Posted on 12/06/2016 9:38:00 PM PST by JOHN ADAMS
Too much information. Just be ruthless with them and take names afterwards.
I don’t want it to stop—I want it done against all liberals, now.
This is a great tool to with which to torment Democrats.
Fire any and everyone involved.
Or we could have a flat tax and elminate the IRS. Or we could elminate all campaign finance laws. Why settle formthe snack not biting you when you could kill the snake?
Best way to stop the IRS from targeting Conservative political groups is to abolish the IRS. While we’re at it, repealing the 16th Amendment would be even better.
The first order of business needs to be the repeal of Roe v. Wade, after an appropriate SCOTUS becomes available, with immediate prosecution of baby body part dealers. That is already illegal.
They used it against us... and the MSM didn't give a damn. Let's see if they care when it's used against democrats.
I think they need more than a new boss at Justice and the IRS, but a lot of new staff. Staff who cooperated with the old regime showed that their loyalty was to party, not to justice. They should be gone, by whatever legal means available.
If I had a slush fund like the clintons and Al Gore and others I would not have to pay the IRS money for the stock profit I made.
If Obama appointed them or were appointed by any chain of people leading back to Obama, remove them. Go at least 3 layers deep.
We’re talking about the IRS, not ROE v. WADE!
IRS is far far far better than the state of California.
He needs to TOTALLY clean that department out. Who will he pick?
Roe v. Wade is a US Supreme Court decision, not a law.
Laws can get repealed to negate them.
Judicial decisions must be overturned to be nullified.
My (admittedly limited) understanding of the issue is that Roe v. Wade turned on the basis of states' rights, and was not determined on the basis an Unalienable right to Life (or lack thereof). Thus, if Roe v. Wade were reversed, the abortion issue would then become 50 separate state issues. Most states would leave abortion legal in at least some form; a few others would probably ban it altogether; and "liberal" states would keep even late-term abortion legal.
For those who are pro-life, the unfortunate side effect of overturning Roe v. Wade would possibly be to create a situation where abortion could never be banned altogether in the United States. But perhaps a new case could establish something like that?
So, to me, overturning Roe v. Wade seems like it might become a double-edged sword and introduce unintended consequences. But at least individuals, if they felt strongly enough about the issue, would have the potential option of moving to states that banned abortion, while others who felt differently could move to states that allowed it.
I imagine that this would leave many pro-lifers disappointed, though, because, even though abortion would be illegal in some states, the notion of a nationwide ban would become impossible.
However, I'm not intimately familiar with the legal precedents on which the original decision turned. Clearly, some believe there are issues of federalism and states' rights involved, while others focus on an Unalienable right to Life that applies to all individuals.
It'll be interesting to see what happens, but I believe that those who expect a nationwide ban on abortion to occur as a result of overturning Roe v. Wade are probably mistaken...
No, just punish the most prominent perps, make an example, and tell everyone to stop it or else. Vlad the Impaler only needed to do as much.
I vote national sales tax at retail point of sale only. No fed taxes on exports, no taxes on sales of used products. From the ground/sea to the table we only tax retail sales. No Fed income or corporate/ bus taxes. Each bus sends their monthly state and fed sales tax check to the state treas. State totals monthly sales and forwards check to Fed treasury. Sec of Treas would need a personal Sec for appointments and an accounting clerk to receive (57) checks from the “Obama” count. This would immediately do five things:
1. No more tax filing/sales receipt is proof you paid taxes.
2. No more IRS, since states already audit businesses, the state audit/tax system would double as Fed audit as well. Instant taxpayer savings.
3. Rerun to states rights, no more unfunded mandates (states simply hold monthly fed checks to cover costs).
4. American products export for about 30% less ( think balance of trade) and everyone wants genuine American made products.
5. MOST important, we would have a true Truth in Taxation law. When the budget is proposed every year the national sales tax rate would have to be adjusted to cover current expenses, no more deficit spending. We will be able to look at our sales receipt and know EXACTLY how much the gov is picking our pockets for. And also who to vote out, every election cycle.
This would encourage saving and investment the two necessary elements to a capitalist society. Money to invest, money to purchase, and let the market, not gov policy/executive orders determine winners and losers.
No - post their names in public. Expose the vampires to sunlight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.