Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Is Exploring Use Of Military Force Against North Korea
Zero Hedge - WSJ ^ | 3-1-2017 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 03/01/2017 3:52:58 PM PST by blam

An internal White House strategy review on North Korean options includes the possibility of both military force and regime change to counter the country’s nuclear-weapons threat, the WSJ reports, a prospect that has some U.S. allies in the region on edge. The review comes amid recent events have strained regional stability including last month's launch by North Korea of a ballistic missile into the Sea of Japan, and the assassination of the estranged half brother of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Malaysia.

The WSJ adds that U.S. officials have underscored the possible military dimensions of their emerging strategy in recent discussions with allies, suggesting that the planning is at an advanced stage.

President Trump has taken steps to reassure allies that he won’t abandon agreements that have underpinned decades of U.S. policy on Asia, his pledge that Pyongyang would be stopped from ever testing an intercontinental ballistic missile—coupled with the two-week-old strategy review—has some leaders bracing for a shift in American policy. During Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s two-day summit in February with Mr. Trump, U.S. officials on several occasions stated that all options were under consideration to deal with North Korea, according to a person familiar with the discussions.

It was clear to the Japanese side that those options encompassed a U.S. military strike on North Korea, possibly if Pyongyang appeared ready to test an ICBM. The Japanese side found that scenario “worrisome,” he said.

The proposal emerged roughly two weeks ago, when Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland convened a meeting with national-security officials across the government and asked them for proposals on North Korea, including ideas that one official described as well outside the mainstream.

The request was for all options, ranging from U.S. recognition of North Korea as a nuclear state to military

(snip)

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; msm; norks; northkorea; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: blam

This will be a war that will never happen.

The fat pig will die and China will annex the Norks.


21 posted on 03/01/2017 4:23:49 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

I suspect we have been exploring military options and regime change in North Korea since the ceasefire in 1953.


22 posted on 03/01/2017 4:30:20 PM PST by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

Having done my time in, I’m sure the military has military options for every country/region on earth and updated as necessary. Seems to me to be another story to show Pres Trump as a warmonger, when all he’s getting done is updating existing plans already on the books. If there is not a plan, he would be derelict in his duty as President to not get one done. Can’t imagine how these so called journalist can even walk over to file their story with their panties so bunched and knotted up over a non story.


23 posted on 03/01/2017 4:35:17 PM PST by mikefive (RLTW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleven Bravo 6 319thID

That’s my personal opinion. Anything that turns up on the launch pad gets knocked right off the launch pad.


24 posted on 03/01/2017 4:37:00 PM PST by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam

We should have nuked this bastard’s grandpa back in 1950, before the Chinese and Russians had nukes. Like all problems they just turn into bigger headaches if you don’t deal with them early.

Personally I would not hesitate to nuke this guy and send a message to other despots. The Chinese are not going to start a nuke war to protect this d-bag.

The last thing we should do is take some sort of limited action, which will just piss him off and invite a counter-strike. Either take him out properly or don’t do it at all.


25 posted on 03/01/2017 4:47:41 PM PST by KingofZion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Bingo. They are called contingency plans. Probably have one for the invasion of Newfoundland in case they ever get out of line.


26 posted on 03/01/2017 4:50:36 PM PST by Michael.SF. (Women who are 25 pounds overweight tend to live longer than the men who mention it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

There are DoD contingency plans for everything. There’s probabaly a contingency plan on the shelf for invading Antarctica.


27 posted on 03/01/2017 4:50:45 PM PST by TADSLOS (Reset Underway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingofZion

What you said.


28 posted on 03/01/2017 5:01:14 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: blam

The United Nations (UN) has been at war with North Korea and Communist China since 1950. No peace treaty has been signed. Only a ceasefire has been agreed to.


29 posted on 03/01/2017 5:01:25 PM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

Bad does not begin the describe how wrong this would be.


30 posted on 03/01/2017 5:05:20 PM PST by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
We “explore plans” to attack all potential enemies. It would be negligent not to do so.

Exactly!

31 posted on 03/01/2017 5:06:05 PM PST by libertylover (In 2016 small-town America got tired of being governed by people who don't know a boy from a girl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazminerose

One big problem. The Norks have 30,000 rockets aimed at Seoul South Korea. Less than 40 miles away.


32 posted on 03/01/2017 5:14:50 PM PST by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All

Well, since everyone is leaking classified stuff, somebody should leak the North Korean target list, I am sure that would keep Fat Boy in line.


33 posted on 03/01/2017 5:23:04 PM PST by Peter ODonnell (Listen for my radio call-in program on channel A in your brain, yes caller ... I'm listening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: blam

Let me say that you need “contingency” plans for every scenario. Contingency plans are just that. That does not mean they will ever be used.


34 posted on 03/01/2017 5:27:11 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Sooner or later, North Korea is going to implode.

The only question anybody need ask is whether or not they’ll launch when that happens.


35 posted on 03/01/2017 5:37:52 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever
ANOTHER leak. MCCAIN? LINDSEY?

Maybe, maybe not. This is the kind of thing that works better than Viagra for the likes of McInsane and Gramnisty.

Can't see that they'd be opposed to the idea.

36 posted on 03/01/2017 5:37:53 PM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord ((I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Peter ODonnell
"Well, since everyone is leaking classified stuff, somebody should leak the North Korean target list, I am sure that would keep Fat Boy in line."

Fat Man Bomb

37 posted on 03/01/2017 5:40:36 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: lurk

This is just talk....

Unverified to boot.

The Chinks are going to have to deal with the NorKs, they created and enabled it.


38 posted on 03/01/2017 5:41:46 PM PST by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

Sounds like another “leaked” memo from the White House to screw up the “media’s” heads.


39 posted on 03/01/2017 6:14:19 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it. - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Tongil!


40 posted on 03/01/2017 6:54:40 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson