Posted on 04/03/2017 1:39:50 PM PDT by Helicondelta
Nunes is in the House, not the Senate.
L
And the moral authority? There are only two outcomes with using the national security apparatus to spy on political opponents: a surveillance state or the people through their reps pull the plug. We have more invasive technology than ever and that trend will never stop. The time window to take back control is not very long.
There was no moral authority.
That is plainly obvious.
Rep. Rooney: Who, normally, in the NSA, would make the decision to unmask?
Rogers: There are 20 individuals, including myself, who I have delegated this authority to approve unmask requests.
Rep. Rooney: And, does the level of approval change depending upon the reason for unmasking if it was something or somebody, say, really important, would that matter?
Rep. Rogers: Its not, necessary designated in writing that way, by certainly by custom and tradition, at times, requests will be pushed up. Im the senior-most of the 20 individuals, requests will be pushed to my level, saying, Hey, sir, we just want to make sure youre comfortable with this.
I thought those kinds of hats were considered a mark of honor by individuals of your persuasion.
They do NOT have to prove intent or motive or whether it was a racially motivated attack, the only thing they have to prove is that Susan Rice released US citizens names from surveillance.
That is a felony, PERIOD.
Felony means jail time unless, of course, she can plead a deal.
Possibilities? Valery called and
Another possibility: Hussein and I were talking and.....
Unmasking was not illegal even if she did it?
Then why did Rice deny it on national Television stating, ‘I Know Nothing’ regarding the unmasking?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfRUItnjf3A
They KNOW DAMN WELL WHERE THIS IS GOING: LEAVENWORTH.........OR SOMEPLACE SIMILAR............
Thomson prison expected to be fully operational in 2017
http://www.sj-r.com/news/20161005/thomson-prison-expected-to-be-fully-operational-in-2017
Boy that Susan Rice, no scandals there huh Obama...
Wow!
Dafuq is wrong with you.
Maybe you need a new website.
Trump has played the leaks scandal so superbly.
For all you shouting to “lock her up” as soon as he was inaugurated, you need to realise that Clinton ( and Obama ) are pawns in a far, far greater game. He shoots too fast and the deep state wins.
Trump knows he will get one shot, and one shot only to take down the deep state and the globalist elite that runs it. He has shown tremendous resolve, patience and guile waiting for the bastards to overreach themselves.
Have you seen the FISA court approved rules concerning unmasking?
Some here are claiming unmasking is not illegal. Yet Rice herself denied it on national television stating, I Know Nothing, regarding the unmasking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfRUItnjf3A
We need to know what those protocols are.
That might be true regarding news rules. But that’s not was I was talking about.
I was referring to the fact others here have stated if Rice did the unmasking, it’s no biggy and not illegal. If that’s the case, then why would Rice herself completely deny it stating, I Know Nothing, regarding the unmasking?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfRUItnjf3A
Susan Rice is a professional liar, an agent of the seditious deepstate shadowgovernment.
Schiff has been quite. I haven’t thought of that. Guess BO not coming back anytime soon. He’s probably having a breakdown.
I think it indicates they're going after the whole bunch! This will be YUGE!
Why do these people want to become criminals by doing Obama and Clintons dirty work. All their inner circles now seem to be criminals. Someone will rat out Obama eventually and Clinton-maybe.
Not me. That’s why Barry is in Tahiti, with a jet standing by to fly him to a non-extradition country.
It would be ironic if he fled to Russia, like Snowden.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.