Posted on 12/01/2016 11:54:52 AM PST by stylin19a
Up to the minute updates of various Wisc. recount counties.
Why are they doing this? There is no evidence of error? What is this madness?
-snip-
Although it was extremely early, in some of the smaller areas where the recounts happened faster, Donald Trump had actually gained a couple of votes in the first few hours of the Wisconsin recount.
-snip-
$3.5 Million reasons................
The way things are going these days, I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump came out with even more votes. Ha! I wonder if Jill and Hill will call for a nation recount because they are so concerned about accurate voting results!
Apparently several counties decided to go the hand-count method AFTER submitting their estimates to the state election board for machine recounting, no doubt as a means of injecting additional Jill Stein money into their local economies. I say kudos for their entrepreneurship!
One of the leading conspiracies is that the Russians or some other state actor hacked voting machines. This mix of hand recounts and machine recounts will be a good way to disprove that.
I think they want to distract media attention away from just how badly they were beaten.
The Conservatives need to keep the focus on their broad and dramatic victory... never mind the hype about a ‘recount’ which will change NOTHING.
Trump should do a rally on the back of a pick up truck in a parking lot where the recount is going on
it actually was revised to 3.9 million, she will have to pay the rest at the end.
what they are really doing is sitting around recounting all that money- they get their cut too- so yeah- they be all like ‘recount? Heck yeah, bring it on- baby needs a new set of sneakers’
the first rechecks they do as normal,’before any request was filed, there was a recording error and trump got a corrected number and over 400 more votes. someome initially wrote 44, and during rechecks compring vote totals to ballot numbers saw it was supposed to be 484.
Wisconsin - land of recalls and recounts... that the rats ALWAYS LOSE.
Right - and don’t invite the media... let them find out about it on their own! Ha!
Stein’s stated purpose in this recount is not to overturn the election, but rather to double check on the veracity of the “fake news” rumor that Russian hackers infiltrated the election. In that case it makes no sense whatsoever to not include New Hampshire in her request. The smallest margins of difference (according to CNN’s latest numbers) are 1. Michigan (0.3%), 2. New Hampshire (0.4%), 3. Wisconsin (0.8%), and 4 Pennsylvania (1.2%). Why skip New Hampshire to select states that have margins of difference twice and three times that of the Granite State?
by larger margins....
Why are they doing this?
Stein said it’s because all the polls said Hillary would win in a landslide ,LOL
From the article, it looks like 3 votes have been found for Trump and 2 for Clintoon compared to Election Night so far. A bunch are reporting that the counts were exactly as Election Night. Stein and Clintoon are looking stupider by the minute.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.