Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Italian Muslims sign anti-extremism pact
TheLocal.it ^ | 2 February 2017 08:44 CET+01:00 | AFP

Posted on 02/02/2017 6:36:16 AM PST by Olog-hai

Italy’s Muslim community signed a pact with the government on Wednesday pledging to “reject all forms of violence and terrorism”, with prayers in mosques to be held in Italian.

“It’s a very important document which concerns the present and future of our country through inter-religious dialogue, starting from a basic principle: We may have different religions… but we are all Italian,” said Interior Minister Marco Minniti.

He added: “One of the essential points is that all the signatories have committed to reject all forms of violence and terrorism.”

Only a handful of Italian residents are known to have joined jihadist groups abroad and the country is not seen as having a significant problem with homegrown Islamist militancy. But the case of suspected Berlin truck bomber Anis Amri, believed to have radicalized in a Sicilian jail, focused attention on the issue in December. …

(Excerpt) Read more at thelocal.it ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: antiextremismpact; dhimmitude; eurabia; eussr; hijrah; italy; rop; taqiyyah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 02/02/2017 6:36:16 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

...and the Euro-twits will believe them.................


2 posted on 02/02/2017 6:38:03 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
...We may have different religions… but we are all Italian,”

That is their FATAL mistake. They are NOT ITALIAN, FRENCH, GERMAN, or BRITISH. They will not assimilate into YOUR cultural norms, YOU will be assimilated into THEIRS................or die....................

3 posted on 02/02/2017 6:40:09 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This devolution of European culture and heritage underscores the reality that NATO is a dated concept.


4 posted on 02/02/2017 6:40:26 AM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

In a related story, Satan has agreed to sign an anti-evil pact.


5 posted on 02/02/2017 6:40:35 AM PST by TheGipperWasRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Treaties with us kafir are not binding to muslims.


6 posted on 02/02/2017 6:41:39 AM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I note that they included “violence” and not just “terrorism”.

I know that the OIC has long served legal notice, that the PC crowd continues to ignore, that “terrorism” is to be understood per Sharia law ... which means Jihad is excluded from being considered “terrorism”.

I wonder how the definition of “violence” is likewise mangled by the OIC?

Is it only violence without right, which would again exclude violence by Muslims against non-Muslims, or has this word been untouched yet?


7 posted on 02/02/2017 6:42:48 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Whew! And Muslim’s never lie.


8 posted on 02/02/2017 6:43:38 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

They cannot contradict the “clear command” from “Allah”. And that entails fighting (with violence and other means) until the unbelievers submit and pay the jizyah.


9 posted on 02/02/2017 6:44:52 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheGipperWasRight

I thought he just did.................


10 posted on 02/02/2017 6:45:11 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Da nah na na na na na-nah, Taqiyya!


11 posted on 02/02/2017 6:45:43 AM PST by JPJones (George Washington's Tariffs were Patriotic. Build a Wall and Build a Wall of tariffs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Good to see the religion of peace declare that it isn’t.


12 posted on 02/02/2017 6:51:43 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

LOL Oh they signed a piece of paper so they will do it. Good grief how stupid can people get over there and here.

The left were saying this over Neville Chamberlain too when Hitler signed a piece of paper, and that really went well didn’t it.


13 posted on 02/02/2017 6:52:57 AM PST by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: manc

Here’s another fine example of that era:

The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, also known as the Nazi–Soviet Pact or the German–Soviet Non-aggression Pact (officially: Treaty of Non-aggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics), was a neutrality pact between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed in Moscow on 23 August 1939 by foreign ministers Joachim von Ribbentrop and Vyacheslav Molotov, respectively.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact


14 posted on 02/02/2017 6:55:30 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

good point. One would think people would learn form history, but alas, it seems not.


15 posted on 02/02/2017 6:56:45 AM PST by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Though they could potentially be backslidden.

Islam is absolutely an inherently violent and aggressive military doctrine posing as religion; however, there is a long history of Muslims getting comfortable with good lives, with wanting more than Islam offers, yet consider themselves genuine Muslims ... it’s why the history of Islam is littered with true believers (what the PC crowd deems “militants”) sweeping in from the countryside to overpower the slackers who’ve gone soft.

In terms of the political, legal and intellectual aspects of modern Islam the militants have already largely succeeded in this without the flood of sword swinging hicks gunning for the native elites because those elites have tried to point them our way (and even export as many militants as they can so that they aren’t their problem).

(In the meantime it would be hard to find a big yacht out of Turkey listed for construction or sale that didn’t have a wet bar)

It isn’t uncommon at such times for the Muslims enjoying a non-jihadi good life to eventually try to push back; however, their or written doctrine stands against them in any efforts to resist even if that’s what they are really doing.


16 posted on 02/02/2017 6:57:09 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Milan is a mess. I posted this once before...

We exit the Milano Centrale train station (2016). Hundreds of north Africans inside and outside. Huge train station, probably 500 very dark skinned skinnies. All males in their twenties. No women or children.

All just loitering.

First attempted scare was by this dude half my size from north Africa. We are carrying luggage. Dude walks in front, yells in our faces “Aahhhhh!” to try to scare us. Our children have been through worse than that, so they weren’t scared. But it was quite culturally shocking to see that they are taking over MILAN by scaring people away.

Happened a few more times to us, different skinnies. We saw every visiting family getting yelled at.

Later, in McDonalds upstairs in the same station, we saw a skinny approach two old Italian women in their seats eating. He yelled “Haaaahhhh!” The women get up. He takes their seats.

Rome was clear. Not one skinny in the Romano Termini station (the big station). And didn’t really see them gathered anywhere in town. Maybe the Pope or the Rome city government keeps Rome clear?


17 posted on 02/02/2017 6:57:57 AM PST by Proyecto Anonimo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

The left never learns from history.
That’s why they don’t want to teach it.................


18 posted on 02/02/2017 6:58:56 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’m fully convinced that Satan doesn’t have a problem with people being moral just so long as they are unholy and their morality of the flesh.


19 posted on 02/02/2017 6:59:11 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

In a related story, the ‘Italian’ muslims asked in exchange for not going full jihadi only to be allowed to pray at St. Peters on alternate days, except during their holidays when they asked to be given use throughout. The Pope applauded the idea and the deal was signed.


20 posted on 02/02/2017 7:06:18 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson