[exDemMom]

That isn't the only sloppy part of the article. There is also this:

CrowdStrike stands fully by its analysis and findings identifying two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries present in the DNC network in May 2016. On June 15, 2016, a blog post to a WordPress site authored by an individual using the moniker Guccifer 2.0 claimed credit for breaching the Democratic National Committee.

Um, okay. Who is the second adversary? And what is his link to the DNC?

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Yes, very confusing. The article says Guccifer is not connected to the Russians. But the first sentence you cited says “two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries present in the DNC network” — the author didn’t identify EITHER of the “adversaries,” did he/she?