Posted on 11/19/2016 8:56:29 AM PST by cpforlife.org
The administration has already taken the first step to accommodate President-elect Trump’s positions, agreeing Friday to take a timeout on President Obama’s push to kick-start his 2014 deportation amnesty.
In documents filed with a federal judge in Texas the Justice Department said that in light of the new management that will take over next year, the case should be suspended.
“Accordingly, the parties respectfully submit that further proceedings on the merits of this case, including the submission of a schedule for resolving the merits, should be stayed until February 20, 2017,” the Justice Department and lawyers for Texas said in a joint request of Judge Andrew S. Hanen.
Judge Hanen had halted Mr. Obama’s expanded amnesty in February 2015, just two days before it was to go into effect, ruling that the administration broke administrative law. An appeals court twice upheld his injunction, as did the Supreme Court, in a 4-4 deadlock decision this summer.
The injunction remains in place while Judge Hanen was to hear full arguments — but both sides now say President-elect Trump should have the chance to weigh in.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
No more immigration from Third World countries. Deport all illegal aliens and reverse the demographic warfare that has resulted in a path to white minority status
Repeal the Immigration Act of 1965!
Tracing Liberal Woes to 1965 Immigration Act (or, how Ted Kennedy destroyed America)
http://www.cis.org/articles/1995/olg12-28-95.html ^
What went wrong with liberalism? Current and former liberals, like myself, should be even more interested in this puzzle than conservatives are. There are no simple answers nor a single pivotal moment of error, but the 30th anniversary this month of the 1965 Immigration Act illuminates the issue.
The Immigration Act was given only modest attention at its inception and even less in histories of the Great Society. In retrospect, however, it can be seen as perhaps the single most nation-changing measure of the era. The Hart-Celler Act, as it was called at the time, abolished the national origins quota system installed in the 1920s, shifting the basis for selection from an applicants nation of birth to his or her family relationships or skills.
A few critics questioned whether the new legislation, originally launched by President John F. Kennedy, would enlarge the immigrant flow and shift it from Europe to Asia, Latin America, and Africa. Supporters emphatically denied this. The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society, Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) said. Attorney General Robert Kennedy predicted 5,000 immigrants from the entire Asia-Pacific Triangle, after which immigration from that source would virtually disappear.
The effect of the bill on our population [in numbers] would be quite insignificant, Rep. Emanuel Celler, the act’s co-sponsor, said.
The importance of the law lay not in any change in immigrations volume or composition, sponsors said, but in its overdue elimination of the odious discrimination in US immigration law in favor of or against people on the basis of where they were born. The 1965 law was thus seen more as an extension of the civil rights movement than an immigration measure.
But 30 years later, it’s clear that the assurances of the law’s sponsors were untrue. The number of legal immigrants immediately jumped to 400,000, then to 800,000 by 1980, and reached well over 1 million in the early 1990s, when those given amnesty in 1986 and their relatives are added to the total. Illegal immigrants add 300,000 or more annually, many coming to join legally admitted relatives. Total immigration last year was 1.2 million, according to Center for Immigration Studies calculations. Whats worse, the number of legal admissions is set by statute, unrelated to overall economic trends such as unemployment.
For whom? Just curious.
What I want to know is if the MB was so ingrained into this administration, and Jarrett HATES America so much, what are they up to?
Nothing? They just realize they lost and are moving on?
Sounds too easy. But I’ll take it if that’s the case.
They have a very solid point - Trump is not the President of Mexico, so yes he his not their President!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Border Patrol agents’ union and the State of Mississippi tried to stop DACA in Court in the case of Crane v.Johnson. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals beld that Mississippi’s attempt to establish standing tbrough increased education costs was speculative and dismissed the case. Texas used driver’s license costs to establish standing to contest DACA. Of course, both programs disappear on January 21.
If PE Trump has the evidence of Obama’s birth, that sure could help right about now, couldn’t it? What did those two talk about during that hour and a half of conversation in the Oval Office?
You are correct.....Obama would never do anything out of the kindness of his heart for Trump.
We don’t know what the stealth objective is in Obamas position.
Thanks for the information.
In both cases it should have been our supposed opposition party in Congress, he had no authority to do what he did.
Problem was they did not oppose him doing it, illegal or not.
Something like this....after Trump tells Obama the situation.
I would suggest the bowing was done to a judge in Texas
Wait up...what about the 800 illegal alien criminals that were to be deported...?
and the administration mistakenly made them all US citizens...
Then it turns out that the number was 1800 and not 800
When people complaned and said reverse this
the administration said
we can't do the...it's not legal.
That mistake should be remedied by the new administration.
Deportation orders should have prevented any consideration for citizenship. It can be revoked.
since when do they follow the law....don’t trust them.
Search that works:
Searching for the exact phrase 'bows to incoming Trump administration'
Ordering search responses in time order.
No, it doesn’t sound right. They are up to something.
;)
And he said he would rescind those the first day.
LOL
They’d also bring in all the islamic migrants, have a permanent left majority on the Supreme Court and take over the entire healthcare system
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.