Posted on 02/21/2017 5:22:42 AM PST by elhombrelibre
All is not well at Breitbart News.
A senior editor at the right-wing publication tells Washingtonian that at least a half-dozen employees are prepared to leave the company if Milo Yiannopoulos is not promptly fired. A second Breitbart source confirms this estimate.
Yiannopoulos, himself a senior editor at Breitbart, was booted from his speaking slot at this weeks Conservative Political Action Convention (CPAC), following taped revelations in which he appears to endorse pedophilia.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonian.com ...
I have a VERY big problem with adult men raping 13 year old boys and I'm amazed that anyone of this forum would not be!
LOL!
I voted Trump you clown.
You seem to enjoy worshipping pedophiles and perching them up - nice “Conservative” values there.
Not surprised you trolls are as numerous as you are though.
Just went over to Breitbart and Milo was nowhere to be found on the home page. Not a pink headline in sight!
And from what I just read in post 13 it appears Milo does too.
I’ve seen the audio referred to in articles by Gateway Pundit, Mdeiaite, The Daily Mail, Town Hall and Denis Michael Lynch but none of the articles have a link to the original source content. I’m beginning to wonder why.
The circular firing squads are one of the reasons that I seldom post anymore.
“Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13 years old, who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty. Pedophilia is attraction to people who dont have functioning sex organs yet who have not gone through puberty.”
I believe this is a correct statement. There must be more that caused the kerfuffle. From this, it does not sound like he is being an advocate for underage sex.
I see Conservatives are still shooting one another.
_______________
You get it. Thanks!
There is someone out here in the wilderness.
I refuse to Alinsky him. I will not be manipulated by the left, particularly by an un-sourced story at a fake news site.
I actually agree with Milo’s statement, technically speaking.
It is pedophilia when the attraction is to pre-pubescent people. That violates our society’s “norms”, which are just a cultural thing. I’ve felt for a long time that criminals should be tried as adults once they reach the age of around 12.
The Christian Bible is silent (to the best of my knowledge) on when one becomes a “woman” or “man”. I believe Jewish law does draw a line at something around 12, but I could be wrong.
If the statement you quoted is what all the fuss is about, regarding Milo, I retract my condemnation of him.
And to be really clear, I’m talking “technically”. Personally, I was divorced at 43 and when I tried to date a 27 year old I felt like I was dating a kid. I ended up marrying the woman of my dreams 19 years ago. She’s six days younger than me.
In my previous post I said, “It is pedophilia when the attraction is to pre-pubescent people. That violates our societys norms, which are just a cultural thing.”
What I actually MEANT was, “It is pedophilia when the attraction is to pre-pubescent people. Being attracted to post pubescent people between that age and, say 16-18 year olds violates our societys norms, which are just a cultural thing.”
The site cited in this post is fake because it is a conveyance of one targeted story. It is not a news site, it is a manipulation of the internet.
There are no links.
You have a great day and hang in there! :-)
I have been entertained by some his handling of fascist and moslem protesters at his speeches, but he is a little too far forward on his faggotry.
We all know he’s gay, got it. But he gets flat disgusting and shouldn’t be at the forefront of things.
Do you conflate support for Trump as support for Milo, as is they’re the same?
Are you speaking from personal knowledge? If not, how can you make a blanket statement about something you know nothing about?
I think his act has caught up with him. Expect him to show up as a contrite liberal any day now, dismayed at how the Right treated him.
Milo is a pervert but at he is our pervert so its ok. That seems to be the current line of thinking here.
Who shot Milo? I think the honest answer is Milo shot himself. But why not blame those conservatives who think Milo’s act isn’t conservative. Yeah, I get it that many like him because he exposes and upsets the Left, but we stand for more than that.
Because it is much harder to take it out of context and twist it if the unedited original is also presented.
Oh wait, you were asking rhetorically.
You have a great day. I'm outta here. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.