The Canadians learned from America's FIRST Muslim President.
1. Never let a crises go to waste.
2. Lie, Lie and Lie some more.
3. Make the investigation fit the goal, not the truth
Posted on 02/01/2017 6:32:09 PM PST by markomalley
On Sunday night six people were massacred and a number of others wounded when a man opened fire with an automatic weapon in a mosque in Quebec City.
Initial reports quoted witnesses as saying that there were multiple gunmen, and that they shouted “Allahu Akhbar” as they fired into the crowd. By the following morning, however, the Narrative had completely shifted: there was only one attacker, a white Quebecois; the other man who had initially been arrested (named Mohamed) had morphed into a witness. The legacy media immediately discovered “likes” for Donald Trump and Marine Le Pen on the accused shooter’s social media accounts, and proclaimed him a “right-wing terrorist” who may even have been inspired by the election of Donald Trump.
The current version of the story is strongly reminiscent of what happened after Anders Behring Breivik committed his massacre in Norway in July 2011. The crime is suspiciously convenient for Prime Minister Justin “Baby Doc” Trudeau, who is trying to get a law through Parliament that would make it illegal to insult Islam.
In fact, the first fallout from the mosque massacre may already have occurred, with the arrest of a man in Montreal for posting hateful remarks about Muslims on social media.
So what really happened that night? Why did the Narrative do a sudden 180-degree turn? Why was “Allahu Akhbar” so quickly forgotten? What was the real role of the “witness” named Mohamed?
Given the fact that Quebec is a leftist multicultural stronghold, and that Canada currently has a far-left Islamophilic prime minister, we’ll probably never learn the answers to these questions. But Faith Goldy of TheRebel.media hasn’t given up trying:
1. the witnesses can’t be trusted they’re Muslim
Actually, if you look at the video, you'd see that the witnesses were saying there were two perps.
It seems as if the Trudeau government is forcing a narrative change.
Their is no doubt in my mid that this is total bull shit. That was muzzie on muzzie. It was in fact, Wahhabi sunni on Shiite!! The government i lining to save its existence They let these killers in and they know it— But hear this — It has only just started until they get them OUT!!
I agree the story seems screwy. Like when they first said Tiger Woods’ wife smashed out his SUV window with a golf club because she saved him and pulled him to safety. I remember that. The next day they admitted he cheated with a porn star.
The government would never lie.
No evil is too evil with leftists
The “witness” named Mohamed was thought to be a shooter at first. How can he be a witness? Was he one of the congregation? If he was just another one of the congregation, why is he centered out? Aren’t they all witnesses? This is just too strange.
The Canadians learned from America's FIRST Muslim President.
1. Never let a crises go to waste.
2. Lie, Lie and Lie some more.
3. Make the investigation fit the goal, not the truth
We just don’t know enough about this case.
Yet.
That is so good!! I don’t have your advanced skills. But I am serious as a cancer diagnosis, Canada is LYING!! Let me just aXed you dis, If you are a French Separatist, why would you go into a Shiite Mosque yelling “Ally Akibar”? Wth?? Tell me how that advances the Separatist cause?????. Those people need to capture and hang that trudeau faggot on ive TV
That is so good!! I don’t have your advanced skills. But I am serious as a cancer diagnosis, Canada is LYING!! Let me just aXed you dis, If you are a French Separatist, why would you go into a Shiite Mosque yelling “Ally Akibar”? Wth?? Tell me how that advances the Separatist cause?????. Those people need to capture and hang that trudeau faggot on ive TV
The story starts to make more sense if you consider the possibility that one of the perpetrators/witnesses in the attack was a Canadian intelligence agent or a Muslim informant who was conducting surveillance in the mosque and either went rogue or whose role can’t be identified in the investigation.
And did they search the basement of the mosque? What’d they find? MANPADS?
Khadir was (apparently) questioned for 12 hours after the attack - not normal behaviour for a witness.
One theory is that he and Bissonet really did attack the place together (for whatever reason).
The Canadian Govt realised that the optics of a Muslim on Muslim attack just one day after Trudeau declared for refugees were awful, so (the theory goes) offered the mother of plea deals to Khadir to remove him from the suspect list, and so allow Trudeau to use the narrative of a lone, white gunman.
IF there’s anything in that theory then there would be discrepancies in the camera & ballistic evidence that would come out in trial. If there is a trial.
If this IS a cover-up then I would hope that a disgusted policeman or forensic functionary would leak the truth.
If it continues to get buried or eventually forgotten - you’ll know that the narrative didn’t fit.
There are plenty of rats to smell with this story.
We will probably never, ever know for sure. I get the feeling Trudeau can be just as sneaky as most Heads of State.
There are too many layers of confusion and misinterpretation possible. Three different languages, three different cultures, possibly more than one different ‘people of interest’.
We still speculate about the JFK assassination to this day.
Nation’s tend to dole the truth out as needed to produce particular results.
Cannot trust the media anymore...they are all in the leftist tank...no mention that the shooter also liked the left wing NDP Party and the socialist Bloc Québécois on his Facebook page and witnesses claim God is great chants were heard?...Trudeau’s ass is hanging out so the wagons are being circled.
The epitaph is “Allah Is Greatest” iirc. A bit different than how it is reported.
Not only cannot we ordinary mortals trust the Canadian media, but it is getting worse. The statement initially by Fox News, was that a second man was also involved in the carnage. It was thumped home time and time again that Fox had to backtrack after a police statement.
The press has what they wanted. Soon, it will follow with a campaign to absolutely smear anyone who dares question the whole business.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.