Posted on 02/09/2017 2:17:04 PM PST by sheikdetailfeather
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals announced they will issue a ruling on President Trump’s temporary travel ban.
Washington Judge James L. Robart filed a temporary restraining order on President Trump’s refugee ban from seven terror states.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
I say in response, go Nuc the cloture rule, put the Judge on the Court tomorrow without any hearings.
Drudge has his siren going right now!!
APPEALS COURT KEEPS DOORS OPEN
RULES AGAINST TRUMP
http://www.drudgereport.com/
Ping for later reading.
unfortunately the word SHALL means it is MANDATORY and NOT an option, even if CONgress said they could, unless they amend the Constitution, the Judges of these Inferior Courts should be PROSECUTED!
Remember what Jefferson said - that the Constitution “is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please.” It was Jefferson’s belief that a court cannont issue mandamaus to the president or the legislature. Lifetime appointments to the bench were intended to insulate judges from politics - it’s long past time to reconsider that logic
The proper venue is only USSC.
More than unacceptable, it’s dangerous.
You nailed it.
Hell, keep issue slightly different executive orders until they get blue in face running into court. No one can stop him from being the Chief Executive Officer.
Did they write an opinion?
See link to decision at post #133.
See link at posting #133.
Republicans push bill to split up ‘nutty 9th Circuit’
Fox News ^ | 02/09/17 | Barnini Chakraborty
Posted on 2/9/2017, 3:20:37 PM by Hadean
As judges on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals weigh the legality of President Trump’s immigration executive order, a Republican push to split up the controversial court — and shrink its clout — is gaining steam on Capitol Hill.
Republican Sens. Jeff Flake and John McCain of Arizona introduced legislation last month to carve six states out of the San Francisco-based court circuit and create a brand new 12th Circuit.
They argue that the 9th is too big, too liberal and too slow resolving cases. If they succeed, only California, Oregon, Hawaii and two island districts would remain in the 9th’s judicial fiefdom.
Right now, Flake said, the circuit is far too sprawling. “It represents 20 percent of the population — and 40 percent of the land mass is in that jurisdiction. It’s just too big,” Flake told Fox News on Wednesday. “We have a bedrock principle of swift justice and if you live in Arizona or anywhere in the 9th Circuit, you just don’t have it.”
Flake says it typically takes the court 15 months to hand down a decision. “It’s far too long,” he added.
Conservatives have mocked the 9th Circuit for years, often calling it the “Nutty 9th” or the “9th Circus,” in part because so many of its rulings have been overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Under Flake’s bill, the new circuit would cover Nevada, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Arizona and Alaska, leaving the 9th with three Pacific states as well as the Northern Mariana Islands and Guam.
A separate House version introduced by Rep. Andy Biggs and four other Arizona Republicans would leave Washington state in the 9th Circuit.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3523202/posts
Republicans push bill to split up ‘nutty 9th Circuit’
Fox News ^ | 02/09/17 | Barnini Chakraborty
Posted on 2/9/2017, 3:20:37 PM by Hadean
As judges on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals weigh the legality of President Trump’s immigration executive order, a Republican push to split up the controversial court — and shrink its clout — is gaining steam on Capitol Hill.
Republican Sens. Jeff Flake and John McCain of Arizona introduced legislation last month to carve six states out of the San Francisco-based court circuit and create a brand new 12th Circuit.
They argue that the 9th is too big, too liberal and too slow resolving cases. If they succeed, only California, Oregon, Hawaii and two island districts would remain in the 9th’s judicial fiefdom.
Right now, Flake said, the circuit is far too sprawling. “It represents 20 percent of the population — and 40 percent of the land mass is in that jurisdiction. It’s just too big,” Flake told Fox News on Wednesday. “We have a bedrock principle of swift justice and if you live in Arizona or anywhere in the 9th Circuit, you just don’t have it.”
Flake says it typically takes the court 15 months to hand down a decision. “It’s far too long,” he added.
Conservatives have mocked the 9th Circuit for years, often calling it the “Nutty 9th” or the “9th Circus,” in part because so many of its rulings have been overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Under Flake’s bill, the new circuit would cover Nevada, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Arizona and Alaska, leaving the 9th with three Pacific states as well as the Northern Mariana Islands and Guam.
A separate House version introduced by Rep. Andy Biggs and four other Arizona Republicans would leave Washington state in the 9th Circuit.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3523202/posts
We have met the enemy and he is us.
Trump just tasted: “SEE YOU IN COURT”
Tweeted=tasted
Agreed.
Thanks. They ruled that enemy aliens not present in the United States have due process rights to obtain a visa and enter the country.
I would not - repeat, NOT - appeal this decision to the USSC, which could - and will - make it fixed law by a 4-4 tie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.