Posted on 03/04/2017 8:18:10 PM PST by hotsteppa
Obama caught lying AGAIN. White House sources inside the Obama administration acknowledge that wiretapping was conducted to spy on Trump during the 2016 Presidential election.
Kathy (Journalist): My sources from the White House told me, she thinks its all true. She said, um there were concerns that Trump-and this is from the White House and the administration inside the White House
there were concerns that Trump and his surrogates may have been colluding with the Russians and a possible bargaining chip to influence the election, therefore a wiretap was conducted.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Citizen 4...
“Does Obama still have an Administration?”
Easy answer: yes.
And he means to keep it at all costs, up to and including overthrowing ours.
I love it when the press challenges Trump.
They never learn
Always remember, politicians parse words. So let’s examine every specific word in the Obama statement:
“A cardinal rule of the Obama administration was that no White House official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the Department of Justice,” Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said in a statement Saturday. “As part of that practice, neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false.””
My grammer school teacher would ask, “What is the subject, and what is the predicate? Saying that Obama did not “order” the surveillance does not deny that it happened, or even that he was unaware of it.
All these details will become known.
good work
So far, no evidence exists that the Trump campaign colluded with Russian hackers to steal the election.
So far, no evidence exists that the Obama administration wiretapped Trump Tower for now.
The media treats the first as a fact and the second as an outrageous and slanderous claim. But there is no bias in their reporting. Absolutely none.
See it works both ways but my bet is on Trump to have more of the goods.
Trump did more damage to Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi in two simple Twitter messages yesterday than they’ve ever faced in their decades in politics.
Sources will come out. Trump didn’t act on this without a paper trail. Oh and Obama saying he has never wiretapped an American citizen... What about this guy born in Oregon killed in a drone strike?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Yahiye_Gadahn
Following editorialized headline at CNN.com
“Trump’s baseless wiretap claim”
Excellent observations! Well done!!
None of this became important until after election since
Hillary was suppose to win by a landslide and carry most of this country’s 57 states.
Trump has evidence...Trump would not have came out with it if he didn’t...he will not go further until he’s ready...Trump is just giving the Obama people time to dig themselves a deeper hole...
Trump’s timing is impeccable....
Bent?
He put those “Rules” on the tip of his trigger finger and whirled them. Then he fired.
Bend? You jest.
Also makes the meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch even MORE interesting..remember everyone thought that the meeting had to do with making sure Clinton didn’t get charged..well maybe it also had to do with this whole Russian BS..this was set in motion a long time ago..as an extra insurance policy in case Clinton lost the election
He seems to get his ducks in a row, then Tweet.
Everyone laughs at him and several days later they have egg all over their faces.
This shot across Obama’s bow is putting him on notice. “You want to play hardball sonny? We can if you like.”
Trump will destroy this guy.
Another Freeper made a very astute point earlier today:
Ex-presidents rarely ever hang around in Washington after they leave office. If they do, it's not to stay connected to the political scene. They only hang around Washington if they know they have to do damage control over devastating revelations about their administration.
Ah, I have to tell ya, there was supposed to be another sentence on #5, but instead I prematurely posted it. I was distracted. It was to read: Does Obama still have an administration? If not, why are all these people speaking for him?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.