1 posted on
05/03/2017 3:41:14 AM PDT by
Strategy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Strategy
This should be an interesting round of hearings. This guy should be head of the BATFE!
To: Strategy
I wonder if he’s from Athens, TN.
3 posted on
05/03/2017 3:49:52 AM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
To: Strategy
M16? Yah,OK.Field artillery? Maybe not!
One of my favorite lines from Good Morning,Vietnam..."what's the difference between the Army and the Cub Scouts? The Cub Scouts don't have heavy artillery."
To: Strategy
an armed citizenry is the "ultimate checks and balances" against the federal government.
Mark Green gets it. Also, an armed citizenry is a deterrent to foreign invasion.
5 posted on
05/03/2017 3:57:46 AM PDT by
DocRock
(And now is the time to fight! Peter Muhlenberg)
To: Strategy
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
In the article, he mentions aircraft carriers. And he's right. They may be prohibitively expensive, but they're protected by the Second Amendment.
I'll settle for Ma Deuce ...
6 posted on
05/03/2017 4:00:58 AM PDT by
NorthMountain
(The Democrats ... have lost their grip on reality -DJT)
To: Strategy
Thank you! That is the point. You don’t want an armed government and an unarmed populace. The people are the boss, not the government.
7 posted on
05/03/2017 4:04:47 AM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: Strategy
sounds like he is cut from the same cloth as many of our Founding Fathers and certain to entertain the extreme animus of the “progressive” totalitarians in our queer government.
8 posted on
05/03/2017 4:05:33 AM PDT by
StonyBurk
(ring)
To: Strategy
“They should be able to possess whatever weapons the military has, because an armed citizenry is the “ultimate checks and balances” against the federal government”
I can hear the heads exploding from here. lol
9 posted on
05/03/2017 4:15:53 AM PDT by
V_TWIN
To: Strategy
...because an armed citizenry is the "ultimate checks and balances" against the federal government. Someone who understands the 2nd Amendment isn't just for hunters.
To: Strategy
Yes, yes yes.. ok I didn’t read the article because I’m shopping for artillery.
15 posted on
05/03/2017 4:38:03 AM PDT by
momincombatboots
(Gas attacks. Substitute Sadam for Assad and Iraq for Syria? How many American lives do you commit)
To: Strategy
He is exactly correct.
privately owned military carbines are the personal presidential veto of the citizen.
this guy is fantastic..!
17 posted on
05/03/2017 4:55:54 AM PDT by
gaijin
To: Strategy
Happiness is a warm mortar tube.
31 posted on
05/03/2017 5:55:42 AM PDT by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Strategy
I appreciate George Mason's definition of "militia":
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.
IMHO, about the only thing the Founding Fathers whiffed on was term limits, but I understand. They could not have contemplated the introduction of central air conditioning, which made Washington DC livable during the summer.
Texas has it right, i.e. the Legislature meets every two years, less opportunity for them to make mischief.
32 posted on
05/03/2017 5:57:40 AM PDT by
Night Hides Not
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Gonzales! Come and Take It!)
To: Strategy
“If the courts ever interpreted the Second Amendment the way they interpret the First Amendment, wed have a right to bear nuclear arms by now. - Ann Coulter
To: Strategy
Do you think I could get one of those MOABs then? There’s a particular stop-light camera near where I live that deserves some payback :)
34 posted on
05/03/2017 6:32:21 AM PDT by
The Numbers
(God, Family and Country is Right.)
To: Strategy
Anything short of nuclear, bio, or chem if they can write the check.
35 posted on
05/03/2017 6:40:00 AM PDT by
wally_bert
(I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
To: Strategy
They should be able to possess whatever weapons the military has, because an armed citizenry is the “ultimate checks and balances” against the federal government. ............................ Something the people of Venezuela failed to recognize.
38 posted on
05/03/2017 6:49:09 AM PDT by
Bringbackthedraft
(Again it disapeared? Damn cursor is in cahoots with the tag line.)
To: Strategy
Bringing sanity to the Pentagon one nominee at a time.
5.56mm
39 posted on
05/03/2017 6:58:07 AM PDT by
M Kehoe
To: Strategy
43 posted on
05/03/2017 7:22:31 AM PDT by
WKUHilltopper
(WKU 2016 Boca Raton Bowl Champions)
To: Strategy
Sounds presidential to me.
56 posted on
05/03/2017 9:34:06 AM PDT by
RinaseaofDs
(Truth, in a time of universal deceit, is courage)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson