[WENDLE]

Total FAKE news with not a centilla of evidence.

[combat_boots]

Sarah will keep an eye on the Russians.....

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/11/sarah-palin-trolls-defeated-democrats-i-can-keep-an-eye-on-russia/

[Paladin2]

It’s fake since the CIA isn’t even confirming the rumor much less laying out some evidence. The CIA has never been a nexus of Truth.

[left that other site]

What evidence?

Where?

When?

[ez]

Ok let’s see some of that there swell if evidence...

[Fiddlstix]

[TigersEye]

Why doesn’t anyone in the Marx Stream Media publish some of this evidence?

[mrsmith]

Last week, [outgoing] Central Intelligence Agency officials presented lawmakers with a stunning new judgment...

[ForYourChildren]

Former UK Ambassador Blasts "CIA's Blatant Lies", Shows "A Little Simple Logic Destroys Their Claims"

Authored by Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, and was the Rector of the University of Dundee

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-11/former-uk-ambassador-blasts-cias-blatant-lies-shows-little-simple-logic-destroys-the

Tyler Durden
Dec 11, 2016 7:25 PM

Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of Assange, called the CIA claims “bullshit”, adding: “They are absolutely making it up.”

“I know who leaked them,” Murray said. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.

[ifinnegan]

The left are trying to implicate Trump in working with a foreign country to affect the election. That would be a serious crime.

They have their goal to postpone the Inauguration so that an investigation to clear up these serious charges can be done.

That is their current strategy to keep Trump out.

As far as this piffle. What does the Muslim CIA chief say? Did he go on record?

And why would these same people who didn’t believe the CIA about Iraq and WMD now believe them?

[dgbrown]

But at least we know Hillary’s emails were never hacked.

[Sasparilla]

However, the FBI disagrees. This is all a political Obama dirty trick.

[RegulatorCountry]

Let’s just wade into the fever swamp for a minute and present that it’s true, that Russians somehow intervened despite voting machines and vote tallying processes that are not accessible via internet.

So, is this a new thing? I suspect it isn’t. Security has been far worse in the not too distant past. Leftists of the world have been overt in their desire for leftist Presidents in the past, also (ahem, cough, cough, George Soros).

Funny how it’s suddenly become some sort of bad thing, when they’ve never had a problem with it before.

[Williams]

It’s exhausting to dissect all the misdirection in this article. No new evidence. Circumstantial evidence. Russians “got their desired result” as if they controlled the American voter. It’s obviously political bs.

[grumpygresh]

“It is unclear why the C.I.A. did not produce this formal assessment before the election, although several officials said that parts of it had been made available to President Obama in the presidential daily briefing in the weeks before the vote.”

So if 0bama had this info before the election, why didn’t he release it? 0bama could have leaked to anyone he wanted. So does the NYT think that 0bama was covering for Trump?

LOL! What BS fake news!

[Sgt_Schultze]

Bunk. What we have is only is the speculation of agencies controlled by an administration which supported the losing candidate. There is no proof that has come forward to implicate Russia in the Wikileaks disclosures.

None. This is nothing but an agenda-driven administration spinning yarns.

[Dr.Deth]

It is unclear why the C.I.A. did not produce this formal assessment before the election, although several officials said that parts of it had been made available to President Obama in the presidential daily briefing in the weeks before the vote.

Thereby explaining why nobody had seen it until after the election.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

NEVER MIND the freakin “Russian hacks”

Let’s concentrate on the real problem:

RAT hacks...exposed...trying to steal an election.

[montag813]

overwhelming circumstantial evidence Wow. No words for this garbage.

Fake in a court of law, or in a newspaper.

[headstamp 2]

Yeah, Russia would really want Trump as president over a confirmed sociopathic grifter that they could buy off at will.