Posted on 04/07/2017 4:59:43 AM PDT by detective
Shortened title.
Full title: Syria's government was supposed to have gotten rid of its chemical weapons in 2014. So what happened?
There’s a mystery at the heart of an apparent chemical weapons attack in Syria this week: Syria’s government, suspected of carrying out the attack, was supposed to have gotten rid of all its chemical weapons in 2014.
A year earlier, President Obama said Syria had crossed a “red line” by allegedly using sarin gas near Damascus and Aleppo, killing at least 100 to 150 people. But rather than take military action, Obama agreed to a Russian deal to dismantle Syria’s chemical weapons program.
Syria’s foreign minister has denied that the country’s forces use chemical weapons in its battle with opposition rebels and Islamic State militants, both of whom seek the overthrow of President Bashar Assad. But the effectiveness of the Obama deal is now under new examination.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
Where did these chemical weapons come from?
Were chemical weapons given to ISIS and other "rebels" the Obama administration was arming and funding?
Where did these chemical weapons come from?
That is easy. Syria either lied and kept them, or made more.
What did Assad stand to gain from using chemical weapons here in contrast to what would be certain to be an international outrage?
Assad thought Trump was a sissy like Obama. Assad was wrong.
What Happened? 0bama was in charge.
Read this for another view. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-06/evidence-calls-western-narrative-about-syrian-chemical-incident-question
People are forgetting that before the rebelt inVader with Obama’s help, The people—including Christians, lived in peace in Syria. Syrian Christians begged us to leave Bashar alone. He kept terrorists in check and left then in peace. Obama wanted instability in all of the Middle East.
That is easy. Syria either lied and kept them, or made more.
It wasn't the Syrian government. The SAA and Russia were making huge gains against the Islamist rebels and then their is a staged (Chlorine?) attack in broad daylight with all the children (w/o their mothers) pictured.
Or Hillary Clinton’s favorite rebels had them. Why did you leave that out of possibilities?
Don't care.
Who, or what group really perpetrated the attack?
Who had something to gain from the attack and who had something to lose?
‘False Flag’ — Ron Paul Says Syrian Chemical Attack ‘Makes No Sense’
Ron Paul claimed on Wednesday’s broadcast of “The Liberty Report” that all signs point toward Tuesday’s chemical attack in Syria being a false flag operation.
“Before this episode of possible gas exposure and who did what, things were going along reasonably well for the conditions,” the former Texas congressman stated. “Trump said let the Syrians decide who should run their country, and peace talks were making out, and Al Qaeda and ISIS were on the run.”
“It looks like, maybe, somebody didn’t like that so there had to be an episode, and the blame now is we can’t let that happen because it looks like it might benefit Assad.”
“It makes no sense, even if you were totally separate from this and take no sides of this and you were just an analyst, it doesn’t make sense for Assad under these conditions to all of the sudden use poison gasses,” Paul continued. “I think it’s zero chance that he would have done this deliberately.”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/false-flag-ron-paul-says-syrian-chemical-attack-makes-no-sense/5583844
This should be a ‘must read’.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clean_Break:_A_New_Strategy_for_Securing_the_Realm
He’s been using chlorine bombs for quite a while now with very little foreign outrage, so why not?
Not that it matters...they weren’t building that reactor at al Kibar with North Korean help because they just wanted electricity.
Ron has common sense — not so common these days.
Ron Paul is the voice of reason here
>>>Who, or what group really perpetrated the attack? Who had something to gain from the attack and who had something to lose?
This was a Trump operation from the start. He had the CIA plant the gas so that he could have a show of strength while dining with the Chinese Premier. The target was not Assad, but Xi. Hey, it is as plausible as all the other deep state conspiracies being thrown around.
He kept terrorists in check?
really?
Both Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad openly run offices in Damscus.
When wanted terrorist Imad Mugniyeh, the militant leader of the terror group Hezbollah and the guy responsible for blowing up a couple hundred US Marines, torturing the CIA chief Buckley and a US Colonel to death, the brutal killing of Navy diver Robert Stetham on board a hijacked airliner, and more recently involved in terror attacks in our hemisphere - was finally killed in 2008 in a car bomb, it was in Syria, shortly after one of his numerous meetings with Syrian officials.
Since when are terrorists “kept in check” by treating them as contractors?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
