Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Schumer will bring the filibuster threat right up to the edge, perhaps even start one, then suggest a “deal” with the turtle.

The deal will be, we (dems) won’t filibuster if you agree not to use the nuke option on the next justice.

Will the turtle stupidly go for it?


2 posted on 04/02/2017 7:46:40 PM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables (Drone Soros and sons!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Basket_of_Deplorables

How about something really simple. Something along the lines of Schuck You Fumer. Elections have consequences.


5 posted on 04/02/2017 7:49:16 PM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools. Go Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Basket_of_Deplorables

Oh, RIGHT, Schumer! I’m sure everyone would be on the same page on that. /s


6 posted on 04/02/2017 7:49:20 PM PDT by MNGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Basket_of_Deplorables

Yet another ludicrous attack on the GOP leadership. The days of surrender are over.


15 posted on 04/02/2017 7:53:27 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Basket_of_Deplorables

The “next one” is what has the Ds hopelessly worried. They fear that dear Ruth may move on to her eternal reward and be replaced by a Trump nominee. I’d love it, especially since Ruth very inappropriately spoke out against our president.


20 posted on 04/02/2017 7:55:20 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Basket_of_Deplorables

If you are good we might let you help chose the next one.


23 posted on 04/02/2017 7:57:45 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Basket_of_Deplorables

“The deal” will be on Ginsbergs replacement and Trump will go with it.


26 posted on 04/02/2017 7:59:59 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Basket_of_Deplorables

He could always promise not to nuke it, but then remove the two-track rule for the next nominee, so that Schmucky would have to stand in the well of the Senate rapping to the beat to stop Trump’s next nominee. Will Americans stand for such a thing? Who knows?


48 posted on 04/02/2017 8:38:38 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (April 2006 Message from Dan: http://www.dansimmons.com/news/message/2006_04.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Basket_of_Deplorables
Hey Schmuckster! Do you remember how proud you were of Obama when he said, “We won, you lost!”?

Well Schmuckster, we won, you lost, get over it.

59 posted on 04/02/2017 11:11:41 PM PDT by Chgogal (I will NOT submit, therefore, Jihadists hate me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Basket_of_Deplorables
If you're even talking a deal, I'd say that Schumer is going to get wounded....by 8 Dems...at least.

Remember, Schumer and 10 other SITTING Dems confirmed Gorsuch a few years back.

Tidbit...Scalia was confirmed 98-0.

72 posted on 04/03/2017 7:17:37 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson