[Rockitz]

Video at link.

[scooby321]

Great Interview Hannity

[Resettozero]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3510562/posts

SARAH PALIN POST ON FACEBOOK:

To Julian Assange: I apologize.

Please watch Sean Hannity’s interview with Julian Assange (Wikileaks).

Exposing the truth re: the Left having been oh-so-guilty of atrocious actions and attitudes of which they’ve falsely accused others. The media collusion that hid what many on the Left have been supporting is shocking. This important information that finally opened people’s eyes to democrat candidates and operatives would not have been exposed were it not for Julian Assange.

I apologize for condemning Assange when he published my infamous (and proven noncontroversial, relatively boring) emails years ago.

As I said at the time of being targeted and my subsequent condemnation, though, the line must be drawn before our troops or innocent lives deserving protection would be put at risk as a result of published emails.
Julian, I apologize.

- Sarah Palin

ps. If you get the chance, catch the movie “Snowden.” That movie and Hannity’s interview tonight are quite enlightening.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/03/assange-russian-government-not-source-wikileaks-emails.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlSAiI3xMh4&app=desktop

[wjcsux]

Bookmark

[DaxtonBrown]

Assange talks about powerful people out for revenge. I wrote Harry Reid’s only biography and I can tell people now that he is all mobbed up, Chicago and Detroit mob. Obama, Hillary, Podesta, Rahm Emmanuel, Valerie Jarrett are all Chicago products. Pelosi’s dad was all mobbed up too. People will be shocked just how bad his all is, $millions and $billions in bribes.

I believe Assange 1000%

[Little Ray]

Yes.
They gave large sums of money to the Clinton Foundation money laundry to purchase influence in the Federal Government, but Hillary! lost and and there are no refunds...

[Bratch]

Allahpundit says Wikileaks don't know nothin'.

---

As for Assange, to whom Conway says in the clip we should pay “significant attention,” since when does he know who his sources are in a sufficiently definitive way to be able to rule anyone in or out? When Wikileaks got started, Assange made a point of noting that the site was engineered so that neither he nor his staff would know who was sending them documents. That’s how he could ensure perfect anonymity to leakers — Wikileaks wouldn’t reveal their identities because Wikileaks wouldn’t know their identities. Now he’s telling Sean Hannity on camera that he absolutely, positively guarantees that it wasn’t Russian intelligence (or, more likely, a go-between who was given the Democratic material by Russian intelligence for the purpose of handing it off to Assange). How can he possibly say? Either Wikileaks knows the identities of its sources or it doesn’t.

---

 

"You're breaking my narrative!"

 

[Jolla]

Is he being detained illegally, I thought he is there on his own choice to avoid charges

[Jumper]

Julian, you are not being detained illegally. You put yourself into the role of someone who published illegally obtained USG Classified information. You should have understood the hardships to your family... and if the Russian’s or Muslim’s do their normal revenge, it will include killing your family. Now I applaud you bringing down Hillary and the DNC, but that is a separate issue from USG property.

[silverleaf]

He’s trying to buy safety for his family which must be under threat

[Gen-X-Dad]

Hannity maybe monotonous and monotone on his grinding delivery on the radio and TV, but he gives excellent interviews. He gave Assange plenty of time to respond on complex answers to difficult questions. Worth watching.