Posted on 02/09/2017 5:06:18 PM PST by Synthesist
Edited on 02/09/2017 5:09:37 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
DETROIT (AP)
(Excerpt) Read more at bigstory.ap.org ...
“Impossible!” ... “Insignificant” .. “All Too rare and had no effect?”
SMGFan wrote: “Impossible!” ... “Insignificant” .. “All Too rare and had no effect?”
Yep, no doubt that all of those will probably be in the liberal list of stupid excuses...
Here is thread from Feb 5 :
Vice President Mike Pence to Head Voter Fraud Investigation
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3521701/posts
[I suspect Roger Stone is involved - - -
I think Trump’s win was massive, and that’s why the dems are upset. They expected key wins to take the states, but Trump’s turn out was massive.
Again, it tells me the man is heaven sent.
Let me guess, I bet this is why Bill was not crazy about doing the recounts because he would know that this would be discovered. At this stage in time, I’d dare say Nevada and Minnesota would be at least two blue states that Donald probably won if you were to fully investigate the fraud and then do a recount without it.
Did she know the 'difference' between ONCE and TWICE?
or THREE times or more?
>Who says voter fraud does not exist?
Unfortunately, NEITHER party wishes to rock the boat here. They may have to actually come out and DO something that would bite ‘em in the @ss; as w/ ‘campaign finance reform’.
Tiny tip of a massive iceberg.
Amen! Come to think of it, I don't think the media ever disclosed the party affiliation the Melowese Richardson, the Cincinnati multi-voter, embraced, although she did vote for, and defended her votes for, Obama numerous times.
This article is a fraud.
It’s meant to downplay the problem. Nobody is going to get worked up if an entire state like michigan had just 30 bad apples. Truth is, the bad apples measure in the thousands? Tens of thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lord only knows...but it’s clear by the electoral map, that the ONLY place we see strange and massive election anomalies is in all these big cities... You don’t see these patterns in small towns at all. Institutionalized voter fraud is probably worse than even any of us can imagine.
Those are the excuses the most educated people I know use.
I didn’t say smartest. Most educated. They’ve been conditioned by universities to believe it.
How many elections have been won by a handful of votes? How many have been stolen by “late returns” and “recount” efforts?
I agree that the point of the article is to minimize the problem. But we’ve been told for so long that it never happens or extremely rare that, to me, 31 voters in one state caught in an easy sweep tells me the problem is serious.
As hard as it is to conceive, there are millions of "bad apples" in places like California and New York. And yes, even those places the problem is far worse in the large cities than in surrounding rural areas. But in places like California the fraud is institutionalized to the point that when it is eventually exposed... the authorities will switch their argument to insist that it is morally imperative to allow anyone residing in the country to vote and that only repeat voters and those voting on behalf of fictional and dead, people should be pursued and prosecuted.
One person can affect many votes....and I wouldn’t be surprised if the GOP had some things going on also. ...but then this was about who wanted it most...and we did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.