Posted on 03/05/2017 4:19:17 AM PST by HomerBohn
Might be? LOL. I suppose that depends on how one defines "sedition," but Google is leftist, anti-American to the core.
Enemies domestic ALERT! DEPOPULATING them from politics may not be enough.
Some criminals never stop unless incarcerated or eliminated.
CW2.0
Articles that purport to unravel complexity and reveal the truth lose ALL credibility, IMO, when they make such mistakes. The bane of Internet "reporting" is poorly trained writers and no editors asking tough questions.
From CNN, Jan 5, 2017:
Methinks the party of Jefferson morphed into the party of Marx.
5.56mm
Don’t confuse Guccifer with Guccifer 2.0.
Guccifer 2.0 looks to be WARREN FLOOD.
Sit through first couple of minutes of this to get to good info.
Excellent info.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5oAP6aumHg
Hmmmmm...
got it. thanks
CrowdStrike stands fully by its analysis and findings identifying two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries present in the DNC network in May 2016. On June 15, 2016, a blog post to a WordPress site authored by an individual using the moniker Guccifer 2.0 claimed credit for breaching the Democratic National Committee.
Um, okay. Who is the second adversary? And what is his link to the DNC?
The Russians had nothing to do with it, NOTHING! This was all made up by the Obama administration and I wouldn’t be surprised if there are some Republicans involved in this. And you know who I mean.
There is no legimate reason to disallow FBI inspection of a server breach that implicates national security,,, unless no national security or criminal crumbs are available.
Yes, very confusing. The article says Guccifer is not connected to the Russians. But the first sentence you cited says “two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries present in the DNC network” — the author didn’t identify EITHER of the “adversaries,” did he/she?
If Guccifer is really a Romanian, I HIGHLY doubt he’s working for the Russians. Romanians don’t like the Russians very much.
I saw that too and disregarded the whole story...
Lots of amateurs out there. Not only in the MSM.
"THIS WE KNOW AS FACT: The Pittsburgh FBI field office (Cyber-security Unit) is investigating to identify those behind breaches of the DNC's computer systems. The trail leads to a family of Muslim IT staffers who worked exclusively for Democrats on Capitol Hill."
Especially the second sentence is far beyond what I thought was known, but if it is true then it would be fantastic.
I found the video a little confusing (may have to look at her written statements) but it would be very intersting if the “Russian intelligence operation” aka Guccifer 2.0 actually turned out to be one of the owners of one of the cybersecurity companies. At least something needs to be explained!
OK, we don’t have to be that conspiratorial, but it just shows the need for these investigations to be carried out by official agencies according to generally approved forensic methods.
Several private companies involved. Have all had access to the DNC server? How have they secured the initial state of the server? Lots and lots of questions, but I believe that the DNC was very happy to leave many of those issues unanswered.
Better start reading up——the IT story has been all over FR.
http://freerepublic.com/tag/itgate/index
Agree. Even FOX News anchor on one show this morning said the Russians “hacked” the election.
The left has successfully ingrained that in the narrative.
It’s ridiculous. And frustrating
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.