Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

At Least Three Anti-Trump Leakers Identified, Referred to Proper Authorities, to Be Fired Soon
Breitbart ^ | Matthew Boyle

Posted on 05/27/2017 3:17:43 PM PDT by blam

At least two separate news organizations are reporting that three distinct leakers have been identified at the White House and that President Donald Trump is expected to fire them when he returns from his first overseas trip. “CBS News has confirmed from two sources that three leakers of classified information at the White House have been identified and are expected to be fired,” CBS News reported this week, adding, “Officials within the Trump White House believe leaks of Mr. Trump’s conversation with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov are a ‘deliberate attempt’ by officials who are holdovers from President Obama’s administration and are trying to damage the Trump presidency.”

(snip)

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fired; leakers; reports; trump; whleaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: blam

Hope one is the Dana chick.


41 posted on 05/27/2017 4:38:36 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: musicman

Exactly, hang’em high ...


42 posted on 05/27/2017 4:47:22 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (FREEP U, Schmucky O'Putz!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: blam

“CBS News has confirmed from two sources that three leakers of classified information at the White House have been identified and are expected to be fired,”

CBS News reported this week, adding, “Officials within the Trump White House believe leaks of Mr. Trump’s conversation with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov are a ‘deliberate attempt’ by officials who are holdovers from President Obama’s administration...
****************************************************

So CBS (Case of B.S.) says this and that and everybody runs and says it’s true...were they there? Who told them, who were their sources, unidentified sources say a lot of things...’he said, she said’ so it must be true...

Not buying this B.S. either...again people are not reading the code words that make it ‘B.S. News’!!!


43 posted on 05/27/2017 4:48:51 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ( "The Force Awakens!!!"...Trump and Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KDF48

Exactly


44 posted on 05/27/2017 5:00:11 PM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

Poor move. The boss first learns the ropes, how the organization operates.

He hires replacements.

He hires and puts the chainsaw man in charge.


45 posted on 05/27/2017 5:48:12 PM PDT by TheNext (Just Build the Wall!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: txhurl
I re-bid that it will happen when AF1 reaches American waters.

So... who did he fire?

46 posted on 05/27/2017 7:10:18 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

Can’t tell yet, all his leakers were physically with him.


47 posted on 05/27/2017 7:38:59 PM PDT by txhurl (Time to blow the Queen and King off the board, DJT, and by your birthday, or on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: blam

There needs to be more than just “firing” for this...I’m amazed President Trump would even keep Obama holdovers around in areas of sensitivity like this. They should have been let go very early on in the process.

These leaks don’t just “damage the Trump presidency” - they damage the security of the nation and our allies. The press reported it as though Trump was responsible for the sensitivity of the information getting out and causing issues for our allies who share intelligence even though it wasn’t Trump who leaked the information, and he also decide to publish in it the specificity that the press chose to do in order to cause the damage to our national security. The leakers were responsible as well as the press for how specific they were in reporting it. It appears national security and safety are secondary as long as it can be used to damage Trump personally...but the damage done goes far beyond than that done to the President. And there is a lot more leaking going on than this. A full fledged criminal investigation should be impaneled to identify who is responsible and get them removed.


48 posted on 05/27/2017 7:40:47 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl
Can’t tell yet, all his leakers were physically with him.

There are 1,859 direct reports working in the Executive office of the president... they all went on that trip?

49 posted on 05/27/2017 8:00:18 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

sorry..but i blame alot of this on Trump himself...him and his people should have known better..he actually thought they were gonna give him a fair shake once he won. Especially the way he campaigned, i thought for sure he was gonna clean house. The first clue was the electoral voters getting threatened with violence...that was a first for me, what did the FBI do??....nada. Trump had to cancel a few campaign events due to organized violent protestors..how did that FBI investigation go?..This is all out war...Sessions is not the man to go to the mattresses with...


50 posted on 05/27/2017 8:12:12 PM PDT by basalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Surrounded_too
G I T M O

No! UNDER GITMO!

51 posted on 05/27/2017 9:00:27 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All

I can’t wait for the first three to be fired and prosecuted. For me it’s way overdue. Let’s start putting them all in jail.


52 posted on 05/28/2017 7:35:42 AM PDT by ssfromla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sheana

You are so right and that’s what bothers me about the holdovers and leakers. You and I arent billionaires or ceo’s yet we have enough sense to have fired them on day one. It’s quite disturbing.


53 posted on 05/28/2017 7:39:41 AM PDT by ssfromla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Charge them and yank their security clearances.

They will be economic anchors for the next employer.


54 posted on 05/28/2017 8:05:54 AM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
It would be reassuring to hear that the Secret Service had revised (and vetted) the SS staff detail covering current and former office holders.
55 posted on 05/28/2017 8:10:55 AM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ssfromla

Execute them for treason. Leak the video...


56 posted on 05/28/2017 12:07:18 PM PDT by jackal7163 (If you are not willing to achieve victory at any cost, you are doomed to defeat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson