Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: But... Wait... The Good Guys Won't Win With More Crony Capitalism
Young Conservatives ^ | 12/2/2016 | Sarah Palin

Posted on 12/03/2016 3:23:37 AM PST by JediJones

I am ecstatic for Carrier employees! Their bosses just decided to keep shop onshore. What a relief for hundreds of workers. Merry Christmas Indiana!

We don't yet know terms of the public/private deal that was cut to make the company stay, but let's hope every business is equally incentivized to keep Americans working in America.

Foundational to our exceptional nation's sacred private property rights, a business must have freedom to locate where it wishes. In a free market, if a business makes a mistake (including a marketing mistake that perhaps Carrier executives made), threatening to move elsewhere claiming efficiency's sake, then the market's invisible hand punishes. Thankfully, that same hand rewards, based on good business decisions.

But this time-tested truth assumes we're operating on a level playing field.

When government steps in arbitrarily with individual subsidies, favoring one business over others, it sets inconsistent, unfair, illogical precedent. Meanwhile, the invisible hand that best orchestrates a free people's free enterprise system gets amputated. Then, special interests creep in and manipulate markets. Republicans oppose this, remember? Instead, we support competition on a level playing field, remember? Because we know special interest crony capitalism is one big fail...

Reaganites learned it is POLICY change that changes economic trajectory...We need Reaganites in the new Administration.

However well meaning, burdensome federal government imposition is never the solution. Never. Not in our homes...schools...churches...businesses...

But know that fundamentally, political intrusion using a stick or carrot to bribe or force one individual business to do what politicians insist, versus establishing policy incentivizing our ENTIRE ethical economic engine to roar back to life, isn't the answer. Cajole only chosen ones on Main St or Wall St and watch lines stretch from Washington to Alaska full of businesses threatening to bail unless taxpayers pony up...

(Excerpt) Read more at youngcons.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: carrier; clutchpearls; crony; cronycapitalism; generalmotors; illiteratefreepers; lofofreepers; makecronyismgreat; msmtelluswhattothink; noisesinourheads; palin; palinbetrayedtrump; readingishard; readthedamnarticle; retardsforpalin; sarahpalin; sarahpalinisright; shriekatpalin; suckitupbuttercup; thinkinghurtsus; trump; twominutehate; welovebiggovernment; whatdidbadladysay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: dasboot

Sarah needs to remember that the American worker has not been working on a level playing field for a very long time. I’m all for libertarian thought, but how about bringing things back level before we talk about the government staying out of things. Companies have been rewarded for moving their jobs to cheap labor countries, talk about crony capitalism.

If we don’t have jobs in America, who is going to buy all the stuff these dummies are producing out of country?


21 posted on 12/03/2016 4:15:18 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

(1) How is this “crony capitalism” and (2) I guess Governor Palin didn’t get a role she wanted in the Trump admin?


22 posted on 12/03/2016 4:20:22 AM PST by Reno89519 (Drain the Swamp: Replace Ryan & McConnell; Primary Lyn' Ted and others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Seems like it. Both Carrier’s parent company, United Technology and Ford, should be instead OR ALSO put on notice that they will not get any US government contracts if they shift work overseas. As the world’s largest contractor, that threat would give them serious pause to moving parts of their companies overseas. It is a threat that Trump should use.


23 posted on 12/03/2016 4:24:18 AM PST by Reno89519 (Drain the Swamp: Replace Ryan & McConnell; Primary Lyn' Ted and others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
I agree. It's policy not persuasion that will correct the current imbalance in "free" trade.

Companies, both domestic and foreign, need incentivized to locate and produce in America, but on a universal not an individual basis.

I'm willing to give Trump a pass on this and the potential Ford negotiations, after all, he's not in office yet, but in the long term we can't proceed on one-off deals.

I also agree that we need to keep a sharp eye on Mr. Trump to ensure he doesn't over indulge his autocratic tendencies.

24 posted on 12/03/2016 4:26:48 AM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Basket_of_Deplorables
"(facepalm)"

Why? She's right.

25 posted on 12/03/2016 4:33:51 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
"The incentives were offered by the state and those were offered early on, long before Trump entered the picture."

And that makes it right?? Bribes are bribes and bad policy.

26 posted on 12/03/2016 4:37:44 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519
Why do you believe that Sarah Palin is saying that Trump's carrier deal was crony capitalism?

Did you read the article?

Did you get as far as the ninth paragraph?

It's clear - to anyone who read the article - that Sarah is not accusing Trump of anything. She is reiterating what ought to be a commonsense caution.


This entire thread is full of noise.

FReepers, read the article.

27 posted on 12/03/2016 4:37:44 AM PST by agere_contra (I will be glad and rejoice in your love, for You saw my affliction and knew the anguish of my soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Just shut up Sarah! Why don’t you go find some reality show to do.


28 posted on 12/03/2016 4:40:50 AM PST by Artcore (Trump 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dasboot

That “If” in your second sentence is what’s being ignored. People are treating her statement as if she used the word “Since”.


29 posted on 12/03/2016 4:42:46 AM PST by Bob (No, being a US Senator and the Secretary of State are not veauccomplishments; they're jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Since we don’t even know if a “deal” was made this is a feckless article by Mrs Palin


30 posted on 12/03/2016 4:46:46 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveinSATX

Once she states she has no idea of the details all else is meaningless


31 posted on 12/03/2016 4:48:24 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

“But this time-tested truth assumes we’re operating on a level playing field.”

Does she really, really believe that NAFTA creates a level playing field?


32 posted on 12/03/2016 4:54:40 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

When the rubber meets the road, business theorists lose to reality.

Business is done by people, not companies. That is, business is done by people not companies.

The term crony capitalists is sour grapes and anguish by those who have no ability to do anything but carp.

It is likely that Trump knows the Chairman of United technologies and called him on the phone. His message, we need a little help in Indiana. Are you counting on the military contracts for next year?

the deal was essentially done


33 posted on 12/03/2016 4:54:51 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Does America still have lots of safe closets?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

It has been reported that Palin said the deal was an example of crony capitalism. From reading the excerpt, I see the reports were false.

She makes valid, constructive points.


34 posted on 12/03/2016 4:56:08 AM PST by ChessExpert (It's not compassion when you use government to give other people's money away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odawg

Do you really, really believe that Sarah Palin believes that NAFTA creates a level playing field?


35 posted on 12/03/2016 4:56:24 AM PST by agere_contra (I will be glad and rejoice in your love, for You saw my affliction and knew the anguish of my soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

BLAH, BLAH, BLAH. I get tired of listening to these “conservatives” talking about theoretical ideas.

Fact is Mexico, China and others are taking advantage of our extreme regulations and high taxes to simply steal away our businesses. And they’re succeeding thanks to the globalist who deliberately want companies to move off shore. Offering Carrier and others tax breaks and incentives in the short term is no different than offering tax decreases and elimination of regulations. Once the taxes and regulations are in line with other countries then I could agree with Palin’s concerns. But not now.

I say Merry Christmas Carrier employees!!! It is money better spent then on illegals.


36 posted on 12/03/2016 4:58:45 AM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

On the side: Do you think we’ll have to change the name Indiana to Native American-ana? Political correctness you know.

(or should we just throw all that crap out)!


37 posted on 12/03/2016 5:04:38 AM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrench

Or games shows. Seriously, where was she throughout the campaign? Now this public rebuke of what Trump did with United Technologies/Carrier? Now she’ll garner many a “LIKE” by the anti-Trumpers, both left and right. Just IMHO.


38 posted on 12/03/2016 5:05:57 AM PST by nfldgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pietro

The tax reduction and vast reduction of regulations are going to be for all business. When Trump takes office and can work those issues with Congress.

That is the long term ‘policy’ as expressed by President Elect Trump himself.


39 posted on 12/03/2016 5:08:11 AM PST by Jay Thomas (If not for my faith in Christ, I would despair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Oh please, grow up. Incentives to locate or remain in states have been consistently offered since the ‘60s. It’s good business sense and even the most basic thinker with two brain cells to rub together can figure ou. That incentive money is returned 10 times over by the taxes employees pay and by keeping jobs that all the suppliers of that business pay

Hmmmm $7 million in incentives and the company is going to invest $16 million in plant expansion? Who do you think is going to build that expansion? Are those construction workers going to pay taxes and support the local economy? What do you suppose the company is going to do with a bigger plant? Do you think they might hire more workers? Will those workers pay taxes and support the local economy?

Please! It’s a smart investment


40 posted on 12/03/2016 5:10:57 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson