So what is the administration planning to do about this?
What they SHOULD do, is to drop the legal equivalent of a MOAB on these activist judges. The problem is that the White House response is being crafted by idiots from the same tribe (=lawyers) that caused the problem.
And this now is the point.
Trump has been been stymied three times on immigration policy by the 9th circuit.
And he has not lifted a finger against them. He has surrendered each time - making wonderful statements that merely point out that HE APPEARS POWERLESS to actually do anything about their usurpation. Does he believe that he will be in office long enough for them to all die off so he can appoint their successors?
Mr. President, it is what you DO when your deadly opponent thwarts you that is important. Your words here mean nothing. They will oppose you to the death. Will you fight back as hard?
It better be dramatic and it better be soon. Every one of these decisions that has stopped President Trump's decisions to protect the US from foreign threats has been outrageous. This one is particularly bizarre....a San Francisco judge decides San Francisco cannot be penalized for breaking federal law.
That's a real good letter, but only if it's the preamble to action stopping rogue judges TODAY!!
Read the statement. They will pursue all legal ways....i.e. an appeal
First the Ninth Circuit rules against the ban & now it hits again on sanctuary cities-both ridiculous rulings. See you in the Supreme Court!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 26, 2017
Gosh darn it, they forgot to cc: me on the internal White House memo!
I believe they wrote that they will ignore the ruling until SCOTUS has it’s say.
WE should demand repeal of the 17th Amendment and be done with anti-9th and 10th Amendment judges.