Posted on 11/19/2016 11:40:21 AM PST by ColdOne
The New York Times is in trouble, and they know it. The paper has lost all credibility, and even long-time readers comfortable with its editorial bias have been sickened by the all-out trashing of Donald Trump over the past several months.
ADVERTISEMENT
When the publisher of the worlds most arrogant and all-knowing newspaper puts out a mea culpa promising to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism you can be pretty sure that something is awry. To pledge to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor suggests they have been doing otherwise, and that is a fact.
That said, nothing seems to have changed at the Times. The reporting still is admiring of all-things Obama and derisive of all things Trump, to a laughable degree.
A case in point: an article in the Sunday Styles section l
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
That dress, that night....I shudder.
The dress Michelle is wearing in the 1st photo is familiar-I have a tablecloth I got at Pier 1 for my round breakfast table that is just like it except it has light blue instead of pink for the background color-it’s a pretty tablecloth, but I wouldn’t wear it...
The left was absolutely orgiastic over Mooch’s boob belts.
There are few things I worry about less, than whether or not some “designer” will “dress” Melania Trump.
Somehow I think she, and all of us, will get by.
Are you kidding me ???? Please tell me that’s photoshopped.
The Old Gray Whore is having a come to Jesus moment but while coming down aisle to the alter, stumbled and couldn’t get up.
To mix metaphors, the JAP presstitute strikes out
That’s what I wondered.
OMG.
I missed the PINATA outfit. Thanks.
“hookers who had blacked out in a flower bed.”
LMAO! I’m going to share that with my Brit neighbor, if you don’t mind...
We’ve both said from day one that that she looks like she killed a couch and is wearing the skin as a trophy-it will be nice to have a 1st lady who dresses appropriately again...
The above is good example of a run-on sentence that I doubt the students of higher education even know what it is. I'd bet that 1 our of 3 won't recognize it nor see the misspelling of shuv. The correct phrasing and punctuation is below:
This is just one more reason why majoring in Journalism, Women's Studies, or Sexual Identity Studies are a waste of time. Student loans in such studies are also a waste of funds. Parents shove their kids off to college while thinking they will learn something.
I've watched Jay Leno's "Jay Walking" segments and "Water's World" segments questioning our youth on the street. I was astounded by the answers given so many times regarding simple questions. Most were college students. I knew the answers to many of those questions from grade school. Millennials are blindingly stupid.
If there is one Cabinet Department to be shut down, it should be the Department of Education. Their existence is only to serve their bureaucracy employees.
She quotes one designer saying the only unifying theme about the Trump wardrobes on election night was that they all had dressed in clothes that made them look rich. Well, thats often the case when you are rich.
Reminds me of this:
[T]he left really defines the word rich as anyone with anything the government wants to take. John F. Di Leo http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2014/12/josef-stalin-and-the-problem-of-political-opposition.html
I think you’re on to something there.
Now while I don’t want to dismiss your observation, I believe we just witness the Leftist MSM reach that point over the last 17.5 months.
They are a laughing stock. They and their twisted polling firms have no credibility with thinking people.
Bwahahahaha!
I had to stop watching Jay Walking....got me to upset.
Well, there goes my keyboard. ROTFL! You definitely nailed it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.