First stage of grief.
Doesn’t matter to the moonbats.
They’re demanding a recount come hell or high water.
Every vote has been carefully counted. They just don’t like the result.
It isn't about what is true - it is about the narrative. They want their followers to believe they didn't actually lose - the Republicans just "cheated" to win as they "always do" because real people don't vote for Republicans...that's the narrative they want floating around out there so the zombies won't think twice about their own distorted worldview.
Phase II: Denial. Anger. Bargaining. Grief. Acceptance.
Phase I: They ignore you. They laugh at you. They attack you. You win.
It’s only just begun, our schadenfreude.
The Hugo Chavez Society, whose motto is, “No election margin is too great to overturn an steal”
There is no record of 90% of the Pa vote. They mostly use Soros-type vote machines that don’t keep a paper record.
It would be great if a recount could catch machines that had been tampered with, but I’m sure the Dems have a way of skewing these machines and then hiding any evidence of it.
It's not about conducting a recount. It's about raising money.
If the recount never happens, the money raised just, well, "disappears".
This is true where I live. As a certified election challenger, I get to see the "tapes" from every machine (which in my district look like cash register receipts).
I also look at the local clerk's spreadsheet that shows his tabulation of each tape from each machine, including write-in votes.
To test the clerk's honesty and accuracy, my spouse and I make a practice of always entering at least one write-in name at the voting machine. I usually enter "Ronald Reagan" in some race that isn't hotly contested. Then later I check the clerk's tabulation to make sure my write-in for Ronald Reagan to recorded. It always is.
I find it hard to imagine how Russia could "hack" any of this process. The voting machines aren't connected to the internet.
While I'm sure it's possible to tamper with voting machines, seems to me the tampering would have to be done to each machine, one-by-one. This would likely have to be done during the pre-election machine calibration process. To be effective, any widespread machine tampering would have to be an immense undertaking.
Data scientists who found a 7% anomaly in states with electronic ballots made a classic error in their suggestion that the electronic ballots may have been hacked. This assumes that all the states with the paper ballot were not 7% fraudulent in the opposite direction.
In denial - or just plain nuts.
Same thing in the GOP primaries.
People without detailed knowledge of or experience with the process spun endless fantasies about bribes and vote-stealing.
Agent provocateurs even tried to bait or goad the ignorant into committing violent acts. It’s stunning actually.
Computer Scientists, lmao, there is no such thing. IT techs perhaps but computer scientists?!
I call Bovine Excretement. .
The day after the Inauguration is going to be hilarious.
Today is WI’s deadline for challenging the count. MI and PA have deadlines next week.
oh no, whatever will Jill do with the money now?
Why is it in every recount it’s always and only the Dems that gain votes? Hmmmm?
“Dino Rossi (born October 15, 1959) is a former member of the Washington State Senate.[1] He is an American commercial real estate executive,[2] two-time Republican candidate for Governor of Washington, and former Republican candidate for United States Senate. His first run for the Governor’s mansion in the 2004 election became the closest gubernatorial race in U.S. history; Rossi was certified as Governor-elect before losing a hand recount to Democrat Christine Gregoire.[3]”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_gubernatorial_election,_2004