Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi: Were It Not for Obama, $19,951,756,200,280 Debt Would Be Higher
Cybercast News Service ^ | January 13, 2017 | 2:00 PM EST | Penny Starr

Posted on 01/13/2017 10:08:24 PM PST by Olog-hai

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said on Friday that were it not for "the work" of President Barack Obama, the federal debt would have increased even more than the $9 trillion that it has increased over the eight years of his presidency.

“Absent the work of President Obama this national debt would be even higher,” Pelosi said at her weekly briefing with reporters at the Capitol when asked about the increase in the federal budget under Obama. […]

“As I’ve said over and over again: Show me your budget, show me your values,” Pelosi said. “And we see today on the reconciliation a clue. We haven’t seen the full budget because that will come later.”

“When (Obama) stood on the steps of the Capitol eight years from next week the deficit was $1.4 trillion—one-year deficit,” Pelosi said. “It’s reduced by 70 percent in his administration.” […]

“[Clinton] had us on a path of $5.4 trillion in debt reduction,” Pelosi said. “Not deficit, debt reduction—as opposed to an annual deficit—the debt reduction. President Bush came to office, he reversed all of that. …

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: liberalagenda; nationaldebt; obama; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Windflier

The joke is they think they’re glad too, in spite of how it cost them in 2010, 2014 and 2016.


21 posted on 01/13/2017 11:22:01 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This is the same dipshiite that claimed unemployment was good for the economy because people got unemployment insurance and it helped keep the economy moving.

As usual the LIBs get part of it slanted correctly because yes the Unemployment money does get put back into the economy BUT they neglect to mention that the money that is getting put back in was paid for by US

I would sure like to see Trump start investigations how pols mates have benefited over the years because of insider info + straight out bribes and threats.

It will definitely take a NON POL, successful person AND his cabinet is full of people who don’t need to run around with their hand out to fatten their own pockets.

I am sure glad the MSM ran with Trumps ‘quotes’ etc saying he felt bad that people actually thought he was ‘dumb’ enough to ‘perform’ in a Moscow hotel, knowing that the rooms are most certainly bugged and on tape.


22 posted on 01/13/2017 11:38:44 PM PST by xrmusn ((6/98)" "If you see a civilian in cammies -- bump into him")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Dems don’t realize it, but we’re fully backing their refusal to budge on their socialist, envirowacko, LGBTQXZ agenda.

They keep doing the same things, and gosh darn it, they’re gonna get different results!


23 posted on 01/13/2017 11:53:20 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Look the debt is now 20 trillion.

20 trillion. Half of that, was just during the Obama years.

Obama has been a disaster for America.

Trump has come to office, just in the nick of time.


24 posted on 01/14/2017 12:08:29 AM PST by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Oh yeah, Obama is a fiscal hawk. Oh yes he is.


25 posted on 01/14/2017 12:16:13 AM PST by joshua c (Cut the cord! Don't pay for the rope they hang you with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

It is higher. Probably in excess of $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities.


26 posted on 01/14/2017 12:27:30 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

And then there’s the problem with derivatives. Last count at $247 trillion FWICS. (Or $1.5 quadrillion, depending on the site talking about it.)


27 posted on 01/14/2017 12:36:17 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Nazi Peloser...quite a piece of work...


28 posted on 01/14/2017 12:38:44 AM PST by EnigmaticAnomaly ("What do you call a basement full of liberals? A whine cellar...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The ruling class sure did give us a nice parting gift, didn’t they ?


29 posted on 01/14/2017 12:39:34 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Nancy Pelosi is a walking billboard for the mental disorder of liberalism.

Right on.

30 posted on 01/14/2017 2:35:07 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All
THIS IS OBAMA'S LEGACY----FOURTEEN TRILLION DOLLARS Behind The Real Size of the Obama Bailout; the secret programs that make up the $14 trillion federal bailout of Wall Street
SOURCE motherjones.com --- Mon Dec. 21, 2009 12:23 PM PST

The price tag for the Wall Street bailout is popularly put at $700 billion—---the actual size of TARP--the Troubled Assets Relief Program.

But TARP is just the best known program in an array of more than 30 overseen by Treasury Department and Federal Reserve that have paid out or put aside untraceable money to bail out financial firms and inject money into the markets.

PAUSE TO REFLECT First-term Obama had tight control of the US Treasury; Obama calculatedly placed his then-COS Rahm Emanuel in a dual role.......in the WH and at Treasury. Obama had a stranglehold on Treasury via COS Rahm Emanuel's dual role.

To get a sense of the size of the real $14 trillion bailout, see MJ chart at web site. A guide to the pieces of the puzzle includes massive untraceable Treasury Department bailout programs.

Money Market Mutual Fund: In September 2008, the Treasury controlled by Obama/Emanuel announced that it would insure the holdings of publicly offered money market mutual funds. According to the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP), these guarantees could have potentially cost the federal government more than $3 trillion [PDF].

Public-Private Investment Fund: This joint Treasury-Federal Reserve program bought toxic assets from banks and brokerages—as much as $5 billion of assets per firm. According to SIGTARP, the government's potential exposure from the PPIF is between $500 million and $1 trillion [PDF].

TARP: As part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the Treasury controlled by Obama/Emanuel made loans to or investments more than 750 banks and financial institutions. $650 billion has been paid out (not including HAMP; see below). As of December 21, 2009, $117.5 billion of that has been repaid.

Government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) stock purchase: The Treasury controlled by Obama/Emanuel bought $200 million in preferred stock from Fannie Mae and another $200 million from Freddie Mac [PDF] to show that they "will remain viable entities critical to the functioning of the housing and mortgage markets."

GSE mortgage-backed securities purchase: Under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, the Treasury controlled by Obama/Emanuel may buy mortgage-backed securities from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. According to SIGTARP, these purchases could cost as much as $314 billion ---SNIP---.

LONG READ---go to web site to read more and checkout the shocking financial charts.

SOURCE http://motherjones.com/politics/2009/12/behind-real-size-bailout

31 posted on 01/14/2017 2:40:18 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The geriatric Valley Girl speaks again. The real question is whether Pelosi has ever said anything remotely intelligent in her entire life.


32 posted on 01/14/2017 2:43:59 AM PST by JustaCowgirl ( If a regime would be happier in the afterlife than this life, that regime is not subject to threats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Mmmmm....Pelosi’s suck-up is such an inspiration (Barf).

I can hear Valerie typing.......composing yet another donation letter for Obamas get-rich-quick foundations.


33 posted on 01/14/2017 2:45:51 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

https://www.fms.treas.gov/dts/index.html
Real numbers here.
It’s ugly.
I suppose if they keep repeating the lie someone will believe it.


34 posted on 01/14/2017 3:16:42 AM PST by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

We haven’t had a budget for ten years.

Just continuing resolutions.

Nancy Pelosi always plays fast and loose with the truth.


35 posted on 01/14/2017 3:18:42 AM PST by exit82 (Making America Great Again begins with........me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Nancy Pelosi, financial wizard. Notice how no other dim Dem comes to her defense. Where is Steny Hoyer? Maxine Waters?


36 posted on 01/14/2017 3:24:50 AM PST by Artie (We are surrounded by MORONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

She’s mental


37 posted on 01/14/2017 3:50:51 AM PST by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

Two possibilities...either her constituents are as stupid as her, or they keep electing her to keep her away.

My ex-Mother-in-Law is a constituent, so it could go either way.


38 posted on 01/14/2017 5:17:56 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Final countdown to the liberals' Trumpaccolips! Yee Haw!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

She is bat shit crazy. Stevie Winder could see that.


39 posted on 01/14/2017 5:20:55 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

You know, I hate to keep commenting on Pelosi every time she says something stupid, but she keeps saying something stupid. Gotta wonder if she’s all there.


40 posted on 01/14/2017 5:43:09 AM PST by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson