that person simply released like our past terrorist in chief.

I do want some sort of review process for someone being taken off our streets and taken to Guantanamo. There should be just cause, but I’d want ti done by a secure process.

I wouldn’t want a jihadi lawyer to be able to get information and pass it along.

These are difficult matters to handle.

[grey_whiskers]

The problem is, by treating it as "law enforcement" you get not only the games of "probable cause" and contaminated evidence, but you have them getting a free mass murder before we do anything.

At that rate of attrition, Western civ *dies*.

(Especially if most Muzzies do nothing but continue to out-breed us.)

Not to mention prancing autofellatory leftist judges declaring anything the President does "unconstitutional" so they can score with the other degenerate leftist perverts at their next tony cocktail party.

When it becomes military, guess what? Since they are irregulars, not in uniform, targeting civilians, you can snuff them on the spot.

[Churchillspirit]

Don’t bet more than you can afford to lose.

[DoughtyOne]

I just mentioned that we know who many of the problematic ones are. I said that I don’t mind them being picked up and shipped back to their former homeland.

While these numbers may not be massive, every one of them we send away, is one less threat.

That is not normal law enforcement. It is a review process for people who have come here and not lived up to the spirit of their declaration to enter. We can revoke their right to be here.

Any of them that come, even if they become a citizen, we can revoke their citizenship for cause. Get rid of them.

I’m not sure what you mean by, “When it becomes military...”

[grey_whiskers]

Bill Clinton changed the framing of terrorism from a national security issue to law enforcement.

In doing so, he gave terrorists *rights*.

Remember Andy McCarthy trying the blind shiek for the *first* (truck) bombing of the World Trade Center, where one of the terrorists got caught because he tried to claim for damages on the truck?

Go back to a national security footing.

Turn loose the military overseas without restrictions: we no longer need Middle Eastern oil.

Let the Euroweenies (who always hated us anyway) deal with their own self-imposed demographic tsunami.

And expel every last non-citizen Muslim from the US.

(Remember during World War II, where the Nazis infiltrated 8 saboteurs in civilian clothes on our shores? All but one were executed in short order...after a court martial.)

[DoughtyOne]

I don’t have a problem with all non-citizens being jettisoned.

It is a national security matter.

I have thought it was absurd to have all the Saudi Students here. Send them packing. We’re talking about 30,000 or so, last I heard.

Where the military can identify a problem, fine, let them take measures.

I do want our actions to be rational though. I don’t want to become them to beat them. I don’t think that is necessary.

Look, if a guy commits and act of terrorism, and we know this family helped, heaven help his family.

These families should be under surveillance. The actual potential terrorist should be under surveillance.

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

CNN, Caliphate Needs Nitwits