No president since John F. Kennedy has dared to take on the CIA or the rest of the national security establishment [
] They knew that if they opposed the national-security establishment at a fundamental level, they would be subjected to retaliatory measures. Kennedy
After the Bay of Pigs, he vowed to tear the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter them to the winds. He also fired CIA Director Allen Dulles, who, in a rather unusual twist of fate, would later be appointed to the Warren Commission to investigate Kennedys murder.
Brennan is a Muslim convert and pro-Islamic policy maker. He is dangerous
Agreed, there should be a full investigation into Jihad Johnny bin Brennan and the way he’s operated the CIA. I’m still wondering how an adherent of an enemy ideology got put into this important position.
Brennan’s knows he has been exposed. Preemptive strike!
Back and to the left.
Douglas McArthur and President Truman all over again.
We could slash the national intel budget by 75% and still have better intel than we have today.
Anyone loving the irony of the left siding with the CIA death machine they hate so much?
The way they talk about Trump, its like they still think of him as just a presidential candidate.
Whatever Brennan, clear our your s-— and get the f-— out.
First off he asked if we are living in Nazi Germany, and that is an appropriate question to ask considering their leakage of something that is so blatantly false when can only conclude that it's intention was to damage Trump. That is not the goal of our CIA to try and sway support from our incoming President. Also, you should take umbrage with that considering you own it completely. You are the Nazi like person at the helm of the CIA, Brennan. Admit it, shut up, and move along.
FU Muslim turncoat
The Russian “threat” is the CIA’s rice bowl.
why should he or we trust any federal intelligence/leo agency to keep us safe?. all they’ve done is demonstrate their varying degrees of corruption and incompetence over three decades in a costly (in terms of blood and treasure) sea of unsavory alphabet soup.
Brennan also questioned the message it sends to the world if the president-elect broadcasts he does not have confidence in the United States’ own intelligence agencies.<<<
Since we are part of the world, what msg. do we get? That they put out info to the news papers about golden showers that never happened. That they lack some credibility. That they failed to hold political people accountable for putting national secrets at risk by putting that info on a non-secure computer and then tried to blame the PE for it being hacked!! Wow, conclusions like that do a whole lot to win the world’s confidence, doesn’t it???
They threatened to withhold security issues from Trump before he was elected. What does that say to ME? That they don’t want to answer to their boss, they are subversive, and dishonest. Good ethics are lacking and they can’t measure up to the ethical standards that Trump demands. They can’t even keep a security meeting with him, confidential!
It tells me that Trump will be cleaning out that swamp, too, or that he needs to. THEN perhaps the world WILL have some respect. But as of late, the intelligence community hasn’t done itself very many favors over the last few years.
IMO, Trump should build massive walls and not leave his own Estate in Florida. Only accept visits from close friends and family with screenings for chem/bio weapons. Never get on a plane/chopper. And do all meetings remotely.
He is such a threat to the bastards, I wouldnt be surprised if they get one of his assigned USSS guys to turn
There are those who say the CIA has become politicized.
Others say, no it hasn’t.
Thank goodness Brennan is here to clear it up.
The intelligence community is filled with bureaucrats like Valerie Plame, who need to be expelled before they do to Trump what she did to Bush.
And BTW this is the same intelligence community that didn’t locate Libyas WMDs or much of the Al Qaeda hierarchy - they couldn’t or wouldn’t find their ass with both hands