Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Its not just CNN: Now ABC, CBS and NBC all refuse to run Trump re-election campaign ad ...
Daily Mail ^ | 5 May 2017 | David Martosko & Geoff Earle

Posted on 05/05/2017 12:25:53 PM PDT by shove_it

FULL HEADLINE: "It's not just CNN: Now ABC, CBS and NBC all refuse to run Trump re-election campaign ad that blasts them as 'FAKE NEWS'"

President Trump's 2020 reelection campaign is blasting 'biased' CNN, ABC, CBS and NBC for refusing to run Trump's first re-election ad The ad includes five TV news anchors and personalities as it blasts 'fake news' CNN pushed back at the 'false graphic' as says 'the mainstream media is not 'fake news' The campaign planned to put $1.5 million behind the 30-second ad Instead the publicity will drive millions of eyeballs to see it, free of charge Donald Trump's ongoing feud with TV networks not named 'Fox News' has clicked into a new gear as ABC, CBS and NBC have all joined CNN in refusing to run an ad from the president's re-election campaign committee. The ad shows hosts from all four networks under a banner that reads 'FAKE NEWS.' It's the Trump campaign's first commercial since winning the White House, and although it is three years out from the next election, it declares the nation has 'rarely seen such success.' The ad blasts the 'fake news' media for failing to see things that way – and includes CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Also included are MSNBC's Rachel Maddow and Andrea Mitchell, CBS's Scott Pelley and ABC's George Stephanopoulos in its rogues gallery.

SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO ...

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 4thestate5thcolumn; abc; ads; cbs; cnn; election2020; fakenews; first100days; liberalfascism; mediabias; nbc; spiked; trumpmedia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: smileyface

link to vid...
http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2017/05/01/8735835805667669120/640x360_MP4_8735835805667669120.mp4


42 posted on 05/05/2017 1:28:10 PM PDT by smileyface (Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

I’ve long thought that to Trump, paying for publicity is like paying for sex. Cheating!


43 posted on 05/05/2017 1:34:39 PM PDT by ichabod1 (I call Obama "osama" because he damaged us far more than Osama bin Ladin ever did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

The liberal media are whores. They’ll take money.


44 posted on 05/05/2017 1:35:05 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

I can’t recall the last time we watched anything at all on one of those networks.

Many millions of people would never have know Trump was running ads on their networks if they had just quietly run them.

Now by refusing the ads they give him more exposure than if they had run the ads,

By refusing the ads they make themselves less and less relevant.

And they become bigger irritants to the 63 million who voted for president Trump.

When the 2020 campaign really gets going will they run ads only for democrats and communists?


45 posted on 05/05/2017 1:40:23 PM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (Best Long Term Prepper Tactic: Beat The Muslim Takeover - Have Big Families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

..............was what I’m thinking...............if ever there was a case for a network abusing it’s license it is this one.

I look for Trump to call for pulling all 4 networks license.


46 posted on 05/05/2017 1:41:58 PM PDT by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Why the need for this ad? Trump was just elected. Isn’t this premature?

Trump just kicked the slats out from the democrats.

For a long time democrats have been expanding the campaign season.

Remember that Barack Obama officially announced his first candidacy in February 2007 - a full 21 months before the election.

And they usually start talking and hinting about a candidacy long before that.

So once again, Trump has beat them at their own game.

And I believe there are some rules that allow him to do certain things as an announced candidate that he cannot do otherwise.


47 posted on 05/05/2017 1:51:04 PM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (Best Long Term Prepper Tactic: Beat The Muslim Takeover - Have Big Families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

2020 reelection? Did I fall asleep? What year is it?


48 posted on 05/05/2017 1:52:54 PM PDT by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Then I guess they should be free’d from the handcuffs of press credentials entirely.

No invites to any thing the press is invited to.


49 posted on 05/05/2017 2:00:09 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Isn’t this premature?

A document from the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) indicates that Donald Trump took steps on the day when he was inaugurated to outmaneuver nonprofit organizations, leaving them unable to officially campaign against him over the next few years of his Presidency.

Trump Files Early With FEC For 2020 Candidacy, Outmaneuvers Nonprofits

50 posted on 05/05/2017 2:02:05 PM PDT by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be defeated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

trump needs to quit playing mr nice guys with these pricks and sic the FFC on these bastards; maybe threaten a few dozen broadcast licenses.


51 posted on 05/05/2017 2:17:16 PM PDT by catnipman ( Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

And of course this means the Democrats will win in 2020 right? Ha ha ha ha go away and take your very limited reach with you.


52 posted on 05/05/2017 2:19:33 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

Cable TV networks are not subject to FCC regulation as they do not have broadcast licenses. Broadcast licenses are only required if you broadcast using radio frequencies over the air.

Most of the Fake Newsers noted in the ad? Cable TV only.


53 posted on 05/05/2017 2:35:40 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

Clever...very clever.


54 posted on 05/05/2017 2:37:10 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Viral, yes. And perhaps land in front of a judge? Last I heard political speech is a particularly tricky category for any entity to so blatantly suppress. These outlets may have just stepped into a very expensive patch of legal mire. After all, if a baker must prepare a cake which contains statements anathema to his moral beliefs by what right does an FCC licensed broadcast utility refuse a political ad?


55 posted on 05/05/2017 2:37:15 PM PDT by katana (It still hasn't occurred to them that Trump doesn't give a s***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth; All

Thanks for adding/reminding us of this brilliant maneuver.


56 posted on 05/05/2017 2:44:12 PM PDT by shove_it (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen -- Dennis Prager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Once again, the self-righteous media declares what their interpretation is of free speech or what should be allowed on the airwaves. They have been so mind-numbingly biased and the polar opposite of impartial, but they still pull a stunt like this.


57 posted on 05/05/2017 2:47:02 PM PDT by No Dems 2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Run the Trump ads in local markets.


58 posted on 05/05/2017 4:02:56 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

Dang good move by Trump there.


59 posted on 05/05/2017 4:07:15 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: shove_it; GOPJ
GOPJ, sounds like Trump has done what we discussed re negative Congressits, this morning with the mediot talking heads using their own words and videos.

The elite mediots, who control BBC, ABCNNBCBS, Faux, the Ny/LA Slimes, WSJ, Compost, and LaRaza Slimes fail to realize: President Trump does not need them to speak to his 62+ million voters/us.

He Tweets us, sends his contributors emails and controls the White House digital system or he uses Youtube. He bypasses the left wing mediots, when he communicates directly with us.

So, neither President Trump, nor his 62+ million voters need nor do we want BBC, ABCNNBCBS, Faux, the Ny/LA Slime, WSJ, Compost, and LaRaza Times trying to tell us what our president is telling us. We know without their twisting and word games.

We don’t need the “old gotcha” press conferences. With the whining and lying liberal mediots attacking our president. We are tired of the mediots lying and telling us what to believe and how to vote! Ban them from the White House. Trump’s comments and statements are for his voters. We don’t need lying liberal mediots to tell us what he says to us. There is zero filtering, adjusting and lying to us when Trump talks to us directly!

Official Washington is being traumatized by the tweets of Donald Trump.

Trump speaking directly to the people via Twitter or the Whitehouse.com is causing a crisis among mediots, politicians, Never Trumpsters and lobbyists. They just don't know how to handle “Trump’s Twitter feed which traumatizes Washington and his enemies.

60 posted on 05/05/2017 4:08:07 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (100+ days without Hilliarly/Huma as POTUS! Thanks, President Trump for this great reality!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson