This article is a fraud.
It’s meant to downplay the problem. Nobody is going to get worked up if an entire state like michigan had just 30 bad apples. Truth is, the bad apples measure in the thousands? Tens of thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lord only knows...but it’s clear by the electoral map, that the ONLY place we see strange and massive election anomalies is in all these big cities... You don’t see these patterns in small towns at all. Institutionalized voter fraud is probably worse than even any of us can imagine.
How many elections have been won by a handful of votes? How many have been stolen by “late returns” and “recount” efforts?
I agree that the point of the article is to minimize the problem. But we’ve been told for so long that it never happens or extremely rare that, to me, 31 voters in one state caught in an easy sweep tells me the problem is serious.
As hard as it is to conceive, there are millions of "bad apples" in places like California and New York. And yes, even those places the problem is far worse in the large cities than in surrounding rural areas. But in places like California the fraud is institutionalized to the point that when it is eventually exposed... the authorities will switch their argument to insist that it is morally imperative to allow anyone residing in the country to vote and that only repeat voters and those voting on behalf of fictional and dead, people should be pursued and prosecuted.